This article investigates the impact of the Third Evaluation Round of the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) on party finance laws in 18 Northern, Western, and Southern European states. It particularly focuses on the transparency stipulations regarding political parties' annual accounts. Five indicators are analyzed: (1) the obligation of parties to submit their accounts, (2) the availability of a standardized form, (3) the obligation to make the accounts public, (4) the independence of the auditor, and (5) the independence of the monitoring body. On the basis of this analysis, a global transparency score is calculated, allowing us to assess the impact of GRECO. Our study shows that GRECO had a significant impact: the legal frameworks of a large number of countries have been amended, in the sense that the level of transparency regarding the parties' accounts has considerably improved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CliftBen and FisherJustin. 2004. “Comparative Party Finance Reform. The Cases of France and Britain.” Party Politics, 10(6): 677–699.
2.
Ministers Council of Europe Committee of. 2003. Recommendation Rec(2003)4 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Common Rules against Corruption in the Funding of Political Parties and Electoral Campaigns. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
3.
De SousaLuís. 2005. “Challenges to Political Financing Regulation. Sound External Monitoring/Enforcement and Sensible Internal Party Accountability.” Policy and Governance Discussion Papers No. 05-12. Canberra: Australian National University.
4.
De SousaLuís. 2005. 2014. “New Challenges to Political Party Financial Supervision in Portugal.” South European Society and Politics, 19(1): 113–134.
5.
DoubletYves-Marie. 2011. Fighting Corruption: Political Funding. Thematic Review of GRECO's Third Evaluation Round. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
6.
EwingKeith, RowbottomJacob, and Joo-CheongTham (eds.). 2012. The Funding of Political Parties: Where Now?. Oxon: Routledge.
7.
FalgueraElin, JonesSamuel, and MagnusOhman (eds.). 2014. Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns. A Handbook on Political Finance. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
8.
GaujaAnika. 2016. “The Legal Regulation of Political Parties: Is There a Global Normative Standard?” Election Law Journal, 15(1): 4–19.
9.
JohnstonRonald. 1987. Money and Votes: Constituency Campaign Spending and Election Results. London: Croom Helm.
10.
JohnstonRonald and PattieCharles. 2007. “Funding Local Political Parties in England and Wales: Donations and Constituency Campaigns.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(3): 365–395.
11.
KooleRuud. 2014. “Dilemmas of Regulating Political Finance, with Special Reference to the Dutch Case.” In Regulating Political Parties. European Democracies in Comparative Perspective, eds. van BiezenIngrid, and ten NapelHans-Martien, 45–69. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
12.
MendilowJonathan (ed.). 2012. Money, Corruption, and Electoral Competition in Established and Emerging Democracies. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
13.
MolenaarFransje. 2010. “The Development of European Standards on Political Parties and their Regulation.” Working Paper Series on the Legal Regulation of Political Parties No. 4. Leiden: Leiden University.
14.
NassmacherKarl-Heinz. 2006. “Regulation of Party Finance.” In Handbook of Party Politics, eds. KatzRichard, and CrottyWilliam, 446–455. London: Sage Publications.
15.
NassmacherKarl-Heinz. 2009. The Funding of Party Competition. Political Finance in 25 Democracies. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
16.
OhmanMagnus. 2012. Political Finance Regulations Around the World: An Overview of the International IDEA Database. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
17.
OhmanMagnus. 2014. How to Study the Impact of Political Finance Regulations. Paper presented at the World Congress of the International Political Science Association, July19–24, 2014, Montréal.
PiccioDaniela. 2014a. “Northern, Western and Southern Europe.” In Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns. A Handbook on Political Finance, eds. FalgueraElin, JonesSamuel, and OhmanMagnus, 206–252. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
20.
PiccioDaniela. 2014b. “A Self-interested Legislator? Party Regulation in Italy.” South European Society and Politics, 19(1): 1–18.
21.
RauWolfgang. 2011. “The Group of States against Corruption (GRECO)—Operation and Results from its Current Third Evaluation Round.” In Korruptionsbekämpfung als globale Herausforderung. Beiträge aus Praxis und Wissenschaft, eds. AchathalerLukas, HofmannDomenica, and PázmándyMatthias, 19–36. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
22.
ScarrowSusan. 2007. “Political Finance in Comparative Perspective.” Annual Review of Political Science, 10: 193–210.
23.
ScarrowSusan. 2011. Carrots and Sticks, Chickens and Eggs: Understanding Variations in Party Finance Regulatory Regimes. Paper presented at the IPSA-ECPR Joint Conference, February16–19, 2011, São Paolo.
24.
SmilovDaniel and JurijToplak (eds.). 2007. Political Finance and Corruption in Eastern Europe. The Transition Period. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.
25.
Van BiezenIngrid. 2008. “State Intervention in Party Politics. The Public Funding and Regulation of Political Parties.” European Review, 16(3): 701–722.
26.
Van BiezenIngrid and MolenaarFransje. 2012. “The Europeanisation of Party Politics? Competing Regulatory Paradigms at the Supranational Level.” West European Politics, 35(3): 632–656.
27.
Van BiezenIngrid and PetrKopecký. 2007. “The State and the Parties. Public Funding, Public Regulation and Rent-Seeking in Contemporary Democracies.” Party Politics, 13(2): 235–254.
28.
Venice Commission. 2011. Guidelines on Political Party Regulation. Warsaw: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.
29.
WaleckiMarcin. 2007a. “Political Finance.” In Challenging the Norms and Standards of Election Administration, ed. International Foundation for Electoral Systems, 75–93. Washington, D.C.: International Foundation for Electoral Systems.
30.
WaleckiMarcin. 2007b. “The Europeanization of Political Parties. Influencing the Regulations on Political Finance.” EUI Working Papers MWP No. 2007/29. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.
31.
GRECO reports, quoted in the text:
32.
Group of States against Corruption. 2007. Evaluation Report on Finland on Transparency of Party Funding (GRECO Eval III Rep [2007] 2E), Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
33.
Group of States against Corruption. 2008. Evaluation Report on the Netherlands on “Transparency of Party Funding” (GRECO Eval III Rep [2007] 8E), Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
34.
Group of States against Corruption. 2009. Evaluation Report on Denmark on Transparency of Party Funding (GRECO Eval III Rep [2008] 9E), Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
35.
Group of States against Corruption. 2011. Evaluation Report on Austria: Transparency of Party Funding (GRECO Eval III Rep [2011] 3E), Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
36.
Group of States against Corruption. 2012. Evaluation Report on Italy: Transparency of Party Funding (GRECO Eval III Rep [2011] 7E), Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
