Faith in American elections is eroding, with politicians frequently questioning the legitimacy of election results and spreading misinformation about voter fraud. Substantial work has been done to refute misinformation and increase confidence in elections, but often without a clear picture of who skeptics are and why they are skeptical. Using a nationally representative survey from around the 2022 midterm election (N = 5,244) and beyond (N = 77,325), we provide a comprehensive profile of election skeptics: their prevalence, views, and justifications. Our use of quantitative and qualitative data reveals a more milquetoast portrait of skeptics. Skeptics are demographically closer to the broader electorate than not, and the self-reported underpinnings of skepticism are more mundane than conspiratorial. Over half of skeptics claim they are skeptical because of how elections are run and nearly one-in-five skeptics claim they are skeptical because of the other party’s performance in recent elections, which we corroborate through an event study of the 2022 election.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhlquistJohn S., MayerKenneth R., and JackmanSimon. 2014. “Alien abduction and voter impersonation in the 2012 U.S. general election: Evidence from a survey list experiment.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 13(4):460–475; doi: 10.1089/elj.2013.0231
2.
AlbertsonBethany and GuilerKimberly. 2020. “Conspiracy theories, election rigging, and support for democratic norms.” Research & Politics, 7(3):205316802095985; doi: 10.1177/2053168020959859
3.
AllenHoward W and AllenKay W. 1981. Vote fraud and data validity. In Analyzing electoral history: a guide to the study of American voter behavior. In: Number 33 in “Sage Focus Editions”. Ed. by ClubbJerome M, FlaniganWilliam H and ZingaleNancy H. Sage Publicans: Beverly Hills, CA; pp. 153–191.
4.
AlvarezR. Michael, LevinInes, and LiYimeng. 2018. “Fraud, convenience, and e-voting: How voting experience shapes opinions about voting technology.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 15(2):94–105; doi: 10.1080/19331681.2018.1460288
5.
AlvarezR. Michael, CaoJian, and LiYimeng. 2021. “Voting experiences, perceptions of fraud, and voter confidence.” Social Science Quarterly, 102(4):1225–1238; doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12940
6.
AlvarezR. Michael, HallThad E., and LlewellynMorgan H.. 2008. “Are Americans confident their ballots are counted?” The Journal of Politics, 70(3):754–766; doi: 10.1017/S0022381608080730
7.
AlvarezR. Michael, HallThad E and HydeSusan D.., eds. 2008. Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation. Brookings Institution Press: Washington, DC. OCLC: ocn185691136.
8.
ArthurDamon. 2023. “With more costs to come, Shasta County will spend $950,000 on new voting system.”.
9.
BaptistaJoão Pedro and GradimAnabela. 2022. “Who believes in fake news? Identification of Political (A)Symmetries.” Social Sciences, 11(10):460.
10.
BeberBernd and ScaccoAlexandra. 2012. “What the numbers say: A digit-based test for election fraud.” Political Analysis, 20(2):211–234.
11.
BerlinskiNicolas, DoyleMargaret, GuessAndrew M., LevyGabrielle, LyonsBenjamin, MontgomeryJacob M., NyhanBrendan, and ReiflerJason. 2023. “The effects of unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud on confidence in elections.” Journal of Experimental Political Science, 10(1):34–49.
12.
BolgerNiall, ZeeKatherine S., Rossignac-MilonMaya, and HassinRan R.. 2019. “Causal processes in psychology are heterogeneous.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 148(4):601–618.
13.
BolsenToby, DruckmanJames N., and CookFay Lomax. 2014. “The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion.” Political Behavior, 36(2):235–262; doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0
14.
Botvinik-NezerRotem, JonesMatt, and WagerTor D.. 2023. “A belief systems analysis of fraud beliefs following the 2020 US election.” Nature Human Behaviour, 7(7):1106–1119.
15.
BowlerShaun, BrunellThomas, DonovanTodd, and GronkePaul. 2015. “Election administration and perceptions of fair elections.” Electoral Studies, 38:1–9.
BullockJohn G., GerberAlan S., HillSeth J., and HuberGregory A.. 2015. “Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4):519–578.
CalvilloDustin P., RutchickAbraham M., and GarciaRyan J. B.. 2021. “Individual differences in belief in fake news about election fraud after the 2020 u.S. Election.” Behavioral Sciences, 11(12):175. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/11/12/175
21.
CampbellJames E. 1991. “The presidential surge and its midterm decline in congressional elections, 1868–1988.” The Journal of Politics 53, 53(2):477–487; doi: 10.1017/S0022381600048404
22.
CappellaJoseph N and JamiesonKathleen Hall. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. Oxford University Press on Demand.
23.
CarsonJamie L and HitefieldAaron A.. 2023. “A red wave or a ripple? Nationalized politics and the 2022 midterm elections.” The Forum, 21(1):3–25; doi: 10.1515/for-2023-2002/html?lang=en
ChristensenRay and SchultzThomas J.. 2014. “Identifying election fraud using orphan and low propensity voters.” American Politics Research, 42(2):311–337; doi: 10.1177/1532673X13498411
26.
ClaytonKatherine, DavisNicholas T., NyhanBrendan, PorterEthan, RyanTimothy J., and WoodThomas J.. 2021. “Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 118(23):e2024125118; doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024125118
27.
ClaytonKatherine and WillerRobb. 2023. “Endorsements from Republican politicians can increase confidence in US elections.” Research & Politics, 10(1):205316802211489.
28.
ClintonJoshua D., LapinskiJohn, LentzSarah, and PettigrewStephen. 2022. “Trumped by Trump? Public support for mail voting in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 21(1):19–33.
29.
CookThomas D., CampbellDonald Thomas, and DayArles. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton Mifflin Boston; Vol. 351.
30.
CottrellDavid, HerronMichael C., and WestwoodSean J.. 2018. “An exploration of Donald Trump’s allegations of massive voter fraud in the 2016 General Election.” Electoral Studies, 51:123–142.
31.
DudaJeremy. 2022. “Lake refuses to concede, indicates possible legal challenge.”.
32.
EdelsonJack, AlduncinAlexander, KrewsonChristopher, SiejaJames A., and UscinskiJoseph E.. 2017. “The effect of conspiratorial thinking and motivated reasoning on belief in election fraud.” Political Research Quarterly, 70(4):933–946; doi: 10.1177/1065912917721061
33.
EggersAndrew C., GarroHaritz, and GrimmerJustin. 2021. “No evidence for systematic voter fraud: A guide to statistical claims about the 2020 election.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(45):e2103619118.
34.
EndersAdam M., DiekmanAmanda, KlofstadCasey, MurthiManohar, VerdearDaniel, WuchtyStefan, and UscinskiJoseph. 2023a. “On modeling the correlates of conspiracy thinking.” Scientific Reports, 13(1):8325.
35.
EndersAdam M., UscinskiJoseph E., SeeligMichelle I., KlofstadCasey A., WuchtyStefan, FunchionJohn R., MurthiManohar N., PremaratneKamal, and StolerJustin. 2023b. “The relationship between social media use and beliefs in conspiracy theories and misinformation.” Political Behavior, 45(2):781–804; doi: 10.1007/s11109-021-09734-6
36.
EndersAdam M and SmallpageSteven M.. 2019. “Informational cues, partisan-motivated reasoning, and the manipulation of conspiracy beliefs.” Political Communication, 36(1):83–102; doi: 10.1080/10584609.2018.1493006
FreederSean and ShinoEnrijeta. 2024. “Access or experience? Determinants of distrust in US elections.” American Politics Research, 52(2):97–111; doi: 10.1177/1532673X231220921
42.
GainesBrian J and KuklinskiJames H.. 2011. “Experimental estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects related to self-selection.” American Journal of Political Science, 55(3):724–736; doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00518.x
GerberAlan S., GreenDonald P., and ShacharRon. 2003. “Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment.” American Journal of Political Science, 47(3):540–550; doi: 10.1111/1540-5907.00038
GrahamMatthew H and YairOmer. 2023. “Expressive responding and belief in 2020 election fraud.” Political Behavior, 46(2):1349–1374; doi: 10.1007/s11109-023-09875-w
48.
GuessAndrew M., LernerMichael, LyonsBenjamin, MontgomeryJacob M., NyhanBrendan, ReiflerJason, and SircarNeelanjan. 2020. “A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 117(27):15536–15545; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920498117
49.
HalliezAdrien A and ThorntonJudd R.. 2023. “The winner-loser satisfaction gap in the absence of a clear outcome.” Party Politics, 29(2):260–269.
50.
HenigJess. 2008. “ACORN Accusations.”.
51.
HitchensChristopher. 2006. “Ohio’s Odd Numbers.”.
52.
HofstadterRichard. 2012. The Paranoid Style in American Politics. Vintage.
53.
HoodM. V.III, and GillespieWilliam. 2012. “They just do not vote like they used to: A methodology to empirically assess election fraud*.” Social Science Quarterly, 93(1):76–94; doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00837.x
54.
JamiesonKathleen Hall. 2020. Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President: What We Don’t, Can’t, and Do Know. Oxford University Press.
55.
KernHolger L., StuartElizabeth A., HillJennifer, and GreenDonald P.. 2016. “assessing methods for generalizing experimental impact estimates to target populations.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(1):103–127; doi: 10.1080/19345747.2015.1060282
56.
KriegGregory. 2020. “Stacey Abrams says ‘democracy failed’ Georgia as she ends bid for governor.”.
57.
KuoDidi and TeorellJan. 2017. “Illicit tactics as substitutes: Election fraud, ballot reform, and contested congressional elections in the United States, 1860–1930.” Comparative Political Studies, 50(5):665–696; doi: 10.1177/0010414016649481
McAllisterIan and WhiteStephen. 2015. “Electoral integrity and support for democracy in Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 25(1):78–96.
65.
McCarthyDevin. 2023. “Do partisans follow their leaders on election manipulation?” Political Communication, 40(2):173–200.
MongrainPhilippe. 2023. “Suspicious minds: Unexpected election outcomes, perceived electoral integrity and satisfaction with democracy in american presidential elections.” Political Research Quarterly, 76(4):1589–1603; doi: 10.1177/10659129231166679
68.
NyhanBrendan, PorterEthan, ReiflerJason, and WoodThomas J.. 2020. “Taking fact-checks literally but not seriously? The effects of journalistic fact-checking on factual beliefs and candidate favorability.” Political Behavior, 42(3):939–960.
69.
PennycookGordon and RandDavid G.. 2022. “Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation.” Nature Communications, 13(1):2333.
70.
PetersonErik and IyengarShanto. 2021. “Partisan gaps in political information and information-seeking behavior: Motivated reasoning or cheerleading?” American Journal of Political Science, 65(1):133–147.
PiazzaJames A. 2022. “Sore losers: Does terrorism and approval of terrorism increase in democracies when election losers refuse to accept election results?” Political Research Quarterly, 75(4):1201–1215.
RellerCassidy, AndersonAnthony, and KousserThad. 2022. “Are elite cues necessary to drive the “Winner Effect” on trust in elections?” Electoral Studies, 80:102541.
77.
ReynoldsJohn F. 1993. “A symbiotic relationship: Vote fraud and electoral reform in the gilded age.” Social Science History, 17(2):227–251.
78.
RoseRichard and MishlerWilliam. 2009. “How do electors respond to an” Unfair” Election? The experience of Russians.” Post-Soviet Affairs, 25(2):118–136.
79.
SancesMichael W and StewartCharlesIII. 2015. “Partisanship and confidence in the vote count: Evidence from US national elections since 2000.” Electoral Studies, 40:176–188.
SinclairBetsy, SmithSteven S., and TuckerPatrick D.. 2018. “It’s largely a rigged system”: voter confidence and the winner effect in 2016.” Political Research Quarterly, 71(4):854–868.
83.
SinghShane P and ThorntonJudd R.. 2019. “Elections activate partisanship across countries.” American Political Science Review, 113(1):248–253.
84.
SummersMark Wahlgren. 2001. “Party games: The art of stealing elections in the late-nineteenth-century United States.” The Journal of American History 88, 88(2):424–435. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2675098
WestwoodSean J., GrimmerJustin, TylerMatthew, and NallClayton. 2022. “Current research overstates American support for political violence.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(12):e2116870119.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
