Robot-assisted microsurgery is a trending approach for the treatment of male infertility and chronic scrotal pain. The advantages seem to include increased optical magnification, improved surgical efficiency, absent tremor, and similar outcomes with standard methods. This chapter covers robotic microsurgical application and techniques for: robot-assisted vasectomy reversal with vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy, varicocelectomy, microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, and targeted denervation of the spermatic cord.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LiczbikO, GoertzS, WiśniewskiJ, KurlandtP, LibionkaW, AdamskiS, et al.From magnifying glass to operative microscopy—The historical and modern role of the microscope in microsurgery. Pol J Pathol, 2019; 70:14–20.
2.
ParekattilSJ, CohenMS. Robotic surgery in male infertility and chronic orchialgia. Curr Opin Urol, 2010; 20:75–79.
3.
KuangW, ShinPR, MatinS, ThomasAJJr. Initial evaluation of robotic technology for microsurgical vasovasostomy. J Urol, 2004; 171:300–303.
4.
SchiffJ, LiPS, GoldsteinM. Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: A prospective randomized study in a rat model. J Urol, 2004; 171:1720–1725.
5.
FlemingC. Robot-assisted vasovasostomy. Urol Clin North Am, 2004; 31:769–772.
6.
CorcioneF, EspositoC, CuccurulloD, SettembreA, MirandaN, AmatoF, et al.Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: Preliminary experience. Surg Endosc, 2005; 19:117–119.
7.
ParekattilSJ, BrahmbhattJV. Robotic approaches for male infertility and chronic orchialgia microsurgery. Curr Opin Urol, 2011; 21:493–499.
8.
ParekattilSJ, ErgunO, GudelogluA. Management of chronic orchialgia: Challenges and solutions—The Current Standard of Care. Res Rep Urol, 2020; 12:199–210.
9.
DavisBE, NobleMJ, WeigelJW, ForetJD, MebustWK. Analysis and management of chronic testicular pain. J Urol, 1990; 143:936–939.
10.
LevineLA. Microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord. J Sex Med, 2008; 5:526–529.
11.
ParekattilSJ, GudelogluA, BrahmbhattJV, PriolaKB, ViewegJ, AllanRW. Trifecta nerve complex—Potential anatomic basis for microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord for chronic orchialgia. J Urol, 2013; 190(1):265–270.
12.
FantusRJ, HalpernJA. Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Indications, operative technique, and outcomes. Fertil Steril, 2021; 115:1384–1392.
13.
AuyeungAB, AlmejallyA, AlsaggarF, DoyleF. Incidence of post-vasectomy pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020; 17(5):1788.
14.
HorovitzD, TjongV, DomesT, LoK, GroberED, JarviK. Vasectomy reversal provides long-term pain relief for men with the post-vasectomy pain syndrome. J Urol, 2012; 187:613–617.
15.
KavoussiPK, HarlanC, KavoussiKM, KavoussiSK. Robot-assisted microsurgical vasovasostomy: The learning curve for a pure microsurgeon. J Robot Surg, 2019; 13:501–504.
16.
MarshallMT, DoudtAD, BergerJH, AugeBK, ChristmanMS, ChoeCH. Robot-assisted vasovasostomy using a single layer anastomosis. J Robot Surg, 2017; 11:299–303.
17.
ChoCL, EstevesSC, AgarwalA. Indications and outcomes of varicocele repair. Panminerva Med, 2019; 61:152–163.
18.
BirowoP, Rahendra WijayaJ, AtmokoW, RasyidN. The effects of varicocelectomy on the DNA fragmentation index and other sperm parameters: A meta-analysis. Basic Clin Androl, 2020; 30:15.
19.
JensenS, KoEY. Varicocele treatment in non-obstructive azoospermia: A systematic review. Arab J Urol, 2021; 19:221–226.
20.
HsiaoW, RosoffJS, PaleJR, PowellJL, GoldsteinM. Varicocelectomy is associated with increases in serum testosterone independent of clinical grade. Urology, 2013; 81:1213–1217.
21.
McCulloughA, ElebyjianL, EllenJ, MechlinC. A retrospective review of single-institution outcomes with robotic-assisted microsurgical varicocelectomy. Asian J Androl, 2018; 20:189–194.
CalixteN, TojuolaB, KartalI, GudelogluA, HirschM, EtafyM, et al.Targeted robotic assisted microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord for the treatment of chronic orchialgia or groin pain: A single center, large series review. J Urol, 2018; 199:1015–1022.
24.
ParekattilS, GudelogluA, ErgunO, GalanteA, EtafyM, MendelsonR. MP31–11  What is the predictive value of a spermatic cord block prior to targeted microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord?. J Urol, 2021; 206(Supplement 3):e559-e.
25.
SteinbergPL, MerguerianPA, BihrleW, 3rd, HeaneyJA, SeigneJD. A da Vinci robot system can make sense for a mature laparoscopic prostatectomy program. JSLS, 2008; 12:9–12.
BaiF, LiM, HanJ, QinY, YaoL, YanW, et al.More work is needed on cost-utility analyses of robotic-assisted surgery. J Evid Based Med, 2022; 15:77–96.
28.
KolettisPN, ThomasAJJr. Vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal: A critical assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Urol, 1997; 158:467–470.
29.
MatthewsGJ, SchlegelPN, GoldsteinM. Patency following microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy: Temporal considerations. J Urol, 1995; 154:2070–2073.
30.
PengJ, ZhangZ, CuiW, YuanY, SongW, GaoB, et al.Spontaneous pregnancy rates in Chinese men undergoing microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy and possible preoperative factors affecting the outcomes. Fertil Steril, 2015; 103:635–639.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
