Abstract
Gerrymandering has become much more frequent in the United States in the past 20 years. Researchers have developed measures, such as the efficiency gap, to help courts adjudicate whether a redistricting plan is an outlier compared with other nonpartisan plans. This study evaluates two of these measures: the efficiency gap and the mean–median difference. Using a simulation approach, I evaluate whether current implementations of these measures accurately determine whether a district is an outlier relative to simulated maps generated without any explicit partisan consideration. The results show that the threshold currently used for the efficiency gap measure is arbitrary and inefficient and is sensitive to the geographic distribution of voters from each party. For the mean–median difference, the results raise serious concerns about the basic assumption behind the measure’s design.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
