Abstract
Objective:
To assess and compare the applicability of the Resorlu-Unsal Stone Score (RUSS) and the Modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity (S-ReSC) score for flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS).
Patients and Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed the hospital files of 719 patients who had been treated with f-URS for kidney stone at two referral centers between July 2012 and December 2015. The RUSS and Modified S-ReSC scores were calculated by the same surgeon for each patient by using imaging methods and were compared as to their predictive capability for postoperative success.
Results:
A total of 339 patients (168 men and 171 women) with a mean age of 46.5 ± 16.1 (range:1–86) years and a mean body mass index of 27.1 ± 4.1 (range: 12.8–38.5) were included in the study. The mean stone size was 14.4 ± 5.4 (4–40) mm, and the mean stone surface area was 145.3 ± 76.8 (20–658) mm2. The overall stone-free rate was 70.1%. The mean scores were 0.5 ± 0.7 and 1.8 ± 1.1 for the RUSS and Modified S-ReSC, respectively. In the logistic regression analysis, musculoskeletal deformity, stone size, and the RUSS were identified as independent predictive factors affecting stone-free status (p: 0, p: 0.014, p: 0.048, respectively). Among these parameters, the RUSS had the highest predictive capability (area under curve value 0.65, [95% confidence interval 589, 721]).
Conclusions:
Stone size, presence of musculoskeletal abnormalities, and the RUSS score are important factors affecting SF status after f-URS. Despite the RUSS being an independent predictive factor for SF status, more comprehensive systems with higher predictive capability are needed for clinical usage and academic reporting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
