Editorial Comment on: “Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Fluoroless Ureteroscopy and Conventional Ureteroscopy in the Management of Ureteral and Renal Stones” by Subiela et al.
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2021
Editorial Comment on: “Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Fluoroless Ureteroscopy and Conventional Ureteroscopy in the Management of Ureteral and Renal Stones” by Subiela et al.
SubielaJD, KanashiroA, EmilianiE, et al.Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing fluoroless ureteroscopy and conventional ureteroscopy in the management of ureteral and renal stones. J Endourol, 2021; 35:417–428.
2.
RebuckDA, MacejkoA, BhalaniV, et al.The natural history of renal stone fragments following ureteroscopy. Urology, 2011; 77:564–568.
3.
YorkNE, ZhengM, ElmansyHM, et al.Stone-free outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy for renal calculi utilizing computed tomography imaging. Urology, 2019; 124:52–56.
4.
RippelCA, NikkelL, LinYK, et al.Residual fragments following ureteroscopic lithotripsy: incidence and predictors on postoperative computerized tomography. J. Urol, 2012; 188:2246–2251.
