Editorial Comment on: The Impact of Dust and Confinement on Fragmentation of Kidney Stones by Shockwave Lithotripsy in Tissue Phantoms by Randad et al. (From: Randad A,Ahn J,Bailey MR,et al. J Endourol 2019;33:400–406;DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0516)
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2019
Editorial Comment on: The Impact of Dust and Confinement on Fragmentation of Kidney Stones by Shockwave Lithotripsy in Tissue Phantoms by Randad et al. (From: Randad A,Ahn J,Bailey MR,et al. J Endourol 2019;33:400–406;DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0516)
QinJ, SimmonsWN, SankinG, ZhongP. Effect of lithotripter focal width on stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy. J Acoust Soc Am, 2010; 127:2635–2645.
2.
FrankS, LautzJ, SankinGN, SzeriAJ. Zhong P. Bubble proliferation or dissolution of cavitation nuclei in the beam path of a shock-wave lithotripter. Phys Rev Appl, 2015; 3:034002.
3.
LautzJ, SankinG, ZhongP. Turbulent water coupling in shock wave lithotripsy. Phys Med Biol, 2013; 58:735–748.
4.
Alavi TamaddoniH, RobertsWW, DuryeaAP, CainCA, HallTL. Enhanced high-rate shockwave lithotripsy stone comminution in an in vivo porcine model using acoustic bubble coalescence. J Endourol, 2016; 30:1321–1325.
5.
NeisiusA, SmithN, SankinG, et al.Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014; 111:E1167–E1175.
6.
MaloneyME, MarguetCG, ZhouYF, et al.Progressive increase of lithotripter output produces better in vivo stone comminution. J Endourol, 2006; 20:603–606.
7.
EvanAP, McAteerJA, ConnorsBA, BlomgrenPM, LingemanJE. Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery. BJU Int, 2007; 100:624–628.
8.
LingemanJE, McAteerJA, GnessinE, EvanAP. Shock wave lithotripsy: Advances in technology and technique. Nat Rev Urol, 2009; 6:660–670.
