In 2012, Chile passed a major election law reform to adopt automatic registration and voluntary voting. Prior to this, Chile, like most Latin American countries, had a compulsory voting law. With this reform, Chile became one of only a few countries to ever move from compulsory to voluntary voting. Since the new law came into effect, two elections have taken place. The purpose of this research note is to review registration and turnout patterns in comparative historical terms, discuss the pros and cons of the election law reform, and to evaluate the 2012 and 2013 election outcomes with respect to voter turnout and election results. We describe the background of voter registration and turnout under the old system; discuss the debate surrounding the election law reform; and review the impact of the reform on turnout patterns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnesTiffany D., and RangelGabriela. 2014. “Subnational Patterns of Participation: Compulsory Voting and the Conditional Impact of Institutional Design.” Working Paper.
2.
BlaisAndré. 2000. To Vote or Not to Vote?: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. University of Pittsburgh Press: Pittsburgh.
3.
BlaisAndré, and CartyK. 1990. “Does Proportional Representation Foster Voter Turnout?” European Journal of Political Research, 18(2) 167–181.
4.
BlaisAndré, and DobrzynskaAgnieska. 1998. “Turnout in Electoral Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research, 33(2), 239–261.
5.
BlaisAndré, MassicotteLouis, Agnieska Dobrzynska. 2003. Why is Turnout Higher in Some Countries than in Others?. Ottawa: Elections Canada.
6.
BrockingtonDavid. 2004. “The Paradox of Proportional Representation: The Effect of Party Systems and Coalitions on Individuals' Electoral Participation.” Political Studies, 52(3), 469–490.
7.
BrownRobert. D., and JustinWedeking. 2006. “People Who Have Their Tickets But Do Not Use Them: ‘Motor Voter,’ Registration, and Turnout Revisited.” American Politics Research, 34(4), 479–504.
8.
BurdenBarry C., CanonDavid T., MayerKenneth R., and MoynihanDonald P.. Forthcoming. “Election Laws, Mobilization, and Turnout: The Unanticipated Consequences of Election Reform.” American Journal of Political Science.
FournierPatrick, NadeauRichard, BlaisAndré, GidengilElisabeth, and NevitteNeil. 2004. “Time-of-Voting Decision and Susceptibility to Campaign Effects.” Electoral Studies, 23(4), 661–681.
14.
FranklinMark. 1996. “Electoral Participation in Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective.” In Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, edited by LawrenceLeDuc, RichardNiemi, and PippaNorris. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
FranklinMark. 2004. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FornosCarolina, PowerTimothy J., and GarandJames C.2004. “Explaining Voter Turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000.” Comparative Political Studies, 37(8), 909–940.
17.
GeysBenny. 2006. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-level Research. Electoral Studies, 25(4), 637–663.
18.
GimpelJames G., and SchuknechtJason E.2003. “Political Participation and the Accessibility of the Ballot Box. Political Geography, 22(4), 471–88.
19.
GimpelJames, DickJoshua J., and ShawDaron R.2007. “Election-year Stimuli and the Timing of Voter Registration.” Party Politics, 13(3), 351–374.
20.
GratschewMaria. 2004. “Compulsory Voting in Western Europe.” In Voter Turnout in Western Europe. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). Available at <http://www.idea.int/publications/voter_turnout_weurope/>.
21.
HaspelMoshe, and KnottsH. Gibbs. 2005. “Location, Location, Location: Precinct Placement and the Costs of Voting. Journal of Politics, 67(2), 560–73.
22.
HuneeusCarlos. 2005. “Chile: A System Frozen by Elite Interests.” In Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook, edited by AndrewReynolds, BenReilly, and AndrewEllis. Stockholm, Sweden: International IDEA.
INJUV. 2012. “Disposición y Actitudes Hacia el Sistema de Representación Política.” Ministerio de Desarollo Social.
25.
INJUV. 2013. “Conocimiento y Participación en Primarias Presidenciales.” Ministerio de Desarollo Social.
26.
IrwinGalen. 1974. “Compulsory Voting Legislation: Impact on Voter Turnout in the Netherlands.” Comparative Political Studies, 7(3): 292–315.
27.
JackmanRobert W.1987. “Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies.” American Political Science Review, 81, 405–424.
28.
KelleyStanleyJr., AyresRichard E., and BowenWilliam G.1967. “Registration and Voting: Putting First Things First. American Political Science Review, 61(2), 359–379.
29.
LijphartArend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma.” American Political Science Review, 91(1), 1–14.
30.
MalkopoulouAnthoula. 2009. “Lost Voters: Participation in EU Elections and the Case for Compulsory Voting.” Center for European Policy Studies.
31.
MercoPress. 2012a. “First Voluntary Vote at Municipal Elections in Chile; Fears of a Low Turnout.” MercoPress South Atlantic News Agency. October26, 2012.
32.
MercoPress. 2012b. “Chilean Municipal Elections Are Anticipating a Return of the Left Wing Coalition.” MercoPress South Atlantic News Agency. October31, 2012.
Observatorio Político-Electoral. 2013. Los Ricos También Votan. Participatión Electoral Según Nivel Socioeconómico de las Comunas en la Región Metropolitana. Santiago, Chile: Universidad Diego Portales.
35.
PanagopoulosCostas. 2008. The Calculus of Voting in Compulsory Voting Systems.” Political Behavior, 30(4), 455–467.
36.
PereaEva. A.2002. “Individual Characteristics, Institutional Incentives and Electoral Abstention in Western Europe.” European Journal of Political Research, 41(5), 643–673.
37.
PowellG. BinghamJr., 1986. “American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review, 80(1), 17–43.
38.
RosenstoneSteven J., and WolfingerRaymond E.1978. “The Effect of Registration Laws on Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review, 72(1), 22–45.
