Editorial Comment on: Surgical Approach Does Not Impact Margin Status After Partial Nephrectomy for Large Renal Masses by Ayangbesan et al. (From: Ayangbesan A,Golombos DM,Golan R,et al. J Endourol 2019;33:50–60;DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0144)
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2019
Editorial Comment on: Surgical Approach Does Not Impact Margin Status After Partial Nephrectomy for Large Renal Masses by Ayangbesan et al. (From: Ayangbesan A,Golombos DM,Golan R,et al. J Endourol 2019;33:50–60;DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0144)
XiaL, WangX, XuT, GuzzoTJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies reporting perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol, 2017; 31:893–909.
2.
GaristoJ, BertoloR, DagenaisJ, SagalovichD, FareedK, FerganyA, SteinR, KaoukJ. Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses: Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes. Urol Oncol, 2018; 36:471.e1–471.e9.
3.
BertoloR, AutorinoR, SimoneG, et al.Outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for clinical T2 renal tumors: A multicenter analysis (ROSULA Collaborative Group). Eur Urol, 2018; 74:226–232.
4.
ParekhDJ, ReisIM, CastleEP, et al.Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): An open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet, 2018; 391:2525–2536.
5.
YaxleyJW, CoughlinGD, ChambersSK, et al.Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: Early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet, 2016; 388:1057–1066.
