Abstract
Purpose:
To report early operative outcomes and assess continence in 100 consecutive patients who underwent Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP).
Materials and Methods:
This was a prospective, single-center, consecutive case series of 100 and 100 patients undergoing a Retzius-sparing and a conventional RALP, respectively, by a single surgeon between March 2015 and April 2017.
Results:
Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. The Retzius-sparing approach required significantly less console time (120.0 minutes vs 144.0 minutes, p < 0.001). There were no differences between intra- and post-operative complication rates, and hospital length of stay was similar in the two groups. Incidence of positive surgical margins was nonsignificantly different between the two groups, with 17% and 13% of pT2 patients and 49% and 48% of pT3 patients in the Retzius-sparing and conventional groups, respectively. Patients in the Retzius-sparing group had significantly superior rates of achieving post-operative urinary continence (log-rank test: p < 0.001), with 20% of patients continent within the first month, compared with 8% of patients in the conventional group. The mean number of pads per day needed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-operatively was also significantly lower in the Retzius-sparing group.
Conclusions:
Retzius-sparing RALP requires shorter console time, is oncologically safe, and leads to significantly superior continence outcomes compared with conventional RALP.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
