The disruptive effects of redistricting on mass political behavior remain under-explored. Although studies have assessed how redistricting influences candidate recognition (knowledge) and voter preferences, most of these works have faced considerable data limitations. With detailed geographic indicators and panel data from 2010-2012, the Cooperative Election Study makes it possible to determine “Same” respondents who retain the same incumbent seeking reelection and “Redrawn” respondents who find themselves with a different incumbent running in 2012. We expect that this redistricting-induced classification of Redrawn and Same constituents generates considerable variation in respondents' knowledge, vote choice, as well as concerns about representation. In light of the redistricting occurring after the 2020 Census, our research provides scholars with a richer and clearer picture of the extent to which redistricting alters the behavior and attitudes of the mass electorate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnsolabehereStephen, SnyderJames M.Jr., and StewartCharles, III. 2000. “Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science, 44(1):17–34.
2.
AshtonBenjamin H., CrespinMichael H., and McKeeSeth C.. 2022. “Dueling Incumbent House Elections, 1843-2018.” Forthcoming, American Politics Research, 50(6):735–742.
3.
Baker et al. v. Carr et al., 369 U.S. 186 (1962)
4.
BlackEarl and MerleBlack. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Karcher v. Daggett, 462 U.S. 725 (1983) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BlackEarl and Merle Black.2007. Divided America: The Ferocious Power Struggle in American Politics. New York: Simon and Schuster.
6.
BoatrightRobert G.2004. “Static Ambition in a Changing World: Legislators' Preparations for, and Responses to, Redistricting.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 4(4):436–454.
7.
BowenDaniel C.2014. “Boundaries, Redistricting Criteria, and Representation in the US House of Representatives.” American Politics Research, 42(5):856–895.
8.
BrunellThomas L.2010. Redistricting and Representation: Why Competitive Elections are Bad for America. New York: Routledge.
9.
BuchlerJustin.2005. “Competition, Representation and Redistricting: The Case Against Competitive Congressional Districts.” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 17(4):431–463.
10.
BullockCharles S.2010. Redistricting: The Most Political Activity in America. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
11.
BurdenBarry C. and Rochelle Snyder.2021. “Explaining Uncontested Seats in Congress and State Legislatures.” American Politics Research, 49(3):247–258.
12.
ButlerDavid and Bruce E.Cain. 1992. Congressional Redistricting: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives. Prentice Hall.
13.
CainBruce, FerejohnJohn, and FiorinaMorris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
CoxGary W. and Jonathan N. Katz.2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
CrumpRichard K., HotzV. Joseph, ImbensGuido W., and MitnikOscar A.. 2009. “Dealing with Limited Overlap in Estimation of Average Treatment Effects.” Biometrika, 96(1):187–199.
16.
DesposatoScott W. and John R. Petrocik.2003. “The Variable Incumbency Advantage: New Voters, Redistricting, and the Personal Vote.” American Journal of Political Science, 47(1):18–32.
17.
DownsAnthony.1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
18.
EdwardsBarry, CrespinMichael, WilliamsonRyan D., and PalmerMaxwell. 2017. “Institutional Control of Redistricting and the Geography of Representation.” The Journal of Politics, 79(2):722–726.
19.
FennoJr., FRichard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in their Districts. New York: Longman.
20.
GelmanAndrew and Gary King.1994. “Enhancing Democracy through Legislative Redistricting.” American Political Science Review, 88(3):541–559.
21.
GoedertNicholas.2017. “The Pseudoparadox of Partisan Mapmaking and Congressional Competition.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 17(1):47–75.
22.
HayesDanny and Seth C. McKee.2009. “The Participatory Effects of Redistricting.” American Journal of Political Science, 53(4):1006–1023.
23.
HayesMatthew, HibbingMatthew V., and SulkinTracy. 2010. “Redistricting, Responsiveness, and Issue Attention.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35(1):91–115.
24.
HendersonJohn A., HamelBrian T., and GoldzimerAaron M.. 2018. “Gerrymandering Incumbency: Does Nonpartisan Redistricting Increase Electoral Competition?” The Journal of Politics, 80(3):1011–1016.
25.
HetheringtonMarc J., LarsonBruce, and GlobettiSuzanne. 2003. “The Redistricting Cycle and Strategic Candidate Decisions in US House Races.” The Journal of Politics, 65(4):1221–1234.
26.
HicksWilliam D. and Seth C. McKee.2021. “Pennsylvania in 2018: How Redistricting Does and Doesn't Make a Difference.” State and Local Government Review, 53(2):172–180.
27.
Hood IIIM.V. and Seth C. McKee.2008. “Gerrymandering on Georgia's Mind: The Effects of Redistricting on Vote Choice in the 2006 Midterm Election.” Social Science Quarterly, 89(1):60–77.
28.
Hood IIIM.V. and Seth C. McKee.2010. “Stranger Danger: Redistricting, Incumbent Recognition, and Vote Choice.” Social Science Quarterly, 91(2):344–358.
29.
Hood IIIM.V. and Seth C. McKee.2013. “Unwelcome Constituents: Redistricting and Countervailing Partisan Tides.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 13(2):203–224.
30.
ImbensGuido W.2015. “Matching Methods in Practice: Three Examples.” Journal of Human Resources, 50(2):373–419.
31.
JacobsonGary C.2014. Congress: Partisanship and Polarization. In The Elections of 2012, ed. Michael Nelson. Washington, DC: CQ Press pp. 145–172.
32.
JacobsonGary C.2015. “It's Nothing Personal: The Decline of the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics, 77(3):861–873.
33.
JacobsonGary C. and Jamie L. Carson.2020. The Politics of Congressional Elections. Karcher v. Daggett, 462 U.S. 725 (1983) New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
34.
Karcher v. Daggett, 462 U.S. 725 (1983)
35.
LadewigJeffrey W.2018. “‘Appearances Do Matter’: Congressional District Compactness and Electoral Turnout.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 17(2):137–150.
36.
LeeFrances E.2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
LublinDavid.1999. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
MansbridgeJane.2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review, 97(4):515–528.
39.
MasonLilliana.2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
McDonaldMichael P.2004. “A Comparative Analysis of Redistricting Institutions in the United States, 2001–02.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 4(4):371–395.
42.
McDonaldMichael P.2006. “Drawing the Line on District Competition.” PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(1):91–94.
43.
McGannAnthony J., SmithCharles Anthony, LatnerMichael, and KeenaAlex. 2016. Gerrymandering in America: The House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, and the Future of Popular Sovereignty. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44.
McKeeSeth C.2008. “The Effects of Redistricting on Voting Behavior in Incumbent U.S. House Elections, 1992-1994.” Political Research Quarterly, 61(1):122–133.
45.
McKeeSeth C.2010. Republican Ascendancy in Southern U.S. House Elections. New York: Routledge.
46.
McKeeSeth C.2013. “Political Conditions and the Electoral Effects of Redistricting.” American Politics Research, 41(4):623–650.
47.
McKeeSeth C., TeigenJeremy M., and TurgeonMathieu. 2006. “The Partisan Impact of Congressional Redistricting: The Case of Texas, 2001–2003.” Social Science Quarterly, 87(2):308–317.
48.
PetrocikJohn R. and Scott W. Desposato.1998. “The Partisan Consequences of Majority-Minority Redistricting in the South, 1992 and 1994.” The Journal of Politics, 60(3):613–633.
49.
RosenbaumPaul R. and Donald BRubin.1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika, 70(1):41–55.
50.
SchaffnerBrian and StephenAnsolabehere. 2015. 2010-2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study Panel Survey. <https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TOE8I1>
51.
TateKatherine.2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
WinburnJonathan, HendersonMichael, and DowlingConor M.. 2017. “From the Constituent's Eye: Experimental Evidence on the District Selection Preferences of Individuals.” Political Research Quarterly, 70(1):32–41.
53.
WinburnJonathan and MichaelW. Wagner.2010. “Carving Voters Out: Redistricting's Influence on Political Information, Turnout, and Voting Behavior.” Political Research Quarterly, 63(2):373–386.
54.
YoshinakaAntoine.2020. “Redistricting and Incumbent Types: Which Legislators Are More Vulnerable to an Adverse Gerrymander?” Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, San Juan, Puerto Rico, January 2020.
55.
YoshinakaAntoine and ChadMurphy. 2011. “The Paradox of Redistricting: How Partisan Mapmakers Foster Competition but Disrupt Representation.” Political Research Quarterly, 64(2):435–447.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
