Is Off Clamp Always Beneficial During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy? A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Clamp Technique in Patients with Two Kidneys

Abstract

Objective:

The majority of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN) present with a clinical T1a tumor with both kidneys present. Some groups have advocated using off-clamp (Off-C) techniques to eliminate warm ischemia whenever possible, even when elective. We evaluated whether Off-C technique during robotic PN (RPN) provides any functional benefit over main arterial clamping (MAC) in these patients.

Subjects/Patients and Methods:

A total of 351 patients with a R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (RNS) <10, T1a tumor, and two kidneys who underwent RPN from five high-volume surgeons between 2008 and 2016 were retrospectively identified from a multi-institutional database. MAC and Off-C patients were 2 to 1 nearest neighbor propensity score matched on tumor size, RNS, % endophytic, tumor location, age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs), and surgeon performing the RPN. Preoperative, surgical, and postoperative outcomes were compared.

Results:

After propensity score matching, 82 MAC and 41 Off-C RPN patients were compared with no remaining statistically significant differences in baseline demographic or tumor-specific characteristics, including tumor size (p = 0.203) or RNS (p = 0.744). There were no significant differences in complications (p = 0.141), positive surgical margins (p = 0.625), or non-neoplastic parenchymal volume removed (p = 0.138). Off-C RPN had significantly higher estimated blood loss (100 mL vs 50 mL, p < 0.001), but no increased rate of transfusion (p = 0.328). There were no significant differences in rates of acute kidney injury (p = 0.132) nor percentage change in eGFRs (p = 0.763) at discharge. Freedom from progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage was 87.7% for MAC and 91.1% for Off-C at 12 months. The percentage change in eGFRs (p = 0.457) and CKD stage progression (p = 0.866) was not different at last follow-up (median 9.2 months).

Conclusion:

Our data showed that the use of Off-C RPN marginally increased blood loss without providing a renal function benefit. In two-kidney patients presenting with a T1a renal tumor, Off-C RPN may not be necessary.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lane

, Russo

, Uzzo

, et al. Comparison of cold and warm ischemia during partial nephrectomy in 660 solitary kidneys reveals predominant role of nonmodifiable factors in determining ultimate renal function. J Urol, 2011; 185:421–427.

Kotamarti

, Rothberg

, Danzig

, et al. Increasing volume of non-neoplastic parenchyma in partial nephrectomy specimens is associated with chronic kidney disease upstaging. Clin Genitourin Cancer, 2015; 13:239–243.

Thompson

, Lane

, Lohse

, et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol, 2010; 58:340–345.

Thompson

, Lane

, Lohse

, et al. Comparison of warm ischemia versus no ischemia during partial nephrectomy on a solitary kidney. Eur Urol, 2010; 58:331–336.

George

, Herati

, Srinivasan

, et al. Perioperative outcomes of off-clamp vs complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int, 2013; 111:E235–E241.

Wszolek

, Kenney

, Lee

, Libertino

. Comparison of hilar clamping and non-hilar clamping partial nephrectomy for tumours involving a solitary kidney. BJU Int, 2011; 107:1886–1892.

Porpiglia

, Bertolo

, Amparore

, et al. Evaluation of functional outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using renal scintigraphy: Clamped vs clampless technique. BJU Int, 2015; 115:606–612.

Kaczmarek

, Tanagho

, Hillyer

, et al. Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy preserves renal function: A multi-institutional propensity score analysis. Eur Urol, 2013; 64:988–993.

Lane

, Campbell

, Demirjian

, et al. Surgically induced chronic kidney disease may be associated with a lower risk of progression and mortality than medical chronic kidney disease. J Urol, 2013; 189:1649–1655.

10.

Jorns

, Thiel

, Lohse

, et al. Three-dimensional tumour volume and cancer-specific survival for patients undergoing nephrectomy to treat pT1 clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int, 2012; 110:956–960.

11.

Levey

, Bosch

, Lewis

, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: A new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med, 1999; 130:461–470.

12.

Bellomo

, Ronco

, Kellum

, et al. Acute renal failure—Definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: The Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care, 2004; 8:R204–R212.

13.

Rassen

, Shelat

, Myers

, et al. One-to-many propensity score matching in cohort studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2012; 21(SUPPL.2):69–80.

14.

, Imai

, King

, et al. MatchIt : Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw, 2011; 42:1–28.

15.

Campbell

, Uzzo

, Allaf

, et al. Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA Guideline. J Urol, 2017; 198:520–529.

16.

Lieberman

, Barod

, Dalela

, et al. Use of main renal artery clamping predominates over minimal clamping techniques during robotic partial nephrectomy for complex tumors. J Endourol, 2017; 31:149–152.

17.

Paulucci

, Rosen

, Sfakianos

, et al. Selective arterial clamping does not improve outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A propensity-score analysis of patients without impaired renal function. BJU Int, 2017; 119:430–435.

18.

Tanagho

, Bhayani

, Sandhu

, et al. Renal functional and perioperative outcomes of off-clamp versus clamped robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Matched cohort study. Urology, 2012; 80:838–843.

19.

Mouracade

, Dagenais

, Kara

, et al. MP49–17 robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for selected renal mass using off-clamp approach offered renal functional advantage over on-clamp. J Urol, 2017; 197:e654 (Abstract).

20.

Komninos

, Shin

, Tuliao

, et al. Renal function is the same 6 months after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy regardless of clamp technique: Analysis of outcomes for off-clamp, selective arterial clamp and main artery clamp techniques, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. BJU Int, 2015; 115:921–928.

21.

Spencer Krane

, Mufarrij

, et al. Comparison of clamping technique in robotic partial nephrectomy: Does unclamped partial nephrectomy improve perioperative outcomes and renal function?. Can J Urol, 2013; 20:6662–6667.

22.

Liu

, Li

, Chen

, et al. Off-clamp versus complete hilar control partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol, 2014; 28:567–576.

23.

George

, Herati

, Rais-Bahrami

, et al. Off-clamp partial nephrectomy preserves long-term renal function. J Urol, 2011; 185(4 SUPPL. 1):e614.

24.

Shah

, George

, Moreira

, et al. To clamp or not to clamp? Long-term functional outcomes for elective off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int, 2016; 117:293–299.

25.

Trehan

. Comparison of off-clamp partial nephrectomy and on-clamp partial nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int, 2014; 93:125–134.

26.

Kaouk

, Samarasekera

, Krishnan

, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy with intracorporeal renal hypothermia using ice slush. Urology, 2014; 84:712–718.

27.

Levey

. National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med, 2003; 139:137.