CapelloSA, BoczkoJ, PatelHR, JosephJV. Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol, 2007; 21:1199–1202.
2.
AndersonC, AyresB, IssaR, et al.Comparison with transperitoneal technique. World J ClinUrol, 2013; 2:3–9.
3.
KaoukJ, ValeroR, SawczynG, GaristoJ. Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Initial experience and description of technique. BJU Int, 2020; 125:182–189.
4.
LenfantL, GaristoJ, SawczynG, et al.Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using single-port perineal approach: Technique and single-surgeon matched-paired comparative outcomes. Eur Urol, 2021; 79:384–392.
5.
AwadH, WalkerCM, ShaikhM, DimitrovaGT, AbazaR, O'HaraJ. Anesthetic considerations for robotic prostatectomy: A review of the literature. J ClinAnesth, 2012; 24:494–504.
6.
ToshP, KrishnankuttySV, RajanS, NairHM, PuthanveettilN, KumarL. Does restrictive fluid strategy during robotic pelvic surgeries obtund intraoperative rise in intraocular pressure?. Anesth Essays Res, 2018; 12:155–158.
7.
AbazaR. Should patients with glaucoma be offered robotic prostatectomy?. J Urol, 2011; 185(4S):e312.
8.
FerroniMC, AbazaR. Feasibility of robot-assisted prostatectomy performed at ultra-low pneumoperitoneum pressure of 6 mmHg and comparison of clinical outcomes vs standard pressure of 15 mmHg. BJU Int, 2019; 124:308–313.
9.
AbazaR, KoganP, MartinezO. Impact of the COVID-19 crisis on same-day discharge after robotic urologic surgery. Urology, 2021; 149:40–45.
10.
AbazaR, MartinezO, MurphyC, UrkmezA, DavisJ. Adoption of single-port robotic prostatectomy: Two alternative strategies. J Endourol, 2020; 34:1230–1234.
