Restricted accessLetterFirst published online 2020-12
Response to Loughlin re: “Ambulatory-Based Bladder Outlet Procedures Offer Significant Cost Savings and Comparable 30-Day Outcomes Relative to Inpatient Surgery” by Nguyen et al.
LoughlinKR. Editorial comment on: Ambulatory-based bladder outlet procedures offer significant cost savings and comparable 30-day outcomes relative to inpatient surgery by Nguyen et al. J Endourol, 2020; 34:1255–1257.
2.
NguyenD-D, MarcheseM, OzambelaM, et al.Ambulatory-based bladder outlet procedures offer significant cost savings and comparable 30-day outcomes relative to inpatient procedures. J Endourol, 2020; 34:1248–1254.
3.
NguyenD-D, ZornKC, BhojaniN. Cost analysis of surgical options for benign disease: Implications for value. Can Urol Assoc J, 2018; 12:388.
4.
ChughtaiB, FriedlanderDF, TrinhQD. Does low-value care affect urologists?. Eur Urol, 2017; 71:304–305.
5.
FriedlanderDF, KrimphoveMJ, ColeAP, et al.Care setting as a modifiable predictor of perioperative cost and outcomes following elective urinary stone surgery. Urol Pract, 2020; 7:259–265.
6.
FriedlanderDF, KrimphoveMJ, ColeAP, et al. Where is the value in ambulatory versus inpatient surgery? Ann Surg 2019. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003578.
Delivery innovations. Health Aff 2017;36:392–393. DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0026.
9.
HsuJ, PriceM, VogeliC, et al.Bending the spending curve by altering care delivery patterns: The role of care management within a pioneer ACO. Health Aff, 2017; 36:876–884.