Sulfur-modified biochar was prepared and used to efficiently remove Chromium (Cr) from water. It was found that the sulfur-modified biochar prepared from lower primary pyrolysis temperature (<400°C), higher secondary pyrolysis temperature (>400°C), appropriate secondary pyrolysis time, and S/C ratio was favorable for Cr removal. According to the response surface methodology analysis, the biochar prepared under the primary pyrolysis temperature of 350°C, secondary pyrolysis temperature of 450°C, secondary pyrolysis time of 60 min, and S/C ratio of 2:1 could achieve the maximum Cr removal (92%). The S-modified biochar prepared under the optimum condition exhibited greater capacity of adsorbing Cr(VI) or reducing Cr(VI) into Cr(III) compared with the biochar without the S modification. The enhanced Cr(VI) adsorption and reduction were likely because some of the sulfur-containing groups formed on the modified biochar could bind and interact with the Cr(VI). Besides, the enhanced surface area by the sulfur modification also played a role in prompting the removal and reduction of Cr(VI).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AfshinS, RashtbariY, VosoughM, et al.Application of Box-Behnken design for optimizing parameters of hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solutions using Fe3O4 loaded on activated carbon prepared from alga: Kinetics and equilibrium study. J Water Process Eng, 2021; 42:102113; doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102113
2.
AmbikaS, KumarM, PisharodyL, et al.Modified biochar as a green adsorbent for removal of hexavalent chromium from various environmental matrices: Mechanisms, methods, and prospects. Chem Eng J, 2022; 439:135716; doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135716
3.
Ben KhalifaE, AzaiezS, MagnaccaG, et al.Synthesis and characterization of promising biochars for hexavalent chromium removal: Application of response surface methodology approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol, 2022; 20:4111–4126; doi: 10.1007/s13762-022-04270-0
4.
DiezB, RoldanN, MartinA, et al.Fouling and biofouling resistance of metal-doped mesostructured silica/polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci, 2017; 526:252–263; doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.051
5.
EssidN, GharbiR, HarrathAH, et al.Toxicity of a chromium-enriched superfood, Spirulina platensis, assessed by taxonomic and morpho-functional diversity of marine meiofauna. Environ Pollut, 2020; 262:114350; doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114350
6.
FanJJ, CaiC, ChiHF, et al.Remediation of cadmium and lead polluted soil using thiol-modified biochar. J Hazard Mater, 2020; 388:122037; doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122037
7.
FangJ, GuZM, GangDC, et al.Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution by activated carbon coated with quaternized poly(4-vinylpyridine). Environ Sci Technol, 2007; 41(13):4748–4753; doi: 10.1021/es061969b
8.
GaikwadMS, BalomajumderC. Tea waste biomass activated carbon electrode for simultaneous removal of Cr(VI) and fluoride by capacitive deionization. Chemosphere, 2017; 184:1141–1149; doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.074
9.
GallinoS, BullozM, NaffrechouxE, et al.The influence of extraction rate on the reduced sulphur content of Aix-les-Bains' thermal spring waters: Consequences for resource-quality monitoring. Appl Geochem, 2008; 23(6):1367–1382; doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.11.014
10.
GaoJ, HanDQ, XuY, et al.Persulfate activation by sulfide-modified nanoscale iron supported by biochar (S-nZVI/BC) for degradation of ciprofloxacin. Sep Purif Technol, 2020; 235:116202; doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116202
11.
GuoDM, AnQD, XiaoZY, et al.Efficient removal of Pb(II), Cr(VI) and organic dyes by polydopamine modified chitosan aerogels. Carbohyd Polym, 2018; 202:306–314; doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.140
12.
HongQF, LiuC, WangZB, et al.Electron transfer enhancing Fe(II)/Fe(III) cycle by sulfur and biochar in magnetic FeS@biochar to active peroxymonosulfate for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid degradation. Chem Eng J, 2021; 417:129238; doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129238
13.
HouJL, MaY, LiSY, et al.Transformation of sulfur and nitrogen during Shenmu coal pyrolysis. Fuel, 2018; 231:134–144; doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.046
14.
HsiHC, RoodMJ, Rostam-AbadiM, et al.Mercury adsorption properties of sulfur-impregnated adsorbents. J Environ Eng, 2002; 128(11):10801089; doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2002)128:11(1080)
15.
HuangSZ, LiangQW, GengJJ, et al.Sulfurized biochar prepared by simplified technic with superior adsorption property towards aqueous Hg(II) and adsorption mechanisms. Mater Chem Phys, 2019; 238:121919; doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121919
16.
JeonC, SolisKL, AnHR, et al.Sustainable removal of Hg(II) by sulfur-modified pine-needle biochar. J Hazard Mater, 2020; 388:122048; doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122048
17.
JohnsonDW, HendersonGS. Sulfate adsorption and sulfur fractions in a highly weathered soil under a mixed deciduous forest. Soil Sci, 1979; 128(1):34–40; doi: 10.1097/00010694-197907000-00006
18.
KorpielJA, VidicRD. Effect of sulfur impregnation method on activated carbon uptake of gas-phase mercury. Environ Sci Technol, 1997; 31(8):2319–2325; doi: 10.1021/es9609260
19.
LandersDH, DavidMB, MitchellMJ. Analysis of organic and inorganic sulfur constituents in sediments, soils and water. Inter J Environ Anal Chem, 1983; 14(4):245–256; doi: 10.1080/03067318308071623
20.
LeiZM, AnQD, FanY, et al.Monolithic magnetic carbonaceous beads for efficient Cr(VI) removal from water. New J Chem, 2016; 40(2):1195–1204; doi: 10.1039/c5nj02210j
21.
LeiZM, ZhaiSR, LvJL, et al.Sodium alginate-based magnetic carbonaceous biosorbents for highly efficient Cr(VI) removal from water. RSC Adv, 2015; 5(95):77932–77941; doi: 10.1039/c5ra13226f
22.
LiuN, ZhangYT, XuC, et al.Removal mechanisms of aqueous Cr(VI) using apple wood biochar: A spectroscopic study. J Hazard Mater, 2020; 384:121371; doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121371
23.
LiuWF, ZhangJ, ZhangCL, et al.Preparation and evaluation of activated carbon-based iron-containing adsorbents for enhanced Cr(VI) removal: Mechanism study. Chem Eng J, 2012; 189:295–302; doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.02.082
24.
LyuHH, TangJC, HuangY, et al.Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions by a novel biochar supported nanoscale iron sulfide composite. Chem Eng J, 2017; 322:516–524; doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.058
25.
LyuHH, ZhaoH, TangJC, et al.Immobilization of hexavalent chromium in contaminated soils using biochar supported nanoscale iron sulfide composite. Chemosphere, 2018; 194:360–369; doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.182
26.
MalaviyaP, SinghA. Bioremediation of chromium solutions and chromium containing wastewaters. Crit Rev Microbiol, 2016; 42(4):607–633; doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.02.082
27.
MuY, AiZH, ZhangLZ, et al.Insight into core-shell dependent anoxic Cr(VI) removal with Fe@Fe2O3 nanowires: Indispensable role of surface bound Fe(II). ACS Appl Mater Inter, 2015; 7(3):1997–2005; doi: 10.1021/am507815t
28.
MusahBI, PengL, XuYF. Biosorption of Cr (VI) using Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus mucilaginosus Krassilnikov: Contrastive investigation on removal performance, kinetics, and mechanisms. Environ Eng Sci, 2021; 38(4):231–244; doi: 10.1089/ees.2020.0190
29.
NriaguJO, SoonYK. Distribution and isotopic composition of sulfur in lake sediments of northern Ontario. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1985; 49(3):823–834; doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(85)90175-9
30.
PapS, BoydKG, TaggartMA, et al.Circular economy based landfill leachate treatment with sulphur-doped microporous biochar. Waste Manage, 2021; 124:160–171; doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.01.037
31.
ParkJH, WangJJ, ZhouB, et al.Removing mercury from aqueous solution using sulfurizedbiochar and associated mechanisms. Environ Pollut, 2019; 244:627–635; doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.069
32.
QiaoKL, TianWJ, BaiJ, et al.Synthesis of floatable magnetic iron/biochar beads for the removal of chromium from aqueous solutions. Environ Technol Innov, 2020; 19:100907; doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.100907
33.
RajapakshaAU, AlamMS, ChenN, et al.Removal of hexavalent chromium in aqueous solutions using biochar: Chemical and spectroscopic investigations. Sci Total Environ, 2018; 625:1567–1573; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.195
34.
RajendranM, ShiLZ, WuC, et al.Effect of sulfur and sulfur-iron modified biochar on cadmium availability and transfer in the soil-rice system. Chemosphere, 2019; 222:314–322; doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.149
35.
ReddyKSK, Al ShoaibiA, SrinivasakannanC. Elemental mercury adsorption on sulfur-impregnated porous carbon—A review. Environ Technol, 2014; 35(1):18–26; doi: 10.1080/21622515.2013.804589
36.
SeredychM, JagielloJ, BandoszTJ. Complexity of CO2 adsorption on nanoporous sulfur-doped carbons - Is surface chemistry an important factor?. Carbon, 2014; 74:207–217; doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.024
37.
ShiYY, ShanR, LuLL, et al.High-efficiency removal of Cr(VI) by modified biochar derived from glue residue. J Clean Prod, 2020; 254:119935; doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119935
38.
SongJY, HeQL, HuXL, et al.Highly efficient removal of Cr(VI) and Cu(II) by biochar derived from Artemisia argyi stem. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2019; 26(13):13221–13234; doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04863-2
39.
SongX, WangQ, JinP, et al.Enhanced biostimulation coupled with a dynamic groundwater recirculation system for Cr(VI) removal from groundwater: A field-scale study. Sci Total Environ, 2021; 772:145495; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145495
40.
TanSL, XinY, LiuK, et al.Remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated soils by washing with low-molecular-weight organic acids based on the distribution of heavy metal species. Environ Eng Sci, 2022; 39(1):64–72; doi: 10.1089/ees.2021.0018
41.
TianHR, HuangC, WangP, et al.Enhanced elimination of Cr(VI) from aqueous media by polyethyleneimine modified corn straw biochar supported sulfide nanoscale zero valent iron: Performance and mechanism. Bioresour Technol, 2023; 369:128452; doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128452
42.
WangCC, DuXD, LiJ, et al.Photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction in metal-organic frameworks: A mini-review. Appl Catal B Environ, 2016; 193:198–216; doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.04.030
43.
WangF, JinLT, GuoCN, et al.Enhanced heavy metals sorption by modified biochars derived from pig manure. Sci Total Environ, 2021; 786:147595; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147595
44.
WangY, YuL, WangRT, et al.A novel cellulose hydrogel coating with nanoscale Fe0 for Cr(VI) adsorption and reduction. Sci Total Environ, 2020a;726:138625; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138625
45.
WangYX, RaoL, WangPF, et al.Photocatalytic activity of N-TiO2/O-doped N vacancy g-C3N4 and the intermediates toxicity evaluation under tetracycline hydrochloride and Cr(VI) coexistence environment. Appl Catal B Environ, 2020b;262:118308; doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118308
46.
WuC, ShiLZ, XueSG, et al.Effect of sulfur-iron modified biochar on the available cadmium and bacterial community structure in contaminated soils. Sci Total Environ, 2019; 647:1158–1168; doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.087
47.
XiaoK, XuFY, JiangLH, et al.Resin oxidization phenomenon and its influence factor during chromium(VI) removal from wastewater using gel-type anion exchangers. Chem Eng J, 2016; 283:1349–1356; doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.084
48.
YangHR, LiSS, ShanXC, et al.Hollow polyethyleneimine/carboxymethyl cellulose beads with abundant and accessible sorption sites for ultra-efficient chromium (VI) and phosphate removal. Sep Purif Technol, 2022a;278:119607; doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119607
49.
YangHR, YangC, LiSS, et al.Site-imprinted hollow composites with integrated functions for ultra-efficient capture of hexavalent chromium from water. Sep Purif Technol, 2022b;284:120240; doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.120240
50.
YangSY, LiQ, ChenL, et al.Synergistic removal and reduction of U(VI) and Cr(VI) by Fe3S4 micro-crystal. Chem Eng J, 2020; 385:123909; doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123909
51.
ZhangHC, WangT, SuiZF, et al.Enhanced mercury removal by transplanting sulfur-containing functional groups to biochar through plasma. Fuel, 2019; 253:703–712; doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.068
52.
ZhaoL, ZhangYR, WangL, et al.Effective removal of Hg(II) and MeHg from aqueous environment by ball milling aided thiol-modification of biochars: Effect of different pyrolysis temperatures. Chemosphere, 2022; 294:133820; doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133820
53.
ZhengCJ, YangZH, SiMY, et al.Application of biochars in the remediation of chromium contamination: Fabrication, mechanisms, and interfering species. J Hazard Mater, 2021; 407:124376; doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124376
54.
ZhengW, AnQD, LeiZM, et al.Efficient batch and column removal of Cr(VI) by carbon beads with developed nano-network. RSC Adv, 2016; 6(106):104897–104910; doi: 10.1039/c6ra14070j
55.
ZhouL, LiuYG, LiuSB, et al.Investigation of the adsorption-reduction mechanisms of hexavalent chromium by ramie biochars of different pyrolytic temperatures. Bioresour Technol, 2016; 218:351–359; doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.102
56.
ZhouZJ, LiuXW, LiCP, et al.Seawater-assisted synthesis of MnCe/zeolite-13X for removing elemental mercury from coal-fired flue gas. Fuel, 2020; 262:116605; doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116605
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
