The stability of calcium alginate beads for microalgae immobilization in wastewater treatment has been a concern due to the potential exchange of Ca2+ ions from the bead surface with the environment. To overcome this constraint, adding biopolymers might improve the properties of alginate gel. The purpose of the study is to immobilize Chlorella vulgaris in blends of sodium alginate with carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) or pectin in different concentrations (1%, 1.5%, and 2%) to evaluate the microalgae growth and nutrient removal from culture media. The microalgae growth was assessed by cell counting and chlorophyll content using a fluorescent excitation–emission matrix. Nutrient removal was conducted by measuring the phosphate and nitrate concentration using ion chromatography. The characterization of beads, such as size, shrinkage degree, swelling ratio, water content, and dry weight, was also investigated. Compared to alginate-only beads, the results present better performance for cell growth and, similarly, for removing nutrients in the presence of pectin and CMC blends. Microalgae in alginate with 1.0% of pectin grew 26% more than in alginate-only beads on day 8. The blends with CMC showed faster removal of nutrients compared to pectin blends and alginate-only in only 3 days. For phosphate, the highest removal was by immobilized microalgae of 95% for 2.0% of CMC and 86% for 2.0% of pectin. For nitrate, the immobilized microalgae removed 100% in 1.0% and 1.5% of CMC and 98% in 1.0% of pectin.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abu SepianNR, Mat YasinNH, ZainolN, et al.Fatty acid profile from immobilised Chlorella vulgaris cells in different matrices. Environ Technol, 2019; 40(9):1110–1117; doi: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1408691
2.
BajpaiSK, SharmaS. Investigation of swelling/degradation behaviour of alginate beads crosslinked with Ca2+ and Ba2+ ions. React Funct Polym, 2004; 59(2):129–140; doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2004.01.002
3.
BanerjeeS, TiwadePB, SambhavK, et al.Effect of alginate concentration in wastewater nutrient removal using alginate-immobilised microalgae beads: Uptake kinetics and adsorption studies. Biochem Eng J, 2019; 149:107241; doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2019.107241
4.
CaoL, LuW, MataA, et al.Egg-box model-based gelation of alginate and pectin: A review. Carbohydr Polym, 2020; 242:116389; doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116389
5.
ChingSH, BansalN, BhandariB. Alginate gel particles–A review of production techniques and physical properties. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2017; 57(6):1133–1152; doi: 10.1080/10408398.2014.965773
6.
CovarrubiasSA, De-BashanLE, MorenoM, et al.Alginate beads provide a beneficial physical barrier against native microorganisms in wastewater treated with immobilised bacteria and microalgae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2012; 93(6):2669–2680; doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3585-8
7.
CruzI, BashanY, Hernàndez-CarmonaG, et al.Biological deterioration of alginate beads containing immobilised microalgae and bacteria during tertiary wastewater treatment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2013; 97(22):9847–9858; doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-4703-6
8.
da Silva FerreiraV, Sant’AnnaC. Impact of culture conditions on the chlorophyll content of microalgae for biotechnological applications. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2017; 33(1)–8; doi: 10.1007/s11274-016-2181-6
9.
DaneshvarE, SanthoshC, AntikainenE, et al.Microalgal growth and nitrate removal efficiency in different cultivation conditions: Effect of macro and micronutrients and salinity. J Environ Chem Eng, 2018; 6(2):1848–1854; doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.02.033
10.
Davidovich-PinhasM, Bianco-PeledH. A quantitative analysis of alginate swelling. Carbohydr Polym, 2009; 79(4):1020–1027; doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.036
11.
ElsayedY, LekakouC, TomlinsP. Monitoring and modelling of oxygen transport through un-crosslinked and crosslinked gelatine gels. Polym Test, 2014; 40:106–115; doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.08.016
12.
FaafengBA, van DonkE, KällqvistST. In situ measurement of algal growth potential in aquatic ecosystems by immobilised algae. J Appl Phycol, 1994; 6(3):301–308; doi: 10.1007/BF02181943
13.
GasperiniL, ManoJF, ReisRL. Natural polymers for the microencapsulation of cells. J R Soc Interface, 2014; 11(100):20140817–20140817; doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0817
14.
HamblyAC, HendersonRK, BakerA, et al.Fluorescence monitoring for cross-connection detection in water reuse systems: Australian case studies. Water Sci Technol, 2010; 61(1):155–162; doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.795
15.
JawaheerS, WhiteSF, RughooputhSDDV, et al.Enzyme stabilisation using pectin as a novel entrapment matrix in biosensors. Anal Lett, 2002; 35(13):2077–2091; doi: 10.1081/AL-120014997
16.
KubeM, JeffersonB, FanL, et al.The impact of wastewater characteristics, algal species selection and immobilisation on simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Algal Res, 2018; 31:478–488; doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2018.01.009
17.
KubeM, MohseniA, FanL, et al.Impact of alginate selection for wastewater treatment by immobilised Chlorella vulgaris. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019; 358:1601–1609; doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.065
18.
LauPS, TamNFY, WongYS. Wastewater nutrients (N and P) removal by carrageenan and alginate immobilized Chlorella Vulgaris. Environ Technol, 1997; 18(9):945–951; doi: 10.1080/09593331808616614
19.
LeeH, JeongD, ImSJ, et al.Optimisation of alginate bead size immobilised with Chlorella vulgaris and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii for nutrient removal. Bioresour Technol, 2020; 302:122891; doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122891
20.
LeeBB, RavindraP, ChanES. Size and shape of calcium alginate beads produced by extrusion dripping. Chem Eng & Technol, 2013; 36(10):1627–1642; doi: 10.1002/ceat.201300230
21.
LiL, ChenY, WangY, et al.Effects of concentration variation on the physical properties of alginate-based substrates and cell behavior in culture. Int J Biol Macromol, 2019; 128:184–195; doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.123
22.
MattoM, HusainQ. Entrapment of porous and stable concanavalin A–peroxidase complex into hybrid calcium alginate–pectin gel. J of Chemical Tech Biotech, 2006; 81(7):1316–1323; doi: 10.1002/jctb.1540
23.
MobergL, RobertssonG, KarlbergB. Spectrofluorimetric determination of chlorophylls and pheopigments using parallel factor analysis. Talanta, 2001; 54(1):161–170; doi: 10.1016/S0039-9140(00)00650-0
24.
MohseniA, KubeM, FanL, et al.Treatment of wastewater reverse osmosis concentrate using alginate-immobilised microalgae: Integrated impact of solution conditions on algal bead performance. Chemosphere, 2021; 276:130028; doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2021.130028
25.
MoreiraSM, Moreira-SantosM, GuilherminoL, et al.Immobilisation of the marine microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum in alginate for in situ experiments: Bead stability and suitability. Enzyme Microb Technol, 2006; 38(1–2):135–141; doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.05.005
26.
OmarH, RohaniS. Treatment of landfill waste, leachate and landfill gas: A review. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2015; 9(1):15–32; doi: 10.1007/s11705-015-1501-y
27.
PeñaE, Peña-VázquezP, ManeiroE, et al.Microalgae fiber optic biosensors for herbicide monitoring using sol-gel technology. Biosens Bioelectron, 2009; 24(12):3538–3543; doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.05.013
28.
RenH, GaoZ, WuD, et al.Efficient Pb(II) removal using sodium alginate–carboxymethyl cellulose gel beads: Preparation, characterisation, and adsorption mechanism. Carbohydr Polym, 2016; 137:402–409; doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.002
29.
RiddleKW, MooneyDJ, ArborHHDA, et al.Biomaterials for cell immobilisation, In: Fundamentals of Cell Immobilisation Biotechnology, Focus on Biotechnology. (NedovićV., WillaertR. Eds.). Springer. Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2004; pp. 734–763.
30.
Ruiz-MarinA, Mendoza-EspinosaLG, StephensonT. Growth and nutrient removal in free and immobilised green algae in batch and semi-continuous cultures treating real wastewater. Bioresour Technol, 2009; 101(1):58–64; doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.076
31.
SantagapitaPR, MazzobreMF, BueraMdP. Invertase stability in alginate beads. In: Effect of Trehalose and Chitosan Inclusion and of Drying Methods. Food Research International. 2012; 47, 321–330. 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.07.042
32.
TeixeiraVFT, PereiraNR, WaldmanWR, et al.Ion exchange kinetics of magnetic alginate ferrogel beads produced by external gelation. Carbohydr Polym, 2014; 111:198–205; doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.009
33.
TraviesoL, BenitezF, WeilandP, et al.Experiments on immobilisation of microalgae for nutrient removal in wastewater treatments. Bioresour Technol, 1996; 55(3):181–186; doi: 10.1016/0960-8524(95)00196-4
34.
VargasPO, PereiraNR, GuimarãesAO, et al.Shrinkage and deformation during convective drying of calcium alginate. LWT, 2018; 97:213–222; doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.06.056
35.
VooWP, RavindraP, TeyBT, et al.Comparison of alginate and pectin based beads for production of poultry probiotic cells. J Biosci Bioeng, 2011; 111(3):294–299; doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.11.010
36.
WangP, LiZ, BaiJ, et al.Optimisation of microalgal bead preparation with Scenedesmus obliquus for both nutrient removal and lipid production. Ecol Eng, 2016; 92:236–242; doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.04.009
YanGA, YuJY. Comparison of the effects of nitrogen concentration on nutrient removal, growth and physiological characteristics of immobilised and free Chlorella vulgaris: I. Growth and nutrient removal. Toxicol Environ Chem, 1997; 58(1–4):63–74; doi: 10.1080/02772249709358398
39.
ZamaniN, NoshadiM, AminS, et al.Effect of alginate structure and microalgae immobilisation method on orthophosphate removal from wastewater. J Appl Phycol, 2012; 24(4):649–656; doi: 10.1007/s10811-011-9682-3
40.
ZhangE, WangB, NingS, et al.Ammonia-nitrogen and orthophosphate removal by immobilised Chlorella sp. isolated from municipal wastewater for potential use in tertiary treatment. Afr J Biotechnol, 2012; 11:6529–6534; doi: 10.5897/AJB11.4281
