Restricted accessLetterFirst published online 2018-04
Response to Cao et al. re: Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Resection and Enucleation in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors According to the Surface-Intermediate-Base Margin Score: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
LongoN, MinerviniA, AntonelliA, et al.Simple enucleation versus standard partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal masses: Perioperative outcomes based on a matched-pair comparison of 396 patients (RECORd project). Eur J Surg Oncol, 2014; 40:762–768.
2.
DongW, LinT, LiF, et al.Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma: Comparison of two resection techniques in a multi-institutional propensity score-matching analysis. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016; 23:1395–1402.
3.
MinerviniA, TuccioA, MasieriL, et al.Endoscopic robot-assisted simple enucleation (ERASE) for clinical T1 renal masses: Description of the technique and early postoperative results. Surg Endosc, 2015; 29:1241–1249.
4.
TakagiT, KondoT, TachibanaH, et al.Comparison of surgical outcomes between resection and enucleation in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors according to the surface-intermediate-base margin score: A propensity score-matched study. J Endourol, 2017; 31:756–761.
