Editorial Comment on: In Vitro Comparison of Stone Fragmentation When Using Various Settings with Modern Variable Pulse Holmium Lasers by Bell et al. (From: Bell JR,Penniston KL,Nakada SY,J Endourol 2017;31:1067–1072)
Restricted accessEditorialFirst published online December, 2017
Editorial Comment on: In Vitro Comparison of Stone Fragmentation When Using Various Settings with Modern Variable Pulse Holmium Lasers by Bell et al. (From: Bell JR,Penniston KL,Nakada SY,J Endourol 2017;31:1067–1072)
LeeH, RyanRT, TeichmanJMH, et al.Effect of lithotripsy on Holmium:YAG optical beam profile. J Endourol, 2003; 17:63–67.
4.
LeeH, RyanRT, TeichmanJMH, et al.Stone retropulsion during Holmium:YAG lithotripsy. J Urol, 2003; 169:881–885.
5.
KlaverP, de BoorderT, RemAI, LockTMTW, NoordmansHJ. In vitro comparison of renal stone laser treatment using fragmentation and popcorn technique. Lasers Surg Med, 2017; 49:698–704.
6.
AldoukhiAH, HallTL, RoebrtsWW, GhaniKR. Non-contact Holmium laser lithotripsy: Which settings give the best Dusting effect?. J Endourol, 2017; 31(Suppl 2):P9 (abstract MP3-16).
7.
WollinD, WinshipB, JiangR, et al.How do you like your Popcorn? An evaluation of laser settings and location in the efficiency of the popcorn effect. J Endourol, 2017; 31(Suppl 2):P21 (abstract MP12-18).
8.
LiR, RuckleD, KeheilaM, et al.High-frequency dusting versus conventional Holmium laser lithotripsy for intrarenal and ureteral calculi. J Endourol, 2017; 31:272–277.
9.
FinleyDS, PetersenJ, AbdehshehidC, et al.Effect of Holmium:YAG laser pulse width on lithotripsy retropulsion in vitro. J Endourol, 2005; 19:1041–1044.
10.
KangHW, LeeH, TeichmanJM, OhJ, KimK, WelchAJ. Dependence of calculus retropulsion on pulse duration during Ho:YAG lithotripsy. Lasers Surg Med, 2006; 38:762–772.
11.
CorbinNS, TeichmanJMH, NguyenT, et al.Laser lithotripsy and cyanide. J Endourol, 2000; 14:169–173.
