Political scientists might hope to offer practitioners involved in debates about electoral reform insights regarding either the process of reform or its potential effects. In respect of each of these, the practitioners whom we engage might be either elite decision makers or the activists, journalists, and regular citizens who constitute the bedrock of democracy. The UK's electoral reform referendum of 2011 offers a good opportunity to explore the degree to which political scientists in fact offer original insights in these various areas. The article argues that, despite the great efforts that political scientists have expended in refining ever more sophisticated models of electoral system effects, elite practitioners have often—though not always—got there before us. By contrast, at least in the UK, practitioners sometimes fall short of political scientists in their understanding of how reform processes might unfold, and there is also a clear and strong need for political scientists to assist in educating public opinion. These findings have implications for how we should think about political science research: the research that practitioners most value is often not the research that has the highest prestige within the discipline.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amorim NetoOctavio, and CoxGary W. (1997). “Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties.”. American Journal of Political Science, 41, no. 1 (January), 149–74.
2.
ButlerD.E. (1963). The Electoral System in Britain since 1918, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
CareyJohn M. and ShugartMatthew Soberg (1995). “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.”. Electoral Studies, 14, no. 4 (December), 417–39.
4.
ClarkWilliam Roberts and GolderMatt (2006). “Rehabilitating Duverger's Theory: Testing the Mechanical and Strategic Modifying Effects of Electoral Laws.”. Comparative Political Studies, 39, no. 6 (August), 679–708.
5.
ColomerJosep M. (2005). “It's Parties that Choose Electoral Systems (or, Duverger's Laws Upside Down.”. Political Studies, 53, no. 1 (March), 1–21.
6.
ColomerJosep M., ed. (2011). Personal Representation: The Neglected Dimension of Electoral Systems. Colchester: ECPR Press.
7.
Conservative Party (2010). Invitation to Join the Government of Britain: The Conservative Party Manifesto 2010. London: Conservative Party.
8.
CurticeJohn and SteedMichael (1982). “Electoral Choice and the Production of Government: The Changing Operation of the Electoral System in the United Kingdom since 1955.”. British Journal of Political Science, 12, no. 3 (July), 249–98.
9.
DunleavyPatrick and MargettsHelen (1998). Report to the Government Office for London: Electoral the London Mayor and the London Assembly, 20January. Available at <http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/28883/>, accessed December16, 2016.
10.
Electoral Commission (2011). Referendum on the Voting System for UK Parliamentary Elections: Report on the May 2011 Referendum. London: Electoral Commission.
11.
FarrellDavid M. and GallagherMichael (1999). “British Voters and Their Criteria for Evaluating Electoral Systems.”. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1, no. 3 (October), 293–316.
12.
HartJenifer (1992). Proportional Representation: Critics of the British Electoral System, 1820–1945. Oxford: Clarendon.
13.
Independent Commission on the Voting System (1998). Report of the Independent Commission on the Voting System (CM 4090-I). London: The Stationery Office.
JohnstonRon, RossiterDavid, and PattieCharles (2006). “Disproportionality and Bias in the Results of the 2005 General Election in Great Britain: Evaluating the Electoral System's Impact.”. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties, 16, no. 1, 37–54.
17.
KavanaghDennis and CowleyPhilip (2010). The British General Election of 2010. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
KnutsenCarl Henrik (2011). “Which Democracies Prosper? Electoral Rules, Form of Government and Economic Growth.”. Electoral Studies, 30, no. 1 (March), 83–90.
19.
Labour Party (1997). New Labour: Because Britain Deserves Better. London: Labour Party.
20.
Labour Party (2010). The Labour Party Manifesto 2010: A Future Fair for All. London: Labour Party.
21.
LeDucLawrence (2002). “Referendums and Elections: How Do Campaigns Differ?” In FarrellDavid M. and Schmitt-BeckRüdiger (eds.), Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London: Routledge, pp. 145–62.
22.
Liberal Democrats (2010). Liberal Democrat Manifesto 2010. London: Liberal Democrats.
23.
NohlenDieter (1984). “Changes and Choices in Electoral Systems.” In LijphartArend and GrofmanBernard (eds.), Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives. Westport, CT: Praeger, 217–24.
24.
PerssonTorsten and TabelliniGuido (2005). The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
QvortrupMatt (2012). “Voting on Electoral Reform: A Comparative Perspective on the Alternative Vote Referendum in the United Kingdom.”. Political Quarterly, 83, no. 1 (January–March), 108–16.
26.
RenwickAlan (2010). The Politics of Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
RenwickAlan (2011a). A Citizen's Guide to Electoral Reform. London: Biteback.
28.
RenwickAlan (2011b). The Alternative Vote: A Briefing Paper. London: Political Studies Association.
29.
RenwickAlan and LambMichael (2013). “The Quality of Referendum Debate: The UK's Electoral System Referendum in the Print Media.”. Electoral Studies, 32, no. 2 (June), 294–304.
30.
RenwickAlan, LambMichael, and NumanBerna (2011). “The Expenses Scandal and the Politics of Electoral Reform.”. Political Quarterly, 82, no. 1 (January–March), 32–41.
31.
RenwickAlan and PiletJean-Benoit (2016). Faces on the Ballot: The Personalization of Electoral Systems in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
RikerWilliam H. (1982). “The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.”. American Political Science Review, 76, no. 4 (December), 753–66.
33.
SandersDavid, ClarkeHarold D., StewartMarianne C., and WhiteleyPaul (2011). “Simulating the Effects of the Alternative Vote in the 2010 UK General Election.”. Parliamentary Affairs, 64, no. 1 (January), 5–23.
VowlesJack (2013). “Campaign Claims, Partisan Cues, and Media Effects in the 2011 British Electoral System Referendum.”. Electoral Studies, 32, no. 2 (June), 253–64.
