Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-06
Editorial Comment on: Influence of Lower Pole Infundibulopelvic Angle on Success of Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Renal Stones by Dresner et al. (J Endourol 2020;34(6):655–660;DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0720)
DresnerSL, IremashviliV, BestSL, HedicanySP, NakadaSY. Influence of lower pole infundibulopelvic angle on success of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for the treatment of renal stones. J Endourol, 2020; 34:655–660.
2.
PearleMS. Is ureteroscopy as good as we think?. J Urol, 2016; 195(4 Pt 1):823–824.
3.
DauwCA, GhaniKR, QiJ, KimT, TelangJ, SeifmanB, HollingsworthJM. Variable use of postoperative imaging following ureteroscopy: Results from a statewide quality improvement collaborative. Urology, 2020; 136:63–69.
4.
XuY, LyuJL. The value of three‐dimensional helical computed tomography for the retrograde flexible ureteronephroscopy in the treatment of lower pole calyx stones. Chronic Dis Transl Med, 2016; 2:42–47.
5.
ProiettiS, Rodríguez‐SocarrásME, EisnerB, De ConinckV, SoferM, SaittaG, Rodriguez‐MonsalveM, D'OrtaC, et al.Supine PCNL: Tips and tricks. Transl Androl Urol, 2019; 8(Suppl 4):S381–S388.
6.
ProiettiS, GiustiG, DesaiM, GanpuleAP. A critical review of miniaturized PCNL: Is smaller better?. Eur Urol Focus, 2017; 3:56–61.
