Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Versus Open: Comparison of the Learning Curve of a Single Surgeon

Abstract

Background and Purpose:

Because of the increased use of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for the management of localized prostate cancer, surgeons in training face the issues of developing skills in both open surgery and the robotic console. This study compares prospectively the safety and efficacy of the first 50 open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) procedures and the first 50 RALP procedures, performed by the same surgeon in the same institution.

Patients and Methods:

The patients' baseline demographic, clinical, and oncologic parameters were prospectively recorded. The study end points included oncologic outcome, functional outcomes (at 3 months), and perioperative parameters. Complications were classified according to the modified Clavien system.

Results:

No statistically significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of preoperative patient characteristics and oncologic parameters. The operative time and mean estimated blood loss were lower in the RALP group (P<0.001), but no statistically significant difference was noted in regard to transfusion rates (P=0.362). Mean hospital stay was lower in the RALP group (P<0.001). The minor (Clavien I+II) and major (Clavien III+IV) complication rates were comparable between the two groups. The overall positive margin (PSM) rates were 20% and 18% for RRP and RALP, respectively (P=0.799), while for pT₃ disease, the PSM rates were 26.1% and 22.2%% for RRP and RALP, respectively (P=0.53). The 3-month continence rates were 88% and 90% for RRP and RALP, respectively (P=0.749). For preoperatively potent patients, 3-month potency rates were comparable between the two groups (60.6% and 62.1% in the RRP and the RALP group, respectively, P=0.893).

Conclusion:

The early learning curve for RALP appears safe and results in equivalent functional and oncologic outcome, when compared with the results of open surgery.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ficarra

, Novara

, Artibani

et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol, 2009; 55:1037–1036.

Menon

, Shrivastava

, Kaul

et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: Contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol, 2007; 51:648–658.

Walsh

. Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: A structured debate. J Urol, 2000; 163:1802–1807.

Walsh

, Lepor

, Eggleston

. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: Anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate, 1983; 4:473–485.

Patel

, Palmer

, Coughlin

, Samavedi

. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol, 2008; 22:2299–2305.

Rocco

, Carmignani

, Acquati

et al. Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur Urol, 2007; 52:376–383.

Blasko

, Grimm

, Sylsvester

, Cavanagh

. The role of external beam radiotherapy with I-125/Pd-103 brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma. Radiother Oncol, 2000; 57:273–278.

Dindo

, Demartines

, Clavien

. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg, 2004; 240:205–213.

Boccon-Gibod

, Djavan

, Hammerer

et al. Management of prostate-specific antigen relapse in prostate cancer: A European Consensus. Int J Clin Pract, 2004; 58:382–390.

10.

Binder

, Kramer

. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int, 2001; 87:408–410.

11.

Eichel

, Ahlering

, Clayman

. Role of robotics in laparoscopic urologic surgery. Urol Clin North Am, 2004; 31:781–792.

12.

Menon

, Shrivastava

, Tewari

et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: Establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol, 2002; 168:945–949.

13.

Atug

, Castle

, Srivastav

et al. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol, 2006; 49:866–872.

14.

Zorn

, Orvieto

, Gong

et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy learning curve of a fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeon. J Endourol, 2007; 21:441–447.

15.

Williams

, Prasad

, Weinberg

et al. Trends in the care of radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2006. BJU Int, 2011; 108:49–55.

16.

Carlsson

, Nilsson

, Schumacher

et al. Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Urology, 2010; 75:1092–1097.

17.

Rocco

, Matei

, Melegari

et al. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: A matched-pair analysis. BJU Int, 2009; 104:991–995.

18.

, Gu

, Lipsitz

et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA, 2009; 302:1557–1564.

19.

Tewari

, Srivasatava

, Menon

. members of the VIP team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: Experience in one institution. BJU Int, 2003; 92:205–210.

20.

Barocas

, Salem

, Kordan

et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: Comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. J Urol, 2010; 183:990–996.

21.

Di Pierro

, Baumeister

, Stucki

et al. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol, 2011; 59:1–6.

22.

Ahlering

, Woo

, Eichel

et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: A comparison of one surgeon's outcomes. Urology, 2004; 63:819–822.

23.

Doumerc

, Yuen

, Savdie

et al. Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years. BJU Int, 2010; 106:378–384.

24.

, Yang

, Wang

et al. The learning curve for reducing complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon. BJU Int, 2011; 108:420–425.

25.

Farnham

, Webster

, Herrell

, Smith

Jr.

Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology, 2006; 67:360–363.

26.

Webb

, Sethi

, Gee

. An analysis of the causes of bladder neck contracture after open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int, 2009; 103:957–963.

27.

Krambeck

, DiMarco

, Rangel

et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: A matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int, 2009; 103:448–453.

28.

White

, De Haan

, Stephens

et al.

Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: Are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program?

Urology, 2009; 73:567–571.

29.

Smith JA

, Chan

, Chang

et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol, 2007; 178:2385–2390.

30.

Vickers

, Bianco

, Cronin

et al. The learning curve for surgical margins after open radical prostatectomy: Implications for margin status as an oncological end point. J Urol, 2010; 183:1360–1365.

31.

Patel

, Coelho

, Rocco

et al. Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional study. J Urol, 2011; 186:511–516.

32.

Yossepowitch

, Bjartell

, Eastham

et al. Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: Outlining the problem and its long-term consequences. Eur Urol, 2009; 55:87–99.

33.

Leroy

, Thiel

, Duchene

et al. Safety and peri-operative outcomes during learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A multi-institutional study of fellowship-trained robotic surgeons versus experienced open radical prostatectomy surgeons incorporating robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Endourol, 2010; 24:1665–1669.