Nomination contests are the processes by which candidates are selected to stand in a general election under a political party’s banner. In Canada, the rules governing these processes differ widely by party, and thus, the structure of individual nomination contests differs significantly between parties and ridings. In this article, we explore the implications of these institutional differences for fundraising outcomes. Drawing on theories of party gatekeeping (Albaugh, 2022), we use data from Elections Canada from 2004 to 2019 to explore how the structure of nomination contests influences the amount of money that contestants raise at the nomination stage. We find that the presence of multiple contestants, running in a party stronghold district, and longer nomination process all predict higher amounts fundraised by contestants. Our findings contribute to debates about candidate emergence by probing the role of money early in the election process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramowitzAlan I. 1988. “Explaining senate election outcomes.” American Political Science Review, 82(2):385–403; doi: 10.2307/1957392
2.
AlbaughQuinn M. 2022. “Gatekeeping by central and local party actors: Theory and evidence from a field study of new Brunswick nominations, 2017–2018.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 55(3):561–582; doi: 10.1017/S0008423922000385
3.
BlaisAndré, GidengilElisabeth, DobrzynskaAgnieszka, NevitteNeil, and AdeauRichard. 2003. “Does the local candidate matter? Candidate effects in the Canadian election of 2000.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 36(3):657–664; doi: 10.1017/S0008423903778810
4.
CartyRoland Kenneth. 2002. “The politics of Tecumseh corners: Canadian political parties as Franchise organizations.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 35(4):723–745; doi: 10.1017/S0008423902778402
5.
ChengChristine and TavitsMargit. 2011. “Informal influences in selecting female political candidates.” Political Research Quarterly, 64(2), 460–471; doi: 10.1177/1065912909349631
6.
CrandallErin, and RoyMichael. 2020. “Party Fundraisers. ” In: Inside the Campiagn: Managing Local Elections in Canada. Edited by MarlandAlex and GiassonThierry. Vancouver: UBC Press.
7.
CrespinMichael H and DeitzJanna L.. 2010. “If you can’t join ‘Em, beat ‘Em: The gender gap in individual donations to congressional candidates.” Political Research Quarterly, 63(3):581–593; doi: 10.1177/1065912909333131
8.
CrossWilliam. 2016. “The importance of local party activity in understanding Canadian politics: Winning from the ground up in the 2015 federal election: Presidential address to the Canadian Political Science Association Calgary, 31 May 2016.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 49(4):601–620; doi: 10.1017/S0008423916000962
9.
CrossWilliam P and PruysersScott. 2019. “The local determinants of representation: Party constituency associations, candidate nomination and gender.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 52(3):557–574; doi: 10.1017/S0008423919000064
10.
CrossWilliam and YoungLisa. 2003. “Women’s participation in Canadian political parties.” In: Women and Electoral Politics in Canada. Ed. byTremblayManon and TrimbleLinda. Oxford University Press92–109).
11.
CrossWilliam and YoungLisa. 2011. “Candidate recruitment in Canada: The role of political parties.” In: Parties, Elections, and the Future of Canadian Politics. Ed. byBittnerAmanda and KoopRoyce. UBC Press24–45).
12.
Crowder-MeyerMelody. 2013. “Gendered recruitment without trying: How local party recruiters affect women’s representation.” Politics & Gender, 9(04):390–413; doi: 10.1017/S1743923X13000391
13.
EaglesMunroe. 2004. “The effectiveness of local campaign spending in the 1993 and 1997 federal elections in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 37(1):117–136; doi: 10.1017/S0008423904040065
EricksonLynda. 1991. “Women and candidacies for the House of Commons.” In: Women in Canadian Politics: Toward Equity in Representation. Ed. by MegyeryKathy. Dundurn Press Limited; Toronto101–127.
16.
EsselmentAnna Lennox, and BondyMatthew. (2022). “Local Nominations. ” In: Inside the Local Campaign: Constituency Elections in Canada. Edited by MarlandAlex and GiassonThierry. Vancouver: UBC Press.
17.
ForrestJames. 1991. “Campaign spending in the New South Wales legislative assembly elections of 1984.” Australian Journal of Political Science, 26(3):526–534; doi: 10.1080/00323269108402165
18.
GarnettHolly Ann., PruysersScott, YoungLisa, and CrossWilliam P.. 2022. “Lifeblood of the party: Motivations for political donations in Canada.” The American Review of Canadian Studies, 52(4):422–445; doi: 10.1080/02722011.2022.2147756
19.
GarnettHolly Ann. 2024. “Where do donors come from? Using census data to predict donations to Canadian federal election candidates.” Political Geography, 110, 103077; doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103077
20.
GreenDonald Philip and KrasnoJonathan S.. 1988. “Salvation for the spendthrift incumbent: Reestimating the effects of campaign spending in house elections.” American Journal of Political Science, 32(4):884–907; doi: 10.2307/2111193
21.
HerrickRebekah and Morehouse-MendezJeanette. 2014. “Women and Campaigns.” In: Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future. Ed. by ThomasSue and WilcoxClyde. Oxford University Press97–110.
22.
HerrnsonPaul S., HuntCharles, and KettlerJaclyn J.. 2022. “Vive la différence? Is there a gender gap in campaign strategy and spending, and does it matter?” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 43(4):463–482.
23.
JacobsonGary C. 1980. Money in Congressional Elections. Yale University Press; New Haven.
24.
MarlandAlex. 2016. Brand Command: Canadian Politics and Democracy in the Age of Message Control. UBC Press.
25.
McGillivrayBarbara and De RanieriElisa. 2018. “Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in nature journals by review model and author characteristics.” Research Integrity and Peer Review, 3(1):5; doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z
26.
McMahonNicole, SayersAnthony, and AlcantaraChristopher. 2023. “Political donations and the gender gap during COVID-19.” Party Politics, 29(1):176–184; doi: 10.1177/13540688211047768
PruysersScott and CrossWilliam. 2016. “Candidate selection in Canada: Local autonomy, centralization, and competing democratic norms.” American Behavioral Scientist, 60(7):781–798; doi: 10.1177/0002764216632820
29.
PruysersScott and BlaisJulie. 2019. “Narcissistic women and cash-strapped men: who can be encouraged to consider running for political office, and who should do the encouraging?”. Political Research Quarterly, 72(1), 229–242; doi: 10.1177/1065912918786040
30.
RahatGideon and HazanReuven Y.. 2001. “Candidate selection methods: An analytical framework.” Party Politics, 7(3):297–322; doi: 10.1177/1354068801007003003
31.
Samara Centre for Democracy. 2019. Party favours: How federal election candidates are chosen.
32.
ScarrowSusan E. 2007. “Political finance in comparative perspective.” Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1):193–210; doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.080505.100115
33.
SeviSemra, Arel-BundockVincent, and BlaisAndré. 2019. “Do women get fewer votes? No.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 52(1):201–210; doi: 10.1017/S0008423918000495
34.
ThomasMelanee. 2013. “Barriers to women’s political participation in Canada.” University of New Brunswick Law Journal, 63:218–233.
TolleyErin. 2019. “Who you know: Local party presidents and minority candidate emergence.” Electoral Studies, 58:70–79; doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.02.007
37.
TolleyErin, BescoRandy, and SeviSemra. 2022. “Who controls the purse strings? A longitudinal study of gender and donations in Canadian politics.” Politics & Gender, 18(1):244–272; doi: 10.1017/S1743923X20000276
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
