de la Rosette J . A platform for global endourological research. J Endourol, 2009; 23:1551–1553.

Opondo D , de la Rosette J . CROES survey-based studies: The role of expert opinion in endourologic research. J Endourol, 2013; 27:118–119.

Gliklich R , Dreyer N , Leavy M , eds. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide. 3rd ed. (Prepared by the Outcome DEcIDE Center [Outcome Sciences, Inc., a Quintiles company] under Contract No. 290 2005 00351 TO7.) AHRQ Publication No. 13(14)-EHC111. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2014. Available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/registries-guide-3.cfm Accessed: January 5, 2015 .

Preminger GM , Alken P , Habuchi T , et al. The clinical research office of the endourological society audit committee. J Endourol, 2011; 25:1811–1813.

Mamoulakis C . A plea for higher-quality data for GreenLight laser technology in the context of surgical benign prostatic obstruction trials: The GOLIATH study—fact or fiction in the era of evidence-based urology?. Eur Urol, 2014; 65:943–945.

Mamoulakis C , Ubbink DT , de la Rosette JJ . Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol, 2009; 56:798–809.

Mamoulakis C , Schulze M , Skolarikos A , et al. Reply from Authors re: Alexander Bachmann, Gordon H. Muir, Stephen F. Wyler, Malte Rieken. Surgical benign prostatic hyperplasia trials: The future is now!. Eur Urol., 2013; 63:677–679. Best available evidence in 2012 on bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction: It's about time to decide! Eur Urol. 2013;63:677–680.

Surgical research: The reality and the IDEAL. Lancet, 2009; 374:1037.

Dreyer NA , Garner S . Registries for robust evidence. JAMA, 2009; 302:790–791.

Tan MH , Thomas M , MacEachern MP . Using registries to recruit subjects for clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2014. Epub ahead of print. Doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.12.012.

Concato J , Shah N , Horwitz RI . Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med, 2000; 342:1887–1892.

Guyatt GH , Sackett DL , Sinclair JC , et al. Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence- Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA, 1995; 274:1800–1804.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Methods Reference Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Version 1.0 [Draft posted Oct. 2007]. Rockville, MD. Available at: http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/repFiles/2007_10Dra ftMethodsGuide.pdf Accessed: August 14, 2012 .

Vandenbroucke JP . Observational research, randomised trials, and two views of medical science. PLoS Med, 2008; 5:e67.

Atkins D , Eccles M , Flottorp S , et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res, 2004; 4:38.

Rawlins M . De Testimonio: On the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions. Clin Med, 2008; 8:579–588.