Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-12
Response to Maheshwari and Arora re: “Safety and Efficacy of Emergency Ureteroscopy with Intracorporeal Lithotripsy in Patients Presented with Urinary Tract Infection with Mild Sepsis” by Bakr and Abdelhalim
MaheshwariPN, AroraA. Re: “Safety and efficacy of emergency ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy in patients presented with urinary tract infection with mild sepsis” by Bakr and Abdelhalim. J Endourol, 2020; 34:1272.
2.
BakrM, AbdelhalimKM. Safety and efficacy of emergency ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy in patients presented with urinary tract infection with mild sepsis. J Endourol, 2020; 34:262–266.
3.
BoneRC, BalkRA, CerraetFB, et al.Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest, 1992; 101:1644–1655.
4.
JiangY, LiJ, ZhangY, et al.Clinical situations of bacteriology and prognosis in patients with urosepsis. Biomed Res Int, 2019; 3080827.
5.
SingerM, DeutschmanCS, SeymourCW, et al.The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA, 2016; 315:801–810.
6.
MachadoFR, AssunçãoMS, CavalcantiAB, et al.Getting a consensus: Advantages and disadvantages of Sepsis 3 in the context of middle-income settings. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva, 2016; 28:361–365.
7.
RelloJ, Leblebicioglu H; members ofESGCIP. Sepsis and septic shock in low-income and middle-income countries: Need for a different paradigm. Int J Infect, 2016; 48:120–122.
8.
BesenBA, RomanoTG, NassarAPJr, et al.Sepsis-3 definitions predict ICU mortality in a low-middle-income country. Ann Intensive Care, 2016; 6:107.
9.
PeakeSL, DelaneyA, BaileyM, et al.ARISE investigators. Potential impact of the 2016 consensus definitions of sepsis and septic shock on future sepsis research. Ann Emerg Med, 2017; 70:553–561.
10.
Giamarellos-BourboulisEJ, TsaganosT, TsangarisI, et al.Validation of the new Sepsis-3 definitions: Proposal for improvement in early risk identification. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2017; 23:104–109.
11.
WilliamsJM, GreensladeJH, McKenzieJV, et al.Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, quick sequential organ function assessment, and organ dysfunction: Insights from a prospective database of ED patients with infection. Chest, 2017; 151:586–596.
12.
Daniel JHenning, PuskarichMA, SelfWH, et al.An emergency department validation of the sep-3 sepsis and septic shock definitions and comparison with 1992 consensus definitions. Ann Emerg Med, 2017; 70:544–552.
13.
Bermejo-MartinJF, Martín-FernandezM, AlmansaR. Pre-sepsis: A necessary concept to complete the SEPSIS-3 picture?. J Crit Care, 2017; 44:148.
14.
SartelliM, KlugerY, AnsaloniL, et al.Raising concerns about the sepsis-3 definitions. World J Emerg Surg, 2018; 25;13:6.
15.
MachadoFR, CavalcantiAB, MonteiroMB, et al.Predictive accuracy of the quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment score in Brazil. A prospective multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2020; 201:789–798.
16.
SchmidtGA, MandelJ. Evaluation and management of suspected sepsis and septic shock in adults. Literature review current through. 2020. WoltersKluwer. www.uptodate.com (accessed September8, 2020).
17.
YoussefRF, NeisiusA, GoldsmithZG, et al.Clinical outcomes after ureteroscopic lithotripsy in patients who initially presented with urosepsis: Matched pair comparison with elective ureteroscopy. J Endourol, 2014; 28:1439–1443.
18.
MaheshwariP, OkwiN, PoreAP. Symmetrical peripheral gangrene of all four limbs: An unusual complication of ureteroscopy. Indian J Urol, 2019; 35:78–80.
19.
BorofskyMS, WalterD, ShahO, et al.Surgical decompression is associated with decreased mortality in patients with sepsis and ureteral calculi. J Urol, 2013; 189:946–951.
20.
EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress, Amsterdam 2020. Arnhem, The Netherlands: EAU Guidelines Office, 2020.
