Abstract
Purpose:
To compare fluoroscopy duration, radiation dose, and efficacy of two ultrasound stone localization systems during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment.
Patients and Methods:
Monocentric prospective data were obtained from patients consecutively treated for renal stones using the Sonolith® i-sys (EDAP TMS) lithotripter, with fluoroscopy combined with ultrasound localization using an “outline” Automatic Ultrasound Positioning Support (AUPS) (group A), or the “free-line” Visio-Track (VT) (EDAP-TMS) hand-held three-dimensional ultrasound stone locking system (group B). Efficacy rate was defined as the within-groups proportion stone free or with partial stone fragmentation not needing additional procedures. Statistical analysis used Pearson chi-square tests for categoric variables, nonparametric Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables, and linear regression for operator learning curve with VT. Continuous variables were reported as median (range) values.
Results:
Patients in group A (n=73) and group B (n=81) were comparable in baseline characteristics (age, kidney stone size, others) and in SWL application (duration, number of shocks, energy [Joules]). During SWL, the median (range) duration (seconds) of radiation exposure was 159.5 (0–690) in group A and 3.5 (0–478) in group B (P<0.001) and irradiation dose (mGy.cm2), 10598 (0–54843) in group A and 163 (0–13926) in group B (P<0.001). Fluoroscopy time significantly decreased with operator experience using VT. The efficacy rate was 54.5% in group A and 79.5% in group B (P=0.001).
Conclusion:
VT significantly reduced fluoroscopy use during SWL and the duration and dose of patient exposure to ionizing radiation. Stone treatment efficacy was significantly greater with VT mainly because of a better real-time monitoring of the stone.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
