Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction:

Thermal ablative therapy with cryotherapy and radiofrequency ablation is currently being utilized for treatment of small renal masses. Recently, microwave ablation (MWA) has been investigated for soft tissue destruction, with limited clinical experience for renal masses. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a new microwave system in the porcine kidney.

Materials and Methods:

MWAs were performed in vivo on six pigs using the Evident Microwave Ablation System (Valleylab, Boulder, CO) with a 3.7 cm active tip percutaneous antenna. Ablations were performed in both upper and lower poles at 45 W for 3, 5, and 10 minutes. Three pigs died; three pigs survived for 7 days. After necropsy the kidneys were harvested, ablation zones were measured, and histological analysis was performed.

Results:

The ablated zones at each time interval were inconsistent. The gross appearance of the lesions in both groups was similar. The antenna tract was charred, the collecting system was damaged, and there was asymmetry of the zones of ablation. Histological analysis revealed coagulative necrosis in the area of the ablation with sloughed and denuded urothelium.

Conclusion:

MWA of the kidney utilizing this model yields inconsistent geometrical lesions when applied near the renal collecting system. Additionally, microwave energy may be preferentially absorbed by the increased water content in the collecting system resulting in damage to it. Further study is needed to assess the attenuation of the microwave field in the kidney at different locations due to the kidneys heterogeneity.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Jemal

, Siegel

, Ward

et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin, 2008; 58:71–96.

Luciani

, Cestari

, Tallarigo

. Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: Study of 1092 patients (1982–1997) Urology, 2000; 56:58–62.

Jayson

, Sanders

. Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology, 1998; 51:203–205.

Lerner

, Hawkins

, Blute

et al. Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery, 1996. J Urol, 2002; 167,2 Pt 2:884–889; discussion 889–890.

Lau

, Blute

, Weaver

et al. Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin Proc, 2000; 75:1236–1242.

Gill

, Kavoussi

, Lane

et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol, 2007; 178:41–46.

Lane

, Gill

. 5-Year outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol, 2007; 177:70–74discussion 74.

Matin

, Ahrar

. Nephron-sparing probe ablative therapy: long-term outcomes. Curr Opin Urol, 2008; 18:150–156.

Carey

, Leveillee

. First prize: direct real-time temperature monitoring for laparoscopic and CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors between 3 and 5 cm. J Endourol, 2007; 21:807–813.

10.

Bird

, Carey

, Ayyathurai

et al. Management of renal masses with laparoscopic-guided radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol, 2009; 23:81–88.

11.

Wingo

, Leveillee

. Central and deep renal tumors can be effectively ablated: radiofrequency ablation outcomes with fiberoptic peripheral temperature monitoring. J Endourol, 2008; 22:1261–1267.

12.

Carrafiello

, Lagana

, Mangini

et al. Microwave tumors ablation: Principles, clinical applications and review of preliminary experiences. Int J Surg, 2008; 6 Suppl 1:565–569.

13.

Brace

. Radiofrequency and microwave ablation of the liver, lung, kidney, and bone: What are the differences? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol, 2009; 38:135–143.

14.

Simon

, Dupuy

, Mayo-Smith

. Microwave ablation: Principles and applications. Radiographics, 2005; 25 Suppl 1:S69–S83.

15.

Wright

, Lee

Jr. , Mahvi

. Hepatic microwave ablation with multiple antennae results in synergistically larger zones of coagulation necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol, 2003; 10:275–283.

16.

Liang

, Wang

. Microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology, 2007; 72,Suppl 1:124–131.

17.

Clark

, Woodruff

, Zagoria

et al. Microwave ablation of renal parenchymal tumors before nephrectomy: Phase I study. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007; 188:1212–1214.

18.

Rehman

, Landman

, Lee

et al. Needle-based ablation of renal parenchyma using microwave, cryoablation, impedance- and temperature-based monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency, and liquid and gel chemoablation: laboratory studies and review of the literature. J Endourol, 2004; 18:83–104.

19.

Hope

, Schmelzer

, Newcomb

et al. Guidelines for power and time variables for microwave ablation in an in vivo porcine kidney. J Surg Res, 2008; 153,2:263–267.

20.

Niemz

. Light and Matter, Laser-Tissue Interactions: Fundamentals and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1996; 9–43.

21.

Liang

, Wang

, Zhang

et al. Ultrasound guided percutaneous microwave ablation for small renal cancer: Initial experience. J Urol, 2008; 180:844–848.

22.

Valleylab MWA Percutaneous Antenna (Package Insert) Valleylab: Boulder, CO.

23.

Janzen

, Perry

, Han

et al. The effects of intentional cryoablation and radio frequency ablation of renal tissue involving the collecting system in a porcine model. J Urol, 2005; 173:1368–1374.