Previous research shows that multimember districts (MMDs) disadvantage African American candidates. However, these studies focus on only a few aspects of the electoral process and they may be time bound. Using a new data set, we examine the impact of district magnitude (the number of candidates elected from a single constituency) on the emergence, nomination, and general election of African Americans to the state legislature. Using data from recent elections to the Maryland state legislature, we find no evidence that district magnitude dims the electoral prospects of African American candidates. Our findings suggest that biases attributed to MMDs may have resulted from laws, partisan practices, customs, and political attitudes. The implementation of the Voting Rights Act, broad societal changes, and strategic adjustments by black candidates and voters may have mitigated the effects of previous biases resulting in the election of more African Americans in MMDs and other districts.
BarberMichael.2016. “Ideological Donors, Contribution Limits, and the Polarization of State Legislatures.” Journal of Politics, 78(1): 296–310.
3.
BarberMichael, ButlerDaniel, and PreeceJessica. 2016. “Gender Inequalities in Campaign Finance: A Regression Discontinuity Design.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11(2): 219–248.
BrockingtonDavid, DonovanTodd, BowlerShaun, and BrischettoRobert. 1998. “Minority Representation under Cumulative and Limited Voting.” Journal of Politics, 60(4): 1108–25.
6.
BullockCharles S. III, and GaddieRonald Keith. 1993. “Changing from Multimember to Single-Member Districts: Partisan, Racial and Gender Consequences.” State and Local Government Review, 25: 155–163.
7.
CanonDavid T.1990. Actors, Athletes, and Astronauts: Political Amateurs in the United States Congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
EngstromRichard, and McDonaldMichael. 1982. “The Underrepresentation of Blacks on City Councils: Comparing the Structural and Socioeconomic Explanations for South/Non-South Differences.” Journal of Politics, 44: 1088–99.
9.
EngstromRichard, and McDonald.Michael. 1986. “The Effect of At-Large Versus District Elections on Racial Representation in U.S. Municipalities.” In Bernard Grofman and Arend Liphart, eds. Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press.
10.
EngstromRichard, and McDonaldMichael. 1993. “‘Enhancing’ Factors in At-Large Plurality and Majority Systems: A Reconsideration.” Electoral Systems, 12(4): 385–401.
11.
FordPearl K., JohnsonTekia A., and MaxwellAngie. 2009. “‘Yes We Can’ or ‘Yes We Did’? Perspective and Retrospective Change in the Obama Presidency.” Journal of Black Studies, 40(3): 462–483.
12.
GerberElizabeth R., MortonRebecca, and RietzThomas A.. 1998. “Minority Representation in Multimember Districts.” American Political Science Review, 92: 127–144.
GriffinJohn D., and NewmanBrian. 2008. Minority Report: Evaluating Political Equality in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
GrofmanBernard, MigalskiMichael, and NovielloNicholas. 1986. “Effects of Multimember Districts on Black Representation in State Legislatures.” Review of Black Political Economy, 14: 65–78.
16.
GrofmanBernard, and Davidson.Chandler. 1994. “The Effect of Municipal Election Structure on Black Representation in Eight Southern States.” In Chandler Davidson and Bernard Grofman, eds. Quiet Revolution in the South. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
HadleyLisa, GrofmanBernard, and Arden.Wayne. 1998. “Electing Minority-Preferred Candidates to Legislative Office: The Relationship Between Minority Percentages in Districts and the Election of Minority-Preferred Candidates.” In Bernard Grofman, ed. Race and Redistricting in the 1990s. New York: Agathon Press.
18.
HanmerMichael J., and KalkanKerem Ozan. 2013. “Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models.” American Journal of Political Science, 57: 263–277.
19.
HajnalZoltan L.2001. “White Residents, Black Incumbents, and a Declining Racial Divide.” American Political Science Review, 95(3): 603–617.
20.
HajnalZoltan L.2006. Changing White Attitudes Toward Black Political Leadership. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HasenRichard L.2004. “Looking for Standards (in All the Wrong Places): Partisan Gerrymandering Claims after Vieth.” Election Law Journal, 3: 626–642.
22.
HerrickRebekah, and WelchSusan. 1992. “The Impact of At-Large Elections on the Representation of Black and White Women.” National Political Science Review, 3: 62–77.
23.
HerrnsonPaul S., TaylorJeffrey A., and CurryJames M.. 2015. “The Impact of District Magnitude on Voter Drop-Off and Roll-Off in American Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 40: 627–650.
24.
HerronMichael C., and SekhonJasjeet S.. 2005. “Black Candidates and Black Voters: Assessing the Impact of Candidate Race on Uncounted Vote Rates.” Journal of Politics, 67: 154–177.
25.
HerronMichael C.1999. “Postestimation Uncertainty in Limited Dependent Variable Models.” Political Analysis, 8(1): 83–98.
26.
HightonBenjamin.2004. “White Voters and African American Candidates for Congress.” Political Behavior, 26(1): 1–25.
27.
HiranoShigeo, and SnyderJames M.Jr.2009. “Using Multimember District Elections to Estimate the Sources of the Incumbency Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science, 53: 292–306.
28.
JuenkeEric Gonzalez, and ShahParu. 2016. “Demand and Supply: Racial and Ethnic Minority Candidates in White Districts.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 1(1): 60–90.
29.
LenzTimothy O., and PritchardAnita. 1991. “Florida Legislators' Perceptions of the Change to Single-Member Districts.” State & Local Government Review, 23(3): 134–138.
30.
LongJ. Scott.1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
LublinDavid.1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
LublinDavid.2004. The Republican South: Democratization and Partisan Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
MaiselL. Sandy, and StoneWalter J.. 1997. “Determinants of Candidate Emergence in U.S. House Elections: An Exploratory Study.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22: 79–96.
34.
MartisKenneth C.1982. The Historical Atlas of United States Congressional Districts. 1789–1983. New York: The Free Press.
35.
McGheeEric.2014. “Measuring Partisan Bias in Single-Member District Electoral Systems.”Legislative Studies Quarterly, 39(1): 55–85.
36.
MeierKenneth J., and RutherfordAmanda. 2014. “Partisanship, Structure, and Representation: The Puzzle of African American Education Politics.” American Political Science Review, 108: 265–280.
37.
MoncriefGary, and Thompson.Joel. 1992 ”Electoral Structure and State Legislative Representation: A Research Note.” Journal of Politics, 51(1): 246–56.
38.
MoncriefGary, SquirePeverill, and JewellMalcolm. 2001. Who Runs for the Legislature?. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39.
Municipal Year Book. 1998. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
40.
NiemiRichard G., JackmanSimon, and WinskyLaura R.. 1991. “Candidacies and Competitiveness in Multimember Districts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 16: 91–109.
41.
OreyByron D'Andra.2000. “Black Legislative Politics in Mississippi.” Journal of Black Studies, 30(6): 791–814.
42.
PapkeLeslie. E., Wooldridgeand, MJeffrey. 1996. “Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(k) Plan Participation Rates.” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6): 619–632.
43.
ParkerFrank R.1984. “Racial Gerrymandering and Legislative Reapportionment.” In DavidsonChandler, ed. Minority Vote Dilution. Washington, DC: Howard University Press.
44.
SchneiderMonica C., and BosAngela L.. 2011. “An Exploration of the Content of Stereotypes of Black Politicians.” Political Psychology, 32(2011): 205–233.
45.
Shelby County, Ala. v. Holder.. 2013. 133 S. Ct. 2612, 570 U.S. 2, 186 L. Ed. 2d 651.
46.
SmithC. Fraser.2008. Here Lies Jim Crow: Civil Rights in Maryland. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
47.
SmithHebert C., and WillisJohn T.. 2012. Maryland Politics and Government: Democratic Dominance. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
48.
SnyderJames M. Jr., and Ueda.Michiko. 2007. “Do Multimember Districts Lead to Free-Riding? “Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22: 649–679.
49.
SobelRichard, and SmithRobert Ellis. 2009. “Voter-ID Laws Discourage Participation, Particularly among Minorities, and Trigger a Constitutional Remedy in Lost Representation.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 42(1): 107–110.
50.
SrivastavaVirendra K., and GilesDavid E. A.. 1987. Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equation Models: Estimation and Inference. New York: Marcel Dekker.
51.
StephanopoulosNicholas O., and McGheeEric M.. 2015. “Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap.” University of Chicago Law Review, 82(2): 831–900.
52.
StoneWalter J., and MaiselL. Sandy. 2003. “The Not-So-Simple Calculus of Winning: Potential U.S. House Candidates' Nomination and General Election Prospects.” Journal of Politics, 65(4): 951–977.
53.
StoneWalter J., MaiselL. Sandy, and MaestasCherie D.. 2004. “Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent Deterrence.” American Journal of Political Science, 48: 479–95.
54.
SwainCarol M.1993. Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
SwersMichele L., and Rouse.Stella M.2011. “Descriptive Representation: Understanding the Impact of Identity on Substantive Representation of Group Interests.” In SchicklerEric and LeeFrances, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the American. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
TaylorJeffrey A., HerrnsonPaul S., and CurryJames M.. 2018. “The Impact of District Magnitude on the Legislative Behavior of State Representatives.”. Political Research Quarterly, 71: 302–317.
57.
Thornburg v. Gingles. 1986. 478 U.S. 30, 106 S. Ct. 2752, 92 L. Ed. 2d 25.
58.
TrounstineJessica, and ValdiniMelody E.. 2008. “The Context Matters: The Effects of Single-Member versus At-Large Districts on City Council Diversity.” American Journal of Political Science, 52(3): 554–569.
VerbaSidney, SchlozmanKay Lehman, and BradyHenry. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
WelchSusan.1990. “The Impact of At-Large Elections on the Representation of Blacks and Hispanics.” Journal of Politics, 52(4): 1050–76.
62.
WinburnJonathan.2008. The Realities of Redistricting: Following the Rules and Limiting Gerrymandering in State Legislative Redistricting. New York: Lexington Books.
63.
ZellnerArnold.1962. “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(298): 348–68.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
