HoganD, RaufH, KinnearN, HennesseyDB. The carbon footprint of single-use flexible cystoscopes compared to reusable cystoscopes. J Endourol, 2022; 36:1460–1464.
2.
UsawachintachitM, IsaacsonDS, TaguchiK, et al.A prospective case-control study comparing lithovu, a single-use, flexible disposable ureteroscope, with flexible, reusable fiber-optic ureteroscopes. J Endourol, 2017; 31:468–475.
3.
McGillJJ, SchaefferAJ, GonzalezCM. Durability of flexible cystoscopes in the outpatient setting. Urology, 2013; 81:932–937.
4.
RindorfDK, TaillyT, KamphuisGM, et al.Repair rate and associated costs of reusable flexible ureteroscopes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urology Open Sci, 2021; 37:64–72.
