Di PierroGB, BaumeisterP, StuckiP, et al.A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol, 2011; 59:1–6.
2.
PorpigliaF, MorraI, Lucci ChiarissiM, et al.Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol, 2013; 63:606–614.
3.
HagaN, OgawaS, YabeM, et al.Factors contributing to early recovery of urinary continence analyzed by pre- and postoperative pelvic anatomical features at robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol, 2015; 29:683–690.
4.
SchlommT. Editorial comment to preservation of the smooth muscular internal (vesical) sphincter and of the proximal urethra for the early recovery of urinary continence after retropubic radical prostatectomy: A prospective case-control study. Int J Urol, 2014; 21:162.
5.
HagaN, OgawaS, YabeM, et al.Association between postoperative pelvic anatomic features on magnetic resonance imaging and lower tract urinary symptoms after radical prostatectomy. Urology, 2014; 84:642–649.
6.
BrunocillaE, PultroneC, PernettiR, et al.Preservation of the smooth muscular internal (vesical) sphincter and of the proximal urethra during retropubic radical prostatectomy: Description of the technique. Int J Urol, 2012; 19:783–785.
