Abstract
Abstract
When states consider adopting new election laws, policy makers often take into account public opinion and the financial costs of reforms but not the receptivity of those most responsible for implementation. Implementation theory suggests that the potential success of a new law depends on the motivation and ability of local election officials to administer it. To examine these attitudes, we conducted face-to-face interviews with an extensive survey of municipal election officials in Wisconsin. The responses show a significant bias in favor of the status quo, with election clerks generally supporting existing practices (Election Day registration) but opposing new proposals (early voting). Election officials are more likely to believe that Election Day registration is a right and increases turnout compared to early voting, and that early voting would increase their workload compared to Election Day registration. Multivariate analysis demonstrates that resistance to early voting is not merely a reflection of insufficient resources but is also a philosophical stance that reflects clerks' beliefs about the importance of voting on Election Day as a civic responsibility. We conclude by discussing the broader implications of this research for future innovations and reforms in election administration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
