Outcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Compared with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Elderly Patients with Moderate-Size Kidney Stones: A Matched-Pair Analysis

Abstract

Purpose:

The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in elderly patients with stones of moderate size.

Patients and Methods:

Between September 2008 and June 2011, a total of 28 patients over 65 years of age with single renal stones that measured 1.5 to 3 cm were treated with RIRS. The outcomes of these patients were compared with those of the patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using matched-pair analysis (1:1 scenario). The matching parameters were the size and location of the stone as well as age, sex, body mass index, degree of hydronephrosis, presence of previous shockwave lithotripsy, and open surgery. SPSS version 16 was used for statistical analysis.

Results:

Stone-free rates after a single procedure were achieved in 82.1% of patients for the RIRS and 92.8% of patients for the PCNL group. The second flexible ureterorenoscopy procedure was performed for five patients in the RIRS group. Finally, stone-free rates during the third month of the follow-up period were 92.8% in the RIRS group and 96.4% in the PCNL group. The mean operative time per patient was 64.5±20.9 minutes in the RIRS group after a total of 33 procedures, while it was 40.7±10.7 minutes in the PCNL groups (P<0.0001). The overall complication rates for the RIRS and PCNL groups were 7.1% and 10.7%, respectively. Blood transfusions were needed in two patients in the PCNL group. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the RIRS group (26.5±10.6 h per patient vs 60.0±28.8 h; P<0.0001). In both groups, stones were most frequently composed of calcium oxalate (68.4% in the RIRS group and 77.7% in the PCNL group).

Conclusion:

RIRS has a low complication rate and represents a safe and effective treatment alternative in selected geriatric patients with kidney stones of moderate size.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Preminger

, Assimos

, Lingeman

et al. Chapter 1: AUA Guideline on management of staghorn calculi: Diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol, 2005; 173:1991–2000.

Türk

, Knoll

, Petrik

et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. 2010; 1–106. www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/Urolithiasis%202010.pdf. 2012 January 20.

Michel

, Trojan

, Rassweiler

. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol, 2007; 51:899–906.

de la Rosette

, Assimos

, Desai

et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: Indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol, 2011; 25:11–17.

Muslumanoglu

, Tefekli

, Karadag

et al. Impact of percutaenous access point number and location on complication and success rates in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Int, 2006; 77:340–346.

Binbay

, Yuruk

, Akman

et al.

Is there a difference in outcomes between digital and fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscopy procedures?

J Endourol, 2010; 24:1929–1934.

Skolarikos

, de la Rosette

. Prevention and treatment of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol, 2008; 18:229–234.

Dindo

, Demartines

, Clavien

. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg, 2004; 240:205–213.

Paffen

, Keizer

, de Winter

et al. A comparison of the physical properties of four new generation flexible ureteroscopes: (De)flection, flow properties, torsion stiffness, and optical characteristics. J Endourol, 2008; 22:2227–2234.

10.

Yinghao

, Yang

, Gao

. The management of renal caliceal calculi with a newly designed ureteroscope: A rigid ureteroscope with a deflectable tip. J Endourol, 2010; 24:23–26.

11.

Riley

, Stearman

, Troxel

. Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J Endourol, 2009; 23:1395–1398.

12.

Hyams

, Munver

, Bird

et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: A multi-institutional experience. J Endourol, 2010; 24:1583–1588.

13.

Breda

, Ogunyemi

, Leppert

et al.

Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater—is this the new frontier?

J Urol, 2008; 179:98–984.

14.

Tonner

, Kampen

, Scholz

. Pathophysiological changes in the elderly. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2003; 17:163–177.

15.

Chung

, Aron

, Hegarty

, Desai

. Ureteroscopic versus percutaneous treatment for medium-size (1-2-cm) renal calculi. J Endourol, 2008; 22:343–346.

16.

Hyams

, Shah

. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy/holmium laser lithotripsy: Cost and outcome analysis. J Urol, 2009; 182:1012–1017.

17.

Bozkurt

, Resorlu

, Yildiz

et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15 to 20 mm. J Endourol, 2011; 25:1131–1135.

18.

Akman

, Binbay

, Sari

et al. Factors affecting bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Single surgeon experience. J Endourol, 2011; 25:327–333.

19.

Rana

, Zaidi

, El-Khalid

. Single-center review of fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrostomy performed by urologic surgeons. J Endourol, 2007; 21:688–691.

20.

Breda

, Ogunyemi

, Leppert

, Schulam

. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. Eur Urol, 2009; 55:1190–1196.

21.

Mariani

. Combined electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (greater than 4 cm) renal calculi. J Urol, 2007; 177:168–173.

22.

Labate

, Modi

, Timoney

et al. The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: Classification of complications. J Endourol, 2011; 25:1275–1280.

23.

Akman

, Binbay

, Yuruk

et al. Tubeless procedure is most important factor in reducing length of hospitalization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Results of univariable and multivariable models. Urology, 2011; 77:299–304.