TakayasuH, AsoY. Recent development for pyeloureteroscopy: Guide tube method for its introduction into the ureter. J Urol, 1974; 112:176–178.
2.
AssimosD, KrambeckA, MillerNL, et al.Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, Part I. J Urol, 2016; 196:1153–1160.
3.
RehmanJ, MongaM, LandmanJ, et al.Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths. Urology, 2003; 61:713–718.
4.
GridleyCM, KnudsenBE. Digital ureteroscopes: Technology update. Res Rep Urol, 2017; 9:19–25.
5.
TokasT, HerrmannTRW, SkolarikosA, Nagele U; Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group. Pressure matters: Intrarenal pressures during normal and pathological conditions, and impact of increased values to renal physiology. World J Urol, 2019; 37:125–131.
6.
KreydinEI, EisnerBH. Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery. Nat Rev Urol, 2013; 10:598–605.
7.
TraxerO, Wendt-NordahlG, SodhaH, et al.Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol, 2015; 33:2137–2144.
8.
PaonessaJE, GnessinE, BhojaniN, WilliamsJC, LingemanJE. Preoperative bladder urine culture as a predictor of intraoperative stone culture results: Clinical implications and relationship to stone composition. J Urol, 2016; 196:769–774.
9.
Walton-DiazA, VinayJI, BarahonaJ, et al.Concordance of renal stone culture: PMUC, RPUC, RSC and post-PCNL sepsis-a non-randomized prospective observation cohort study. Int Urol Nephrol, 2017; 49:31–35.
10.
QiangX-H, YuT-O, LiY-N, ZhouL-X. Prognosis risk of urosepsis in critical care medicine: A prospective observational study. Biomed Res Int, 2016; 2016:9028924.
11.
HyamsES, BruhnA, LipkinM, ShahO. Heterogeneity in the reporting of disease characteristics and treatment outcomes in studies evaluating treatments for nephrolithiasis. J Endourol, 2010; 24:1411–1414.
12.
SmithRC, VergaM, McCarthyS, RosenfieldAT. Diagnosis of acute flank pain: Value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1996; 166:97–101.
13.
HumphreysMR, ShahOD, MongaM, et al.Dusting versus basketing during ureteroscopy-which technique is more efficacious? A prospective multicenter trial from the EDGE Research Consortium. J Urol, 2018; 199:1272–1276.
14.
El-NahasAR, AlmousawiS, AlqattanY, AlqadriIM, Al-ShaijiTF, Al-TerkiA. Dusting versus fragmentation for renal stones during flexible ureteroscopy. Arab J Urol, 2019; 17:138–142.
15.
KourambasJ, ByrneRR, PremingerGM. Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy. J Urol, 2001; 165:789–793.
16.
Al-QahtaniSM, LetendreJ, ThomasA, NatalinR, SaussezT, TraxerO. Which ureteral access sheath is compatible with your flexible ureteroscope. J Endourol, 2014; 28:286–290.
17.
BorofskyMS, DauwCA, YorkNE, HoovlerC, LingemanJE. Comprehensive costs associated with fiberoptic and digital flexible ureteroscopes at a High Volume Teaching Hospital. Urol Pract, 2017; 4:187–192.
18.
L'esperanceJO, EkeruoWO, ScalesCD, et al.Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology, 2005; 66:252–255.
19.
BredaA, EmilianiE, MillanF, et al.The new concept of ureteral access sheath with guidewire disengagement: One wire does it all. World J Urol, 2016; 34:603–606.
20.
KourambasJ, DelvecchioFC, MunverR, PremingerGM. Nitinol stone retrieval-assisted ureteroscopic management of lower pole renal calculi. Urology, 2000; 56:935–939.
21.
TraxerO, KellerEX. Thulium fiber laser: The new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol, 2020; 38:1883–1894.
22.
OkhunovZ, JiangP, AfyouniAS, et al.Caveat Emptor: The Heat Is “ON”—An in vivo evaluation of the thulium fiber laser and temperature changes in the porcine kidney during dusting and fragmentation modes. J Endourol, 2021; 35:1716–1722.
23.
TraxerO, ThomasA. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol, 2013; 189:580–584.
24.
SternKL, LoftusCJ, DoiziS, TraxerO, MongaM. A prospective study analyzing the association between high-grade ureteral access sheath injuries and the formation of ureteral strictures. Urology, 2019; 128:38–41.
25.
DelvecchioFC, AugeBK, BrizuelaRM, et al.Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral access sheath. Urology, 2003; 61:518–522; discussion 522.
26.
De ConinckV, KellerEX, Rodríguez-MonsalveM, AudouinM, DoiziS, TraxerO. Systematic review of ureteral access sheaths: Facts and myths. BJU Int, 2018; 122:959–969.
27.
LallasCD, AugeBK, RajGV, et al.Laser Doppler flowmetric determination of ureteral blood flow after ureteral access sheath placement. J Endourol, 2002; 16:583–590.