We compare and contrast 14 measures that have been proposed for the purpose of quantifying partisan gerrymandering. We consider measures that, rather than examining the shapes of districts, utilize only the partisan vote distribution among districts. The measures considered are two versions of partisan bias, the efficiency gap and several of its variants, the mean-median difference and the equal vote weight standard, the declination and one variant, and the lopsided-means test. Our primary means of evaluating these measures is a suite of hypothetical elections we classify from the start as fair or unfair. We conclude that the declination is the most successful measure in terms of avoiding false positives and false negatives on the elections considered. We include in a Supplementary appendix the most extreme outliers for each measure among historical congressional and state legislative elections.
BangiaSachet, GravesChristy Vaughn, HerschlagGregory, KangHan Sung, LuoJustin, MattinglyJonathan C., and RavierRobert.2017. “Redistricting: Drawing the Line.” ArXiv e-prints. <http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.03360v2>.
3.
BernsteinMira and Moon Duchin.2017. “A Formula Goes to Court: Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap.” Notices of the AMS, 64(9): 1020–1024.
4.
BestRobin E., DonahueShawn J., KrasnoJonathan, MaglebyDaniel, and McDonaldMichael D.2017. “Considering the Prospects for Establishing a Packing Gerrymandering Standard.” Election Law Journal, 17(1): 1–20.
5.
BestRobin E., DonahueShawn J., KrasnoJonathan, MaglebyDaniel, and McDonaldMichael D.2018. “Authors' Response—Values and Validations: Proper Criteria for Comparing Standards for Packing Gerrymanders.” Election Law Journal, 17(1): 82–84.
6.
CainBruce E., ChoWendy K. Tam, LiuYan Y., and ZhangEmily R.2018. “A Reasonable Bias Approach to Gerrymandering: Using Automated Plan Generation to Evaluate Redistricting Proposals.” William & Mary Law Review, 59(5): 1521–1557.
7.
ChatterjeeTanima, DasGuptaBhaskar, PalmieriLaura, Al-QurashiZainab, and SidiropoulosAnastasios. 2018. “Alleviating Partisan Gerrymandering: Can Math and Computers Help to Eliminate Wasted Votes?” ArXiv e-prints. <http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.10577>.
8.
ChenJowei and Jonathan Rodden.2013. “Unintentional Gerrymandering: Political Geography and Electoral Bias in Legislatures.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8: 239–269.
9.
ChoWendy K. Tam.2017. “Measuring Partisan Fairness: How Well Does the Efficiency Gap Guard Against Sophisticated as Well as Simple-Minded Modes of Partisan Discrimination?” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 166(1): 1263–1321.
10.
CoverBenjamin P.2018. “Quantifying Partisan Gerrymandering: An Evaluation of the Efficiency Gap Proposal.” Stanford Law Review, 70(4): 1131–1233.
GelmanAndrew and GaryKing. 1994a. “Enhancing Democracy through Legislative Redistricting.”. American Political Science Review, 88: 541–559.
13.
GelmanAndrew and GaryKing. 1994b. “A Unified Method of Evaluating Electoral Systems and Redistricting Plans.”. American Journal of Political Science, 38: 514–554.
14.
HunterJ. D.2007. “Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment.” Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3): 90–95.
15.
JacobsonG. C.2017. Private communication.
16.
JonesE., OliphantT., PetersonP., etal. (2001–). “SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python.” <http://www.scipy.org/> (accessed Feb.8, 2017).
McGannAnthony J., SmithCharles A., LatnerMichael, and KeenaJ. Alex.2016. Gerrymandering in America: The House of Representatives, the Supreme Court, and the Future of Popular Sovereignty. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
McGannAnthony J., SmithCharles A., LatnerMichael, and KeenaJ. Alex.2015. “A Discernable and Manageable Standard for Partisan Gerrymandering.” Election Law Journal, 14(4): 295–311.
21.
McGheeEric.2014. “Measuring Partisan Bias in Single-Member District Electoral Systems.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 39(1): 55–85.
McGheeEric.2018. “Rejoinder to ‘Considering the Prospects for Establishing a Packing Gerrymandering Standard.’” Election Law Journal, 17(1): 73–82.
24.
McGheeEric and NicholasStephanopoulos. 2015. “Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap.” University of Chicago Law Review, 82(2): 831–900.
25.
NagleJohn F.2017. “How Competitive Should a Fair Single Member Districting Plan Be?” Election Law Journal, 16(1): 196–209.
26.
NagleJohn F.2015. “Measures of Partisan Bias for Legislating Fair Elections.” Election Law Journal, 14(4): 346–360.
27.
Stan Development Team. 2016. pyStan: The Python Interface to Stan, Version 2.14.0.0. <http://mc-stan.org>.
28.
SteinWilliam, al.et. 2016. Sage Mathematics Software (Version 7.1). Sage Development Team. <http://www.sagemath.org>.
29.
StephanopoulosNicholas O. and McGheeEric M.. 2018. “The Measure of a Metric: The Debate over Quantifying Partisan Gerrymandering.” Stanford Law Review, 70(5): 1503–1568.
TufteEdward R.1973. “The Relationship Between Seats and Votes in Two-Party Systems.” American Political Science Review, 67:(3) 540–554.
32.
VeomettEllen.2018. “The Efficiency Gap, Voter Turnout, and the Efficiency Principle.” Election Law Journal, 17(4): 249–263.
33.
WangSamuel S.-H.2016a. “Three Practical Tests for Gerrymandering: Application to Maryland and Wisconsin.”. Election Law Journal, 15(4): 367–384.
34.
WangSamuel S.-H.2016b. “Three Tests for Practical Evaluation of Partisan Gerrymandering.”. Stanford Law Review, 68(6): 1263–1321.
35.
WarringtonG. S.2018a. “Quantifying Gerrymandering Using the Vote Distribution.”. Election Law Journal, 17(1): 39–57.
36.
WarringtonGregory S.2018b. “Introduction to the Declination Function for Gerrymanders.”. ArXiv e-prints. <http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04799>.
37.
Warshaw Christopher and Nicholas Stephanopoulos.. 2019. “The Impact of Partisan Gerrymandering on Political Parties.” University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Paper Series, No. 695. <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3330695>.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
