Abstract
Objective:
To assess the clinical efficacy of dual-lumen catheter technique in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in terms of stone-free rate.
Methods:
The data of 172 patients who underwent RIRS for renal stones between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into two groups depending on whether the dual-lumen catheter technique was used (group 1, n = 25) or not (group 2, n = 147) during RIRS. In turn, all patients of group 1 were compared with those of group 2 using propensity score analysis methods. Clinical variables, including post-RIRS residual fragments (RFs) (≥2 mm) and dusts (sandy stones) (≤1 mm), were compared between both groups. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the predictors of postoperative RFs and dusts.
Results:
According to propensity score analysis, no other clinical variables were significantly different between the two groups, except the dust-free rate was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (92% vs 40%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the performance of dual-lumen catheter technique was an independent predictor of the absence of dusts after RIRS (odds ratio [OR], 0.040; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.070–0.220). In addition, on performing multivariate analyses in another matched population, it was found that although the technique adversely affected the removal of RFs (OR, 4.711; 95% CI, 1.203–18.447), it showed an excellent effect on the evacuation of dusts (OR, 0.049; 95% CI, 0.007–0.347).
Conclusion:
Our analyses suggest that the use of dual-lumen catheter during RIRS can facilitate the evacuation of sandy stones. However, further prospective randomized trials are required to verify the usefulness of this technique in real clinical practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
