Local election administrators stand at a key intersection in the United States’ election system managing registration, ballot access, early and Election Day voting, and reporting election outcomes. The elections policy landscape within which these administrators and their offices operate has rapidly changed over the past quarter century, yet because of the complex and decentralized nature of elections, there has been not much progress made in applying theories of policy stability and change to election administration. This research begins to rectify this using “policyscape” and “policy drift” as two lenses to conceptualize stability and change in election administration. The research shows that policy drift helps to explain a disconnect between the current service expectations from these offices and existing models of staffing and workforce development, shown from an inductive analysis of in-depth interviews conducted with election officials in the State of Oregon. Finally, we argue that research on local election administration needs more theory building and would benefit from the use of qualitative research to understand the nuances and details of election administration and the needs of administrators.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdonaNatalie, GronkePaul, MansonPaul, and ColeSarah. 2019. Stewards of Democracy: The Views of American Local Election Officials. Democracy Fund: Washington, D.C. Available from: https://www.democracyfund.org/publications/stewards-of-democracy/ [Last accessed: August16, 2019].
2.
AlvarezR. M. and HallT. E. (2006). Controlling Democracy: The Principal-Agent Problems in Election Administration. Policy Studies Journal, 34(4):491–510.
3.
BaumgartnerFrank R and JonesBryan D. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
4.
BurdenBarry C., CanonDavid T., LavertuStéphane, MayerKenneth R., and MoynihanDonald P.. 2013. “Selection method, partisanship, and the administration of elections.” American Politics Research, 41(6):903–936.
5.
BurdenBarry C., CanonDavid T., MayerKenneth R., and MoynihanDonald P.. 2011. “early voting and election day registration in the trenches: Local officials’ perceptions of election reform.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 10(2):89–102.
6.
BurdenBarry C., CanonDavid T., MayerKenneth R., and MoynihanDonald P.. 2012. “The effect of administrative burden on bureaucratic perception of policies: Evidence from election administration.” Public Administration Review, 72(5):741–751.
7.
CharlesGuy-Uriel E. and Fuentes-RohwerLuis. 2014. “The voting rights act in winter: The death of a superstatue.” Iowa Law Review, 100:1389.
8.
ClarkAmanda D., BarskyChristina S., and BustinzaMonica A.. 2023. “heavy lifting: Emotional labor and election administration.” Administration & Society, 55(2):308–325.
9.
CreekH. M and KarnesK. A.. 2010. “Federalism and election law: Implementation issues in Rural America.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 40(2):275–295.
10.
EskridgeWilliam N. and FerejohnJohn. 2001. “Super-Statutes.” Duke Law Journal, 50(5):1215–1276.
11.
FischerEric A and ColemanKevin J. 2011. “How Local Election Officials View Election Reform: The Results From Three National Surveys”. Congressional Research Service: Washington DC.
12.
GalvinDaniel J and HackerJacob S.. 2020. “The political effects of policy drift: Policy Stalemate and American Political Development”. Studies in American Political Development, 34(2):216–238.
13.
Gronke, KimballPaul. David, MerivakiLia, Suttman-LeaMara, KingBridgett, and GroseChristian. (eds). 2024. The Frontline of Democracy: How Local Election Administrators Support, Staff, and Defend American Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan: Singapore.
14.
GronkePaul and KimballDavid, et al.2024. “Understanding election administrators at the frontline of American of Democracy.” In PGronke (eds), The Frontline of American Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
GronkePaul and MansonPaul. 2023. “Today’s Election Administration Landscape: Findings from the Reed College/Elections and Voting Information Center 2023 Survey of Local Election Officials.”. Reed College: Portland, OR. Available from: https://evic.reed.edu/2023_leo_survey_report/
HackerJacob S., PiersonPaul, and ThelenKathleen. 2015. “Drift and conversion: Hidden faces of institutional change.” Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, 180–208.
18.
HaleK. and SlatonC. D. (2008). Building Capacity in Election Administration: Local Responses to Complexity and Interdependence. Public Administration Review, 68(5):839–849.
19.
HaleKathleen and BrownMitchell. 2020. How We Vote: Innovation in American Elections. Georgetown University Press.
20.
HaleKathleen, MontjoyRobert, and BrownMitchell. 2015. Administering Elections: How American Elections Work. Palgrave MacMillan: New York.
21.
KimballDavid C and KropfMartha. 2006. “The Street-Level Bureaucrats of Elections: Selection Methods for Local Election Officials.” Review of Policy Research, 23(6):1257–1268.
22.
KimballDavid C., KropfMartha, MoynihanDonald, and SilvaCarol L.. 2013. “Policy views of partisan election officials.” The.” UC Irvine Law Review, 3:551.
23.
KimballDavid, Collins-FoleyJennifer, SchmidtConnie, and MaxwellChere’. 2010. “Survey of Poll Worker recruitment, training, and evaluation practices by local election officials.” Available from: http://www.umsl.edu/∼kimballd/report_june112010.pdf
24.
KressGuenther, and KoehlerGustav. 1980. “Policy drift: An evaluation of the california business enterprise program.” Policy Studies Journal, 8(7):1101–1108.
25.
KropfM., VercellottiT., and KimballD. C. (2013). Representative Bureaucracy and Partisanship: The Implementation of Election Law. Public Administration Review, 73(2):242–252.
LipskyM. (1980). Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation.
28.
ManionAnita, KimballDavid, AnthonyJoseph, UdaniAdriano, and PritchardRyan. 2023. “Vote at any polling place: A Case Study of St. Louis County, Missouri.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 22(4):287–305.
29.
MansonPaul. 2024. “Women on the frontlines of democracy: Gender dynamics that structure local election administration in the United States.” RinfretSara. (eds.). Street-Level Public Servants, Routledge: New York, N.Y., 110–130.
30.
MansonPaul, AdonaNatalie, LeeJay, and GronkePaul. 2021. “Staffing the Stewards of Democracy: Gender, Race, and Representative Bureaucracy.”
31.
MettlerSuzanne. 2016. “The policyscape and the challenges of contemporary politics to policy maintenance.” Perspectives on Politics, 14(2):369–390.
32.
MohrZachary, PopeJoEllen V., KropfMartha E., and ShepherdMary Jo. 2019. “Strategic spending: Does politics influence election administration expenditure?” American Journal of Political Science, 63(2):427–438.
33.
MohrZachary, PopeJoEllen V., ShepherdMary Jo, KropfMartha, and HillAhmad. 2020. “Evaluating the recessionary impact on election administration budgeting and spending.” American Politics Research, 48(6):709–713.
34.
MontjoyRobert S. 2010. “The changing nature … and costs … of election administration.” Public Administration Review, 70(6):867–875.
35.
MorganDouglas F, GreenRichard, ShinnCraig, and RobinsonKent S. 2013. Foundations of Public Service. Second edition. M.E. Sharpe: Armonk, N.Y.
36.
MoselyLayna. 2013. Interview Research in Political Science. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY.
37.
MoynihanDonald P and LavertuStéphane. 2012. “Cognitive biases in governing: Technology preferences in Election Administration.” Public Administration Review, 72(1):68–77.
38.
MoynihanDonald P and SilvaCarol L.. 2008. “The administrators of democracy: A research note on local election officials.” Public Administration Review, 68(5):816–827.
RoccoPhilip and ThurstonChloe. 2014. “From metaphors to measures: Observable indicators of gradual institutional change.” Journal of Public Policy, 34(1):35–62.
45.
SeljanEllen, LochnerTodd, and WebbAlex. 2023. “The partisan costs of automatic voter registration.” Electoral Studies, 82:102591.
46.
SossJoe. 1999. “Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action.” American Political Science Review, 93(2):363–380.
47.
Suttmann-LeaMara. 2019. “Poll worker decision making at the American Ballot Box.” American Politics Research 1532673X20920266.
48.
SvaraJames H. 2001. “The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the Past and Future of Public Administration.”. Public Administration Review, 61(2):176–83.
49.
SvaraJames H. 2006. “Introduction: Politicians and Administrators in the Political Process—A Review of Themes and Issues in the Literature.”. Intl Journal of Public Administration, 29(12):953–76.
50.
United States Presidential Commission on Election Administration. 2014. The American Voting Experience: Report and Recommendations of the Presidential Commission on Election Administration. Presidential Commission on Election Administration.
51.
WhiteAriel R., NathanNoah L., and FallerJulie K.. 2015. “What do i need to vote? Bureaucratic discretion and discrimination by local election officials.” American Political Science Review, 109(1):129–142.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
