Letter to the Editor RE: Hirose et al.,Safety and Efficacy of Retroperitoneoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: Comparison of Early Complication,Donor and Recipient Outcome with Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy Living Donor Nephrectomy (From: Hirose T,Hotta K,Iwami D,et al. J Endourol 2018;32:1120–1124;DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0669)
Restricted accessLetterFirst published online June, 2019
Letter to the Editor RE: Hirose et al.,Safety and Efficacy of Retroperitoneoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: Comparison of Early Complication,Donor and Recipient Outcome with Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy Living Donor Nephrectomy (From: Hirose T,Hotta K,Iwami D,et al. J Endourol 2018;32:1120–1124;DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0669)
HiroseT, HottaK, IwamiD, HaradaH, MoritaK, TanabeT, SasakiH, FukuzawaN, SekiT, ShinoharaN. Safety and efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: Comparison of early complication, donor, and recipient outcome with hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. J Endourol, 2018; 32:1120–1124.
2.
ModiP, KadamG, DevraA. Obtaining cuff of inferior vena cava by use of the Endo-TA stapler in retroperitoneoscopic right-side donor nephrectomy. Urology, 2007; 69:832–834.
3.
AraiK, NishiyamaT, HaraN, KasaharaT, SaitoK, TakahashiK. Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy with a gel-sealed hand-assist access device. BMC Urol, 2013; 13:7.
