Abstract
Purpose:
The Retzius-sparing (RS) approach represents an important surgical innovation in how robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is performed. The aim of this study was to examine to what extent its development has followed the idea, development, evolution, assessment, and long-term study (IDEAL) recommendations.
Materials and Methods:
We conducted a comprehensive literature search for studies up to the 18th of March 2021. Abstracted data points included authorship, year of publication, study design, reported endpoints, and length of follow-up. We mapped each study to the five IDEAL stages of surgical innovation using published criteria.
Results:
Of 415 references, 118 were included in our analysis. Five academic centers authored >50% of all study reports, with the groups from Seoul (24; 20.3%), Milan (15; 12.7%), and Ninjang (10; 8.5%) being the main contributors. Approximately 40% of studies (50/118) were reported as full-text publications. Most of the reports mapped to retrospective studies (97/118; 82.2%) with approximately one-third (31/97; 32.0%) reporting the use of prospectively collected data. Cumulatively, 17,974 were reported on RS-RALP. Of those, 13,929 were unique cases. Approximately 23% of cases were reported in multiple publications (4045/17,974). We mapped 2, 12, and 3 studies to the idea, assessment, and long-term study stages, respectively, and no study to the development and evaluation stages.
Conclusions:
Few reported studies followed the IDEAL stages for surgical innovation; none addressed the stages of development and evaluation. Future systematic prospectively planned assessments would be helpful to refine the approach and address issues related to the surgical learning curve.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
