How much is support for vote by mail (VBM) impacted by partisan considerations and personal considerations related to the COVID-19 pandemic? Using surveys of registered voters conducted in April and May 2020 designed to assess the support for various electoral reforms, we show that the overall support for expanding VBM in April 2020 falls sharply after just six weeks because Republicans became less worried about catching COVID-19, and unconcerned Republicans became far more opposed to VBM. These differences not only persisted, but actually increased even further between May and Election Day according to a survey done using a different methodology in November 2020. Public support for other reforms that were intended to make voting easier were largely unchanged, however. The pattern of opinion changes we document—perhaps a result of the intense partisan messaging that occurred during the time period of our study—highlights the importance of partisanship and personal considerations for public support for election reforms and also the widespread public support for most proposed reforms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhlerDouglas J., and BroockmanDavid E.. 2018. “The Delegate Paradox: Why Polarized Politicians Can Represent Citizens Best.” Journal of Politics, 80(4): 1117–1133.
2.
AlvarezR. Michael, HallThad E., LevinInes, and StewartCharles. 2011. “Voter Opinions about Election Reform: Do They Support Making Voting More Convenient?” Election Law Journal, 10(2): 73–87.
3.
AnsolabehereStephen, PersilyNathaniel, and IIICharles Stewart. 2016. “Revisiting Public Opinion on Voter Identification and Voter Fraud in an Era of Increasing Partisan Polarization.” Stanford Law Review, 68(6): 1455–1489.
4.
AshokVivekinan, FederDaniel, McGrathMary, and HershEitan. 2016. “The Dynamic Election: Patterns of Early Voting Across Time, State, Party, and Age.” Election Law Journal, 15(2): 115–128.
5.
BarberMichael J., and PopeJeremy C.. 2018. “Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America.” American Political Science Review, 113(1): 38–54.
6.
BartelsLarry M.2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24 (2):. 117–150.
BerinskyAdam, BurnsNancy, and TraugottMichael. 2001. “Who Votes by Mail? A Dynamic Model of the Individual-Level Consequences of Voting-by-Mail Systems.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(2): 178–197.
9.
BoudreauCheryl, and MackenzieScott A.. 2014. “Informing the Electorate? How Party Cues and Policy Information Affect Public Opinion about Initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science, 58(1): 48–62.
BroockmanDavid E., and ButlerDaniel M.. 2017. “The Causal Effects of Elite Position-Taking on Voter Attitudes: Field Experiments with Elite Communication.” American Journal of Political Science, 61(1): 208–221.
12.
BullockJohn G.2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review, 105(3): 496–515.
13.
BurdenBarry C., CanonDavid T., MayerKenneth R., and MoynihanDonald P.. 2009. The Effects and Costs of Early Voting, Election Day Registration, and Same Day Registration in the 2008 Elections. Report presented to the Pew Charitable Trusts, December 21. Madison, WI: University of. Wisconsin–Madison.
14.
BurdenBarry C., CanonDavid T., MayerKenneth R., and MoynihanDonald P.. 2011. “Early Voting and Election Day Registration in the Trenches: Local Officials' Perceptions of Election Reform.” Election Law Journal, 10(2): 89–102.
15.
BurdenBarry C., CanonDavid T., MayerKenneth R., and MoynihanDonald P.. 2017. “The Complicated Partisan Effects of State Election Laws.” Public Research Quarterly, 70(3): 564–576.
16.
ClintonJoshua D., CohenJon, LapinskiJohn, and Trussler.Mark. 2021. “Partisan Pandemic: How Partisanship and Public Health Concerns Affect Individuals' Social Mobility During COVID-19.” Science Advances 7(2). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd7204.
17.
DruckmanJames N., PetersonErik, and SlothuusRune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review, 107(1): 57–79.
18.
GreenDonald P., PalmquistBradley, and SchicklerEric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
GronkePaul, Galanes-RosenbaumEva, and MillerPeter A.. 2007. “Early Voting and Turnout.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(4): 639–645.
20.
GronkePaul, and MillerPeter. 2012. “Voting by Mail and Turnout in Oregon: Revisiting Southwell and Burchett.” American Politics Research, 40(6): 976–997.
21.
KropfMartha E.2012. “Does Early Voting Change the Socio-Economic Composition of the Electorate?” Poverty & Public Policy, 4(1): 1–19.
22.
LenzGabriel S.2009. “Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science, 53(4): 821–837.
23.
LenzGabriel S.2012. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians' Policies and Performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24.
MannChristopher.2014. “Mail Ballots in the United States: Policy Choice and Administrative Challenges.” In The Measure of American Elections, eds. Barry Burden and Charles Stewart III,113–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
McCarthyKevin.2020. “As major legislation from the first 3 phases is implemented, the American people cannot afford continued attempts to force partisan objectives into our coronavirus response—especially when they have nothing to do with our war against the disease.” Twitter, April 1, 1:24 p.m. <https://twitter.com/GOPLeader/status/1245431874413105153>.
26.
MeredithMarc, and MalhotraNeil. 2011. “Convenience Voting Can Affect Election Outcomes.” Election Law Journal, 10(3): 227–253.
NicholsonStephen P.2011. “Dominating Cues and the Limits of Elite Influence.” Journal of Politics 73 (4):. 1165–1177.
31.
RicheySean.2005. “Who Votes Alone? The Impact of Voting by Mail on Political Discussion.” Australian Journal of Political Science, 40(3): 435–442.
32.
SancesMichael W., and IIICharles Stewart. 2015. “Partisanship and Confidence in the Vote Count: Evidence from U.S. National Elections Since 2000.” Electoral Studies, 40: 176–188.
33.
ShorBoris, and McCartyNolan. 2010. “The Ideological Mapping of State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review, 105(3): 530–551.
34.
SmithKeith, and SylvesterDari E.. 2013. “Is It the Message or the Person? Lessons from a Field Experiment About Who Converts to Permanent Vote by Mail.” Election Law Journal, 12(3): 243–260.
35.
SouthwellPriscilla L.2004. “Five Years Later: A Re-Assessment of Oregon's Vote by Mail Electoral Process.” PS: Politics and Political Science, 37(1): 89–93.
36.
SouthwellPriscilla L., and BurchettJustin. 1997. “Survey of Vote-by-Mail Senate Election in the State of Oregon.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 30(1): 53–57.
37.
SteinRobert M.1998. “Early Voting.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 62(1): 57–69.
38.
SteinRobert M., and Garcia-MonetPatricia A.. 1997. “Voting Early, But Not Often.” Social Science Quarterly, 78(3): 657–671.
39.
StewartCharles.2011. “Adding up the Costs and Benefits of Voting by Mail.” Election Law Journal, 10(3): 297–301.
40.
StewartCharles.2017. “2016 Survey of the Performance of American Elections.” Harvard Dataverse, VI, <https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Y38VIQ>.
41.
StewartCharles.2021. “2020 Survey of the Performance of American Elections.” Harvard Dataverse, VI, <https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FSGX7Z>.
42.
ThompsonDennis F.2004. “Election Time: Normative Implications of Temporal Properties of the Electoral Process in the United States.” American Political Science Review, 98(1): 51–64.
WalkerHannah L., HerronMichael C., and SmithDaniel A.. 2019. “Early Voting Changes and Voter Turnout: North Carolina in the 2016 General Election.” Political Behavior, 41: 841–869.
YoderJesse, Handan-HaderCassandra, MyersAndrew, NowackiTobias, ThompsonDanial M., WuJennifer A., YorgasonChenoa, and HallAndrew. 2021. “How Did Absentee Voting Affect the 2020 U.S. Election?” Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Working Paper No. 21-011. Available at: <https://siepr.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/21-011.pdf>.
49.
ZallerJohn R.1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
