Re: The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes: Methodological Flaws Led to the Erroneous Conclusion That Single-Use Is “Better”

Hogan D , Rauf H , Kinnear N , et al. The carbon footprint of single-use flexible cystoscopes compared with reusable cystoscopes. J Endourol, 2022; In Press; doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0891.

Department for Environment , Food and Rural Affairs/ Department for Business , Energy & Industrial Strategy (DEFRA/BEIS). UK Government GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting; 2021. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/greenhouse-gas-reporting-conversion-factors-2021 [Last accessed: July 6, 2022].

Olympus. A ‘360 Degree Approach’ to Endoscope Reprocessing; 2015. Available from: https://www.clinicalservicesjournal.com/story/13791/a-360-degree-approach-to-endoscope-reprocessing [Last accessed: July 6, 2022].

Davis NF , McGrath S , Quinlan M , et al. Carbon footprint in flexible ureteroscopy: A comparative study on the environmental impact of reusable and single-use ureteroscopes. J Endourol, 2018; 32(3):214–217; doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0001.

Sørensen BL , Grüttner H . Comparative study on environmental impacts of reusable and single-use bronchoscopes. Am J Environ Prot, 2018; 7(4):55–62; doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.20180704.11.

UK Department of Health. Health Technical Memorandum 01-06: Decontamination of Flexible Endoscopes; 2016. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/management-and-decontamination-of-flexible-endoscopes-htm-01-06/ [Last accessed: July12, 2022].

Drew J , Christie SD , Tyedmers P , et al. Operating in a climate crisis: A state-of-the-science review of life cycle assessment within surgical and anesthetic care. Environ Health Perspect, 2021; 129(7):76001; doi: 10.1289/EHP8666.