De la RosetteJ, DenstedtJ, GeavleteP, et al.The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: Indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol, 2014; 28:131–139.
2.
DaelsFPJ, GaizauskasA, RiojaJ, et al.Age-related prevalence of diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and anticoagulation therapy use in a urolithiasis population and their effect on outcomes: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol, 2015; 33:859–864.
3.
AssimosD, CrisciA, CulkinD, et al.Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteric and renal stone treatment: Results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) Ureteroscopy (URS) Global Study. BJU Int, 2015. DOI:10.1111/bju.13250.
4.
TraxerO, Wendt-NordahlG, SodhaH, et al.Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol, 2015; 33:2137–2144.
5.
MartovA, GravasS, EtemadianM, et al.Postoperative infection rates in patients with a negative baseline urine culture undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal: A matched case–control analysis on antibiotic prophylaxis from the CROES URS global study. J Endourol, 2015; 29:171–180.
6.
Perez CastroE, OstherPJS, JingaV, et al.Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study. Eur Urol, 2014; 66:102–109.
7.
SkolarikosA, GrossAJ, KrebsA, et al.Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy for solitary renal stones in the CROES URS global study. J Urol, 2015; 194:137–143.
8.
KandasamiSV, MamoulakisC, El-NahasAR, et al.Impact of case volume on outcomes of ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study. Eur Urol, 2014; 66:1046–1051.
