In this article we use the results of a field experiment to investigate whether the choice to convert to permanent vote-by-mail (PVBM) status is driven primarily by individual voters' characteristics—such as a registrant's propensity to vote—or the messages elections administrators and advocates use to convince them to change their status. We find two significant outcomes. First, regardless of the message received, high-propensity voters are much more likely to convert than are low-propensity voters. Second, among low-propensity voters the convenience-based message was the least likely to cause conversion to PVBM status, and none of the messages had a significant effect among high-propensity and prior-PVBM registrants. Taken together, these results suggest that the current focus by scholars and practitioners on VBM's impact on the costs of voting may be misplaced.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArceneauxKevin, NickersonDavid W.2009. “Who Is Mobilized to Vote? A Re-Analysis of 11 Field Experiments.”American Journal of Political Science, 53,1:1–16.
2.
BarettoMatt A., StrebMatthew J., MarksMara, GuerraFernando. 2006. “Do Absentee Voters Differ from Poling Place Voters? New Evidence from California.”Public Opinion Quarterly, 70,2:224–34.
3.
BenedettiRobert. 2012. More Votes the Count: A Case Study in Voter Mobilization. Berkeley: Berkeley Public Policy Press.
4.
BergmanElizabeth, YatesPhilip A.2011. “Changing Election Methods: How Does Mandated Vote-by-Mail Affect Individual Registrants?”Election Law Journal, 10,2:115–27.
5.
BerinskyAdam J., BurnsNancy, TraugottMichael W.2001. “Who Votes By Mail? A Dynamic Model of the Individual-level Consequences of Voting-By-Mail Systems.”Public Opinion Quarterly, 65,2:178–97.
CemenskaNathan, LeighleyJan E., NaglerJonathan, TokajiDaniel P.2009. Report on the 1972–2008 Early and Absentee Voting Dataset. Report for the Pew Center on the States.
8.
CucitiPeggy, WallisAllan. 2011. Changing the Way Colorado Votes: A Study of Selected Reforms. Report to the Best Practices and Vision Commission, Office of the Colorado Secretary of State.
9.
DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
10.
DubinJeffrey A., KalsowGretchen A.1996. “Comparing Absentee and Precinct Voters: A View over Time.”Political Behavior, 18,4:369–92.
11.
EdlinAaron, GelmanAndrew, KaplanNoah. 2007. “Voting as a Rational Choice: Why and How People Vote to Improve the Well-Being of Others.”Rationality and Society, 19,3:293–314.
12.
FitzgeraldMary. 2005. “Greater Convenience But Not Greater Turnout: The Impact of Alternative Voting Methods on Electoral Participation in the United States.”American Politics Research, 33,6:842–67.
13.
FowlerJames H.2006. “Habitual Voting and Behavioral Turnout.”Journal of Politics, 68,2:335–44.
14.
GainesBrian J., KuklinskiJames H., QuirkPaul J.2007. “The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined.”Political Analysis, 15,1:1–20.
15.
GerberAlan S., GreenDonald P., LarimerChristopher W.2008. “Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence From a Large-Scale Field Experiment.”American Political Science Review, 102:33–48.
16.
GerberAlan S., GreenDonald P., ShacharRon. 2003. “Voting May Be Habit-Forming: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment.”American Journal of Political Science, 47,3:540–50.
17.
GerberAlan S., RogersTodd. 2009. “Descriptive Social Norms and Motivation to Vote: Everybody's Doing It and so Should You.”Journal of Politics, 71,1:178–91.
18.
GreenDonald P., ShacharRon. 2000. “Habit Formation and Political Behavior: Evidence of Consuetude in Voter Turnout.”British Journal of Political Science, 30,4:561–73.
19.
GronkePaul, Galanes-RosenbaumEva, MillerPeter A., ToffeyDaniel. 2008. “Convenience Voting.”Annual Review of Political Science, 11:437–55.
20.
HanmerMichael, TraugottMichael. 2004. “The Impact of Voting by Mail on Voter Behavior.”American Politics Research, 32,4:375–405.
21.
HightonBenjamin. 2004. “Voter Registration and Turnout in the United States.”Perspectives on Politics, 2,3:507–15.
22.
KarpJeffrey, BanducciSusan. 2001. “Going Postal: How All Mail Elections Influence Turnout.”Political Behavior, 22,3:223–39.
23.
KousserThad, MullinMegan. 2007. “Does Voting by Mail Increase Participation? Using Matching to Analyze a Natural Experiment.”Political Analysis, 15,4:428–45.
24.
MannChristopher, SondheimerRachel M.2009. The Role of Local Elections Officials in Promoting Growth of Mail Voting; Colorado. Report for the Pew Center on the States.
25.
MonroeNathan W., SylvesterDari E.2011. “Who Converts to Vote-By-Mail? Evidence From a Field Experiment.”Election Law Journal, 10,1:15–35.
OliverJ. Eric. 1996. “The Effects of Eligibility Restrictions and Party Activity on Absentee Voting and Overall Turnout.”American Journal of Political Science, 40,2:498–513.
28.
PattersonSamuel C., CaldeiraGregory A.1985. “Mailing in the Vote: Correlates and Consequences of Absentee Voting.”American Journal of Political Science, 29,4:766–88.
29.
RikerWilliam H., OrdeshookPeter C.1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.”American Political Science Review, 62,1:25–42.
30.
RosenstoneSteven J., HansenJohn Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
31.
SouthwellPatricia. 2004. “Five Years Later: A Re-assessment of Oregon's Vote by Mail Electoral Process.”PS: Political Science & Politics, 37,1:89–93.
32.
SouthwellPriscilla L., JustinBurchett. 2000. “The Effect of All-Mail Elections on Voter Turnout.”American Politics Quarterly, 28,1:72–9.
33.
SteinRobert M.1998. “Early Voting.”The Public Opinion Quarterly, 62,1:57–69.
34.
SteinRobert M., VonnahmeGreg. 2008. “Engaging the Unengaged Voter: Vote Centers and Voter Turnout.”Journal of Politics, 70,2:487–97.
35.
SteinRobert M., GregVonnahme. 2011. “Voting at Non-Precinct Polling Places: A Review and Research Agenda.”Election Law Journal, 10,3:307–311.
36.
StewartCharlesIII. 2011. “Adding up the Costs and Benefits of Voting by Mail.”Election Law Journal, 10,3:297–301.
37.
UhlanerCarole J.1989. “Rational Turnout: The Neglected Role of Groups.”American Journal of Political Science, 33,2:390–422.
38.
VerbaSidney, SchlozmanKen Lehman, BradyHenry. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
