In recent years, laparoscopy and robot-assisted procedures have become more commonplace in urology. Incorporation of these techniques into clinical practice requires extensive knowledge of the surgical approaches and complex instrumentation unique to minimally invasive surgery. In this review, focus will be directed to laparoscopic trocars including differing subtypes, placement in select urologic procedures, and proper use with emphasis on the avoidance of complications. Differing methods for the development of pneumoperitoneum and the associated risks of each will be discussed. The aim of this article is to provide a complete review of laparoscopic trocar use for the practicing urologist.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DarouicheRO, WallMJ, ItaniKMF, et al.Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Eng J Med, 2010; 362:18–26.
2.
DumvilleJC, McFarlaneE, EdwardsP, et al.Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015; 4:Art. No.:CD003949.
3.
NuzzoG, GiulianteF, TebalaGD, et al.Routine use of an open technique in laparoscopic operations. J Am Coll Surg, 1997; 184:58–62.
4.
JansenFW, KolkmanW, BakkumEA, et al.Complications of laparoscopy: An inquiry about closed-versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004; 190:634–638.
5.
MagrinaJF. Complications of laparoscopic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2002; 45:469–480.
KroftJ, AnejaA, TyrwhittJ, et al.Laparoscopic peritoneal entry preferences among Canadian gynaecologists. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2009; 31:641–648.
8.
MolloyD, KalooPD, CooperM, et al.Laparoscopic entry: A literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol, 2002; 42:246–254.
9.
PerunovicRM, ScepanovicRP, StevanovicRD, et al.Complications during the establishment of laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech, 2009; 12:1–6.
10.
AzevedoOC, AzevedoJL, SorbelloAA, et al.Evaluation of tests performed to confirm the position of the Veress needle for creation of pneumoperitoneum in selected patients: A prospective clinical trial. Acta Cir Bras, 2006; 21:385–391.
11.
KreshoverJ, RichstoneL. Laparoscopic renal extirpative surgery. In: BestSL and NakadaSY, eds. Minimally Invasive Urology: An Essential Clinical Guide to Endourology, Laparoscopy, LESS, and Robotics. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 58–87.
12.
TernamianAM. A trocarless, reusable, visual-access cannula for safer laparoscopy: An update. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 1998; 5:197.
13.
LiuCD, McFaddenDW. Laparoscopic port sites do not require fascial closure when non-bladed trocars are used. Am Surg, 2000; 66:853–854.
14.
BrownJA, CanalD, SundaramCP. Optical-access visual obturator trocar entry into desufflated abdomen during laparoscopy: Assessment after 96 cases. J Endourol, 2005; 19:853–855.
15.
HorstmannM, HortonK, KurzM. Prospective comparison between the Airseal® system valve-less trocar and a standard Versaport™ Plus V2 trocar in Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol, 2013; 27:579–582.
16.
HeratiAS, AtallaMA, Rais-BahramiS, et al.A new valve-less trocar for urologic laparoscopy: Initial evaluation. J Endourol, 2009; 23:1535–1539.
17.
HeratiAS, AndonianS, Rais-BahramiS, et al.Use of the valveless trocar system reduces carbon dioxide absorption during laparoscopy when compared with standard trocars. Urology, 2011; 77:1126–1132.
18.
BhoyrulS, MoriT, WayLW. Radially expanding dilatation. A superior method of laparoscopic trocar access. Surg Endosc, 1996; 110:775–778.
19.
BhoyrulS, PayneJ, SteffesB, et al.A randomized prospective study of radially expanding trocars in laparoscopic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg, 2000; 4:392–397.
20.
PodolskyER, St John-DillonL, KingSA, et al.Reduced port surgery: An economical, ecological, educational, and efficient approach to development of single port access surgery. Surg Technol Int, 2010; 20:41–46.
21.
CurcilloPG2nd, PodolskyER, KingSA. The road to reduced port surgery: From single big incisions to single small incisions, and beyond. World J Surg, 2011; 35:1526–1531.
22.
MoriT. Concept of reduced port laparoscopic surgery. In: MoriT and DapriG, eds. Reduced Port Laparoscopic Surgery. Tokyo, Japan: Springer, 2014, p. 67–93.
23.
BergemannJL, HibbertML, Harkins, et al.Omental herniation through a 3-mm umbilical trocar site: Unmasking a hidden umbilical hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg, 1995; 11:171–173.
24.
ElashryO, NakadaSY, Stuart WolfJ, et al.Comparative clinical study of port-closure techniques following laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg, 1996; 183:335–344.
25.
LowryPS, MoonTD, D'AlessandroA, et al.Symptomatic port-site hernia associated with a nonbladed trocar after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Endourol, 2003; 17:493–494.
26.
ShettyA, AdiyatKT. Comparison between hand suture and Carter-Thomason needle closure of port sites in laparoscopy. J Urol, 2014; 11:1768–1771.
27.
LoizidesS, GurusamyKS, NagendranM, et al.Wound infiltration with local anaesthetic agents for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014;3 Art. No.: CD007049.
28.
TuncelA, BalciM, PostaciA, et al.Comparison of different postoperative pain managements in patients submitted to transperitoneal laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery. Int Braz J Urol, 2015; 41:669–675.
29.
BallMW, ReeseAC, MetteeLZ, et al.Safety of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with prior abdominopelvic or inguinal surgery. J Endourol, 2015; 29:192–197.
30.
HasegawaM, MiyajimaA, JinzakiM, et al.Visceral fat is correlated with prolonged operative time in laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy and laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Urology, 2013; 82:1312–1318.
31.
YugeK, MiyajimaA, JinzakiM. How does visceral obesity affect surgical performance in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy?. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2015; 45:373–377.
32.
MilesRH, CarballoRE, PrinzRA, et al.Laparoscopy: The preferred method of cholecystectomy in the morbidly obese. Surgery, 1992; 112:818–822.
33.
VarelaJE, HinjosaMW, NguyenNT. Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg, 2008; 196:218–222.
34.
GeorgeAK, RothwaxJT, HeratiAS, et al.Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy stratified by body mass index. J Endourol, 2015; 29:1011–1017.
35.
KomninosC, TuliaoP, KooKC, et al.Obesity is not associated with increased complications in single-site robotic partial nephrectomy. Yonsei Med J, 2015; 56:382–387.
36.
GuX, ArakiM, WongC. Does elevated body mass index (BMI) affect the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP): A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg, 2014; 12:1055–1060.
37.
GozenAS, AkinY, OzdenE, et al.Impact of body mass index on outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up. Scand J Urol, 2015; 49:70–76.
38.
VilosGA, TernamianA, DempsterJ, et al.Laparoscopic entry: A review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2007; 29:433–465.
39.
KassirR, BlancP, LointierP, et al.Laparoscopic entry techniques in the obese patient: Veress needle, direct trocar insertion, or open entry technique. Obes Surg, 2014; 24:2193–2194.
PhillipsG, GarryR, KumarC, et al.How much gas is required for initial insufflation at laparoscopy?. Gynecol Endosc, 1999; 8:369–374.
42.
FanX, XuK, LinT. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int, 2012; 111:611–621.
43.
RenT, LiuY, ZhaoX, et al.Transperitoneal approach versus retroperitoneal approach: A meta-analysis of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. PLoS One, 2014; 9:e91978.
44.
GhaniKR, PorterJ, MenonM, et al.Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: A step-by-step guide. BJU Int, 2014; 114:311–313.
45.
BishoffJT, AllafME, KirkelsW, et al.Laparoscopic bowel injury: Incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol, 1999; 161:887–890.
46.
Van der VoortM, HeijnsdijkEA, GoumaDJ. Bowel injury as a complication of laparoscopy. Br J Surg, 2004; 91:1253–1258.
47.
VenkateshR, LandmanJ. Laparoscopic complications: Gastrointestinal. In: GillIS, ed. Textbook of Laparoscopic Urology. USA, 2006, pp. 911–922.
48.
BallMW, ReeseAC, Mettee, et al.Safety of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with prior abdominopelvic or inguinal surgery. J Endourol, 2015; 29:192–197.
49.
CanesD, AronM, NguyenMM, et al.Common bile duct injury during urologic laparoscopy. J Endourol, 2008; 22:1483–1484.
50.
AzevedoJL, AzevedoOC, MiyahiraSA, et al.Injuries caused by veress needle insertion for creation of pneumoperitoneum: A systematic literature review. Surg Endosc, 2009; 23:1428–1432.
51.
La ChapelleCF, SwankHA, WesselsME. Trocar types in laparoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015; 12: Art. No.:CD 009814.
52.
ChapronCM, PierreF, LacroixS, et al.Major vascular injuries during gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg, 1997; 185:461–465.
53.
OpitzI, GantertW, GigerU, et al.Bleeding remains a major complication during laparoscopic surgery: Analysis of the SALTS database. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2005; 390:128–133.
54.
HashizumeM, SugimachiK. Needle and trocar injury during laparoscopic surgery in Japan. Surg Endosc, 1997; 11:1198–1201.
55.
DunneN, BoothMI, DehnTC. Establishing pneumoperitoneum: Veress or Hasson? The debate continues. Am R Coll Surg Engl, 2011; 93:22–24.
56.
BonjerHJ, HazebroekEJ, KazemierG, et al.Open versus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg, 1997; 84:599–602.
57.
MerlinTL, HillerJE, MaddernGJ, et al.Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg, 2003; 90:668–679.
58.
SmiforooshN, BasiriA, ZiaeeSAM, et al.Major vascular injury in laparoscopic urology. JSLS, 2014; 18:e2014.00283.
59.
SwankHA, MulderIM, la ChapelleCF, et al.Systematic review of trocar-site hernia. Br J Surg, 2012; 99:315–323.
60.
TonouchiH, OhmoriY, KobayashiM, et al.Trocar site hernia. Arch Surg, 2004; 139:1248–1256.
61.
ChristieMC, MangerJP, KhiyamiAM, et al.Occult radiographically evident port-site hernia after robotic-assisted urologic surgery: Incidence and risk factors. J Endourol, 2016; 30:92–96.
62.
AntoniouSA, Morales-CondeS, AntoniouGA, et al.Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through the umbilicus is associated with a higher incidence of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hernia, 2016; 20:1–10.
63.
MontgomeryJS, JohnstonWK3rd, WolfJSJr.Wound complications after hand assisted laparoscopic surgery. J Urol, 2005; 174:2226–2230.
64.
BuntingDM. Port-site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS, 2010; 14:490–497.
65.
TargaronaEM, BalagueC, KnookMM, et al.Laparoscopic surgery and surgical infection. Br J Surg, 2000; 87:536–544.
66.
Den HoedPT, BoelhouwerRU, VeenHF, et al.Infections and bacteriological data after laparoscopic and open gallbladder surgery. J Hosp Infect, 1998; 39:27–37.
67.
ColizzaS, RossiS, PicardiB, et al.Surgical infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Ceftriaxone versus ceftazidime antibiotic prophylaxis. A prospective study. Chir Ital, 2004; 56:397–402.
68.
WolfSJJr, BennettCJ, DmochowskiRR, et al.Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol, 2008; 179:1379–1390.
69.
KarthikS, AugustineAJ, ShibumonMM, et al.Analysis of laparoscopic port site complications: A descriptive study. J Minim Access Surg, 2013; 9:59–64.
