Not So “Simple” Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: Outcomes and Complications of a 7-Year Experience

Abstract

Introduction:

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has quickly evolved as an oncologic standard of care. The “Simple” nephrectomy implies an easier procedure than perhaps its radical counterpart and one that budding laparoscopists may approach with more confidence. Though, strict indications for simple nephrectomy are few, these cases tend to have infectious or inflammatory pathology sometimes making the procedure more difficult than its radical counterpart.

Methods:

A retrospective review of our experience with laparoscopic simple nephrectomy (LSN) over a 7-year period was performed. A total of 42 patients (12 males/ 30 females) with a mean age 47.5 years underwent LSN: 25 retroperitoneal (RP), 17 transperitoneal (TP). Indications for nephrectomy included poorly functioning kidneys associated with pain ± hydronephrosis, recurrent infections, renal arterial stenosis induced malignant hypertension, XGP with stones.

Results:

Forty-two of 45 attempted simple nephrectomies were completed laparoscopically. Three patients had open conversions: two for non-progression and one endovascular stapler malfunction. Three patients were converted from RP to TP due to severe scarring (two having prior nephrostomy tubes). Median operative time was 202.5 minutes (98–399). Eight patients were discharged within 23 hours with no complications, all having RP approaches and morcellated specimens. Mean post-operative oral intake was 17.8 hours and bowel function return was 1.3 days. Median estimated blood loss 100 ml (30–4500). Creatinine levels did not alter significantly. Median specimen weight was 88.9 grams (28–672). Fourteen complications occurred in nine patients (21.4%): five minor (flank ecchymosis and mild ileus) and nine major (re-intubation, flank hernia, wound opening requiring readmission, retroperitoneal infections, trocar fistula formation, bleed requiring transfusion). Four patients were transfused: one for post-op bleed from the ureteral stump, two for chronic anemia with minimal intraoperative blood loss, and one for intraoperative blood loss.

Conclusions:

Laparoscopic simple nephrectomy has few indications and includes a complicated patient population. The results show its efficacy and overall safety despite a moderate complication rate. Utilizing a retroperitoneal approach with specimen morcellation can reduce hospital stay. One should approach a laparoscopic nephrectomy for non-malignancy with caution for infectious or inflammatory indications.