Malapportionment is a widely used tool of electoral manipulation in both authoritarian and democratic countries. Although its impact on electoral and policy outcomes has received considerable scholarly attention, the impact of malapportionment on electoral participation has been neglected. This is partly because it is difficult to isolate the effect of malapportionment on electoral participation from that of other factors. To the best of my knowledge, this study is the first to examine the effect of malapportionment on electoral participation. I avoid the methodological problem by taking advantage of the unique characteristics of Japan's upper house election laws. Using an original dataset on Japan's upper house elections and employing a differences-in-differences design, my results show that malapportionment increases voter turnout (by an average of 2.9 percentage points and up to 8.0 percentage points). This study therefore contributes to the literature on election laws and political participation by providing strong evidence for the effect of malapportionment on voter turnout and showing that some forms of electoral manipulation can increase voter turnout.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnsolabehereStephen, GerberAlan, and SnyderJim (2002). “Equal Votes, Equal Money: Court-Ordered Redistricting and Public Expenditures in the American States.” American Political Science Review, 96(4): 767–777.
2.
AnsolabehereStephen, and Jim Snyder (2008). The End of Inequality: One Person, One Vote and the Transformation of American Politics. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
3.
ArdanazMartin, and ScartasciniCarlos (2013). “Inequality and Personal Income Taxation: The Origins and Effects of Legislative Malapportionment.” Comparative Political Studies, 46(12): 1636–1663.
Asahi Shimbun (2013). “Questions and Responses.” Asahi Shimbun, May 2: 17.
6.
Asahi Shimbun (2015). “The Komeito and the Democratic Party of Japan Sponsored the Revised Public Offices Election Law.” Asahi Shimbun, July 15: 4.
7.
Asahi Shimbun (2015). “The Revised Public Offices Election Law Was Enacted.” Asahi Shimbun, July 29: 1.
8.
Asahi Shimbun (2015). “Statements on the Enactment of the Revised Public Offices Election Law.” Asahi Shimbun, July 31: 4.
9.
BanducciSusan A., DonovanTodd, and KarpJeffrey A. (1999). “Proportional Representation and Attitudes about Politics: Results from New Zealand.” Electoral Studies, 18(4): 533–555.
10.
BirchSarah (2010). “Perceptions of Electoral Fairness and Voter Turnout.” Comparative Political Studies, 43(12): 1601–1622.
11.
BlaisAndré (2006). “What Affects Voter Turnout?” Annual Review of Political Science, 9: 111–125.
12.
CancelaJoão, and GeysBenny (2016). “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-Analysis of National and Subnational Elections.” Electoral Studies, 42: 264–275.
13.
EzrowLawrence, and XezonakisGeorgios (2016). “Satisfaction with Democracy and Voter Turnout: A Temporal Perspective.” Party Politics, 22(1): 3–14.
14.
GeysBenny (2006). “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-Level Research.” Electoral Studies, 25(4): 637–663.
15.
GreensteinClaire, and HarveyCole J. (2017). “Trials, Lustration, and Clean Elections: The Uneven Effects of Transitional Justice Mechanisms on Electoral Manipulation.” Democratization, 24(6): 1195–1214.
16.
HasenRichard (2003). The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore. New York, NY: New York University Press.
17.
HaukWilliam R.Jr., and WacziargRomain (2007). “Small States, Big Pork.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2(1): 95–106.
18.
HayesDanny, and McKeeSeth C. (2009). “The Participatory Effects of Redistricting.” American Journal of Political Science, 53(4): 1006–1023.
19.
HayesDanny, and McKeeSeth C. (2012). “The Intersection of Redistricting, Race, and Participation.” American Journal of Political Science, 56(1): 115–130.
20.
HoriuchiYusaku, and SaitoJun (2003). “Reapportionment and Redistribution: Consequences of Electoral Reform in Japan.” American Journal of Political Science, 47(4): 669–682.
21.
HuntCharles R. (2018). “When Does Redistricting Matter? Changing Conditions and Their Effects on Voter Turnout.” Electoral Studies, 54: 128–138.
22.
JackmanRobert W. (1987). “Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies.” American Political Science Review, 81(2): 405–424.
23.
JackmanRobert W., and MillerRoss A. (1995). “Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies During the 1980s.” Comparative Political Studies, 27(4): 467–492.
24.
JohnstonRon, PattieCharles, DorlingDanny, and RossiterDavid. 2001. From Votes to Seats: The Operation of the UK Electoral System Since 1945. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
25.
KarpJeffrey A., and BanducciSusan A. (1999). “The Impact of Proportional Representation on Turnout: Evidence from New Zealand.” Australian Journal of Political Science, 34(3): 363–377.
26.
KarpJeffrey A., BanducciSusan A., and BowlerShaun (2007). “Getting Out the Vote: Party Mobilization in a Comparative Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science, 38(1): 91–112.
27.
LarcineseValentino, RizzoLeonzio, and TestaCecilia (2013). “Why Do Small States Receive More Federal Money? U.S. Senate Representation and the Allocation of Federal Budget.” Economics and Politics, 25(3): 257–282.
28.
LeeFrances E. (2000). “Senate Representation and Coalition Building in Distributive Politics.” American Political Science Review, 94(1): 59–72.
29.
LeeFrances E., and I.Bruce Oppenheimer (1999). Sizing Up the Senate: The Unequal Consequences of Equal Representation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
LehoucqFabrice (2003). “Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science, 6: 233–256.
31.
McCannJames A., and DomınguezJorge I. (1998). “Mexicans React to Electoral Fraud and Political Corruption: An Assessment of Public Opinion and Voting Behavior.” Electoral studies, 17(4): 483–503.
32.
McKeeSeth C. (2008). “Redistricting and Familiarity with U.S. House Candidates.” American Politics Research, 36(6): 962–979.
NorrisPippa (2002). Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Norris Pippa (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
NorrisPippa (2014). Why Electoral Integrity Matters. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37.
OngKian-Ming, KasuyaYuko, and MoriKota (2017). “Malapportionment and Democracy: A Curvilinear Relationship.” Electoral Studies, 49: 118–127.
38.
PattieCharles, JohnstonRon, and RossiterDavid (2012). “Change the Seats, Change the Participation? Parliamentary Redistricting and Constituency Turnout.” Representation, 48(4): 419–428.
39.
PowellG. BinghamJr. (1986). “American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review, 80(1): 17–43.
40.
SamuelsDavid, and SnyderRichard (2004). “The Value of a Vote: Malapportionment in Comparative Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science, 31(1): 97–109.
41.
SchedlerAndreas (2002). “Elections Without Democracy: The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy, 13(2): 36–50.
42.
ScheinerEthan (2006). Democracy Without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure in a One-Party Dominant State. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
43.
SimpserAlberto(2013). Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44.
SmetsKaat, and HamCarolien van (2013). “The Embarrassment of Riches? A Meta-Analysis of Individual-Level Research on Voter Turnout.” Electoral Studies, 32(2): 344–359.
45.
SmithDaniel M. (2018). “Electoral Rules and Voter Turnout.” In Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems, eds. Erik Herron, Robert Pekkanen, and Matthew Shugart, 193–212. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
46.
SnyderRichard, and SamuelsDavid J. (2001). “Legislative Malapportionment in Latin America: Historical and Comparative Perspectives.” In Federalism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Edward L. Gibson, 131–172. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
47.
StockemerDaniel (2017). “What Affects Voter Turnout? A Review Article/Meta-Analysis of Aggregate Research.” Government and Opposition, 52(4): 698–722.
48.
WinburnJonathan, and WagnerMichael W. (2010). “Carving Voters Out: Redistricting's Influence on Political Information, Turnout, and Voting Behavior.” Political Research Quarterly, 63(2): 373–386.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
