Restricted accessLetterFirst published online 2024-11
Response to: Fu-Xiang Lin,Yi Yu,Zhan-Ping Xu Letter to Editor: Unveiling the Crystal Clear: Cone Beam Computed Tomography’s Role in Enhancing PCNL Outcomes and the Path Forward
EmmottAS, BrotherhoodHL, PatersonRF, et al.Complications, re-intervention rates, and natural history of residual stone fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol, 2018; 32(1):28–32; doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0618
2.
HarrazAM, OsmanY, El-NahasAR, et al.Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Comparison of intraoperative assessment and postoperative non-contrast computerized tomography. World J Urol, 2017; 35(8):1241–1246; doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1990-4
3.
KingmaRA, DoppenC, BusMTJ, et al.The significance of clinically insignificant residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An analysis into the relevance of complete stone clearance. World J Urol, 2024; 42(1):78; doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04774-z
4.
KingmaRA, MorsR, BusMTJ, et al.Cone beam computed tomography-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a hybrid operating room: Optimization of patient selection. J Endourol, 2024; 38(5):432–437; doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0437
5.
KingmaRA, de JongIJ, GreuterMJW, et al.Cone beam computed tomography for detecting residual stones in percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a randomized controlled trial (CAPTURE) protocol. Trials, 2021; 22(1):805; doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05794-5
