As a response to foreign election interference efforts, politicians and news media have adopted various frames which highlight the hinderance of such interference in electoral processes. However, little research has examined the impact of the framing of this election interference discourse on the attitudes and behaviours of voters. This research examines the impact of negative and positive election interference frames on Canadian voters using an experimental vignette design. Specifically, this study focuses on three dependent variables: citizens' trust in electoral institutions, their likelihood of voting, and their level of comfort using alternative methods of electoral participation. The results suggest that the framing of information on the topic of election interference can have an important impact on citizens' attitudes toward the electoral process. We find that positive, but not negative, information regarding election interference influences respondents' trust in the electoral system. We also find that the effect is greatest in politically uninterested individuals. Lastly, the results show that conservatives hold more negative attitudes towards elections and voting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aird, MichaelJ., EckerUllrich K. H., SwireBriony, BerinskyAdam J., and Lewandowsky.Stephan. 2018. “Does Truth Matter to Voters? The Effects of Correcting Political Misinformation in an Australian Sample.”. Royal Society Open Science, 5(12): 1805; 93. <https://doi.org/doi:10.1098/rsos.180593>.
2.
AlvarezR. Michael, CaoJian, and LiYimeng. 2021. “Voting Experiences, Perceptions of Fraud, and Voter Confidence.” Social Science Quarterly, 102(4): 1225–1238.
3.
AlvarezR Michael, HallThad E, LevinInes, and IIICharles Stewart. 2011. “Voter Opinions About Election Reform: Do They Support Making Voting More Convenient?” Election Law Journal, 10(2): 73–87.
4.
AtkesonLonna Rae, and SaundersKyle L. 2007. “The Effect of Election Administration on Voter Confidence: A Local Matter?” PS: Political Science & Politics, 40(4): 655–660.
5.
AtzmüllerChristiane, and SteinerPeter M.. 2010. “Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research.” Methodology, 6(3): 128–138.
BlaisAndré, and DaoustJean-François. 2020. The Motivation to Vote: Explaining Electoral Participation. UBC Press: Vancouver.
10.
BootWalter R., SimonsDaniel J., StothartCary, and StuttsCassie. 2013. “The Pervasive Problem With Placebos in Psychology:Why Active Control Groups Are Not Sufficient to Rule Out Placebo Effects.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(4): 445–454. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613491271>.
11.
BordeleauJean-Nicolas.2021. “Securing Elections: A Comparative Assessment of Canada's Response to Foreign Interference.”. Centre for International and Defence Policy, 7(3).
12.
BordeleauJean-Nicolas.2022. Do Unfounded Claims of Election Fraud Influence the Likelihood of Voting? Université de Montréal: Montréal.
13.
BowlerShaun, BrunellThomas, DonovanTodd, and GronkePaul. 2015. “Election Administration and Perceptions of Fair Elections.” Electoral Studies, 38: 1–9. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.01.004>.
14.
BubeckJohannes, JägerKai, MarinovNikolay, and NanniFederico. 2020. “Why Do States Intervene in the Elections of Others? The Role of Incumbent–Opposition Divisions.” British Journal of Political Science:. 1–22.
15.
BubeckJohannes, and MarinovNikolay. 2019. Rules and Allies:Foreign Election Interventions. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
CarrerasMiguel, and VeraSofia. 2018. “Do Corrupt Politicians Mobilize or Demobilize Voters? A Vignette Experiment in Colombia.” Latin American Politics and Society, 60(3): 77–95.
18.
CatterbergGabriela, and MorenoAlejandro. 2006. “The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies.” International journal of public opinion research, 18(1): 31–48.
19.
ChanSophia.1997. “Effects of Attention to Campaign Coverage on Political Trust.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9(3): 286–296.
20.
ChongDennis, and DruckmanJames N. 2007a. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies.” American Political Science Review, 101(4): 637–655.
21.
ChongDennis, and DruckmanJames N. 2007b. “A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments.” Journal of communication, 57(1): 99–118.
22.
ClintonJoshua D, LapinskiJohn, LentzSarah, and PettigrewStephen. 2021. “Trumped by Trump? Public Support for Mail Voting in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 21(1): 19–33.
CookTimothy E, and GronkePaul. 2005. “The Skeptical American: Revisiting the Meanings of Trust in Government and Confidence in Institutions.” The Journal of Politics, 67(3): 784–803.
25.
CorstangeDaniel, and MarinovNikolay. 2012. “Taking Sides in Other People's Elections: The Polarizing Effect of Foreign Intervention.” American Journal of Political Science, 56(3): 655–670.
26.
DruckmanJames N, and LeeperThomas J. 2012. “Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its Effects.” American Journal of Political Science, 56(4): 875–896.
27.
EckerUllrich KH, and AngLi Chang. 2019. “Political Attitudes and the Processing of Misinformation Corrections.” Political Psychology, 40(2): 241–260.
GarnettHolly Ann, BordeleauJean-Nicolas, StephensonLaura B., and HarellAllison. 2023. “Contagious Elections: The Influence of COVID-19 on Comfort in Voting in Canadian Provincial Elections.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 22(2): 117–128.
30.
GarnettHolly Ann, BordeleauJean-Nicolas, HarellAllison, and Stephenson.Laura. 2021. “Canadian Provincial Elections During the Covid-19 Pandemic.”. Electoral Integrity Project.
KarpJeffrey A, and BrockingtonDavid. 2005. “Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysis of Overreporting Voter Turnout in Five Countries.” The Journal of Politics, 67(3): 825–840.
33.
KerrNicholas, and LührmannAnna. 2017. “Public Trust in Manipulated Elections: The Role of Election Administration and Media Freedom.” Electoral Studies, 50: 50–67. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.08.003>.
34.
KleinnijenhuisJan, HoofAnita MJ Van, and OegemaDirk. 2006. “Negative News and the Sleeper Effect of Distrust.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(2): 86–104.
LevinDov H.2016. “When the Great Power Gets a Vote: The Effects of Great Power Electoral Interventions on Election Results.” International Studies Quarterly, 60(2): 189–202.
38.
LevinDov H.2019a. “Partisan Electoral Interventions by the Great Powers: Introducing the PEIG Dataset.” Conflict Management and Peace Science, 36(1): 88–106.
39.
LevinDov H.2019b. “A Vote for Freedom? The Effects of Partisan Electoral Interventions on Regime Type.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63(4): 839–868.
40.
LevinDov H.2020. Meddling in the Ballot Box: The Causes and Effects of Partisan Electoral Interventions. Oxford University Press, USA.
41.
MarinovNikolay.2013. “Voter Attitudes when Democracy Promotion Turns Partisan: Evidence from a Survey-Experiment in Lebanon.” Democratization, 20(7): 1297–1321.
PennycookGordon, and Rand.David G. 2021. “Examining False Beliefs About Voter Fraud in the Wake of the 2020 Presidential Election.”. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review.
PriorMarkus.2005. “News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science, 49(3): 577–592.
47.
SchulzWinfried.2008. Politische Kommunikation: Theoretische Ansätze und Ergebnisse empirischer Forschung. Springer-Verlag.
48.
ShulmanStephen, and BloomStephen. 2012. “The Legitimacy of Foreign Intervention in Elections: the Ukrainian Response.” Review of International Studies, 38(2): 445–471.
49.
SmetsKaat, and HamCarolien van. 2013. “The Embarrassment of Riches? A Meta-Analysis of Individual-Level Research on Voter Turnout.” Electoral Studies, 32(2): 344–359. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.006>.
50.
StevensDaniel.2008. “The Relationship Between Negative Political Advertising and Public Mood: Effects and Consequences.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18(2): 153–177.
51.
StevensDaniel.2009. “Elements of Negativity: Volume and Proportion in Exposure to Negative Advertising.” Political Behavior, 31(3): 429–454. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/40587292>.
52.
StockemerDaniel, LaMontagneBernadette, and ScruggsLyle. 2013. “Bribes and ballots: The Impact of Corruption on Voter Turnout in Democracies.” International political science review, 34(1): 74–90.
53.
TomzMichael, and WeeksJessica LP. 2020. “Public Opinion and Foreign Electoral Intervention.” American Political Science Review, 114(3): 856–873.
UdaniAdriano, KimballDavid C, and FogartyBrian. 2018. “How Local Media Coverage of Voter Fraud Influences Partisan Perceptions in the United States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 18(2): 193–210.
57.
UslanerEric M.2018. The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford University Press.
58.
Von BorzyskowskiInken.2016. “Resisting Democracy Assistance: Who Seeks and Receives Technical Election Assistance?” The Review of International Organizations, 11(2): 247–282.
59.
ZallerJohn, and FeldmanStanley. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions Versus Revealing Preferences.” American Journal of Political Scienc:. 579–616.
60.
ZallerJohn R.1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
