Editorial Comment on: Impact of Case Volume on Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Data from the National Shock Wave Lithotripsy Database of New Zealand by Alexander et al. (From: Alexander CE,Gowland S,Cadwallader J,et al. J Endourol 2019;33:655–659;DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0122)
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online August, 2019
Editorial Comment on: Impact of Case Volume on Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Data from the National Shock Wave Lithotripsy Database of New Zealand by Alexander et al. (From: Alexander CE,Gowland S,Cadwallader J,et al. J Endourol 2019;33:655–659;DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0122)
PaceKT, GhiculeteD, HarjuM, et al.Shockwave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: A randomized, double blinded trial. J Urol, 2005:174L:595–599.
2.
LantzAG, McKayJ, OrdonM, PaceKT, MongaM, HoneyRJ. Shockwave lithotripsy practice pattern variations among and between American and Canadian urologists: In Support of Guidelines. J Endourol, 2016; 30:918–922.
