Editorial Comment on: In Vitro Evaluation of Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Practical Comparison for Patient-Centered Approach (From: Marchini GS,Batagello CA,Monga M,et al. J Endourol 2018;32:184–191)
Restricted accessEditorialFirst published online April, 2018
Editorial Comment on: In Vitro Evaluation of Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Practical Comparison for Patient-Centered Approach (From: Marchini GS,Batagello CA,Monga M,et al. J Endourol 2018;32:184–191)
BagleyDH. Flexible ureteropyeloscopy with modular, “disposable” endoscope. Urology, 1987; 29:296–300.
2.
EmilianiE, TraxerO. Single use and disposable flexible ureteroscopes. Curr Opin Urol, 2017; 27:176–181.
3.
DavisNF, QuinlanMR, BrowneC, et al.Single-use flexible ureteropyeloscopy: A systematic review. World J Urol, 2017 [Epub ahead of print]; doi:10.1007/s00345-017-2131-4.
4.
DolziS, KamphuisG, GuistiG, et al.First clinical evaluation of single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue™): A European prospective multicentric feasibility study. World J Urol, 2016; 35:809–818.
5.
UsawachintachitM, IsaacsonDS, TaguchiK, et al.A prospective case-control study comparing LithoVue, a single-use, flexible disposable ureteroscope, with flexible, reusable fiber-optic ureteroscopes. J Endourol, 2017; 31:468–475.
6.
TaguchiK, UsawachintachitM, TzouDT, et al.Micro-costing analysis demonstrates comparable costs for LithoVue compared to reusable flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes. J Endourol, 2017 [Epub ahead of print]; doi:10.1089/end.2017.0523.
