In this article, low-molecular-weight organic acids were applied to remediate the hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)]-contaminated soil. The influence of different parameters (washing concentration, solid–liquid ratio, time, and pH value) on the repair effect was explored, and the form distribution and desorption kinetic experiments of the soil were performed. The results show that the pH of eluents can significantly affect the form distribution of chromium, with the exchangeable form increasing considerably at a lower pH. The kinetics of Cr(VI) desorption can be described by the pseudo-second-order kinetics equation. The best washing scheme was determined to be the citric acid as the eluent at a concentration of 0.3 mol/L, a solid to liquid ratio of 1:10, pH 4, and a washing time of 6 h. The removal rate can be as high as 73.52%. After washing, the leaching concentration of Cr(VI) in the soil was reduced from 23.76 to 1.05 mg/L, well below the regulatory constraint of 5 mg/L. Additionally, the characterizations of X-ray diffractometer and scanning electron microscope showed little effect of adopting citric acid as a washing agent on soil structure and surface morphology. This study can provide a theoretical basis for the remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil at industrial sites.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AharoniC., LevinsonS., RavinaI., and SparksD.L. (1991). Kinetics of soil chemical reactions: Relationships between empirical equations and diffusion models. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 1307.
2.
ApteA.D., TareV., and BoseP. (2006). Extent of oxidation of Cr(III) to Cr(VI) under various conditions pertaining to natural environment. J. Hazard. Mater. 128, 164.
3.
CaoX., GuoJ., MaoJ., and LanY. (2011). Adsorption and mobility of Cr(III)-organic acid complexes in soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 192, 1533.
4.
ChenH., DouJ., and XuH. (2018). The effect of low-molecular-weight organic-acids (LMWOAs) on treatment of chromium-contaminated soils by compost-phytoremediation: Kinetics of the chromium release and fractionation. J. Environ. Sci. 70, 45.
5.
DengB., and StoneA.T. (1996). Surface-catalyzed chromium (VI) reduction: Reactivity comparisons of different organic reductants and different oxide surfaces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30, 2484.
6.
DhalB., ThatoiH.N., DasN.N., and PandeyB.D. (2013). Chemical and microbial remediation of hexavalent chromium from contaminated soil and mining/metallurgical solid waste: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 250, 272.
7.
ErtaniA., MiettoA., BorinM., and NardiS. (2017). Chromium in agricultural soils and crops: A review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 228, 190.
8.
FuL., FengA., XiaoJ., WuQ., YeQ., and PengS. (2020). Remediation of soil contaminated with high levels of hexavalent chromium by combined chemical-microbial reduction and stabilization. J. Hazard. Mater. 403, 123847.
GB/T15555.4-1995. (1995). Solid waste-determination of chromium(VI)-1,5-diphenylcarbohydrazide spectrophotometric method. China. Available at: http://www.mee.gov.cn/image20010518/1934.pdf (accessed June22, 2021).
11.
GengH., WangF., YanC., TianZ., ChenH., ZhouB., YuanR., and YaoJ. (2020). Leaching behavior of metals from iron tailings under varying pH and low-molecular-weight organic acids. J. Hazard. Mater. 383, 121136.
12.
HausladenD.M., Alexander-OzinskasA., McClainC., and FendorfS. (2018). Hexavalent chromium sources and distribution in california groundwater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 8242.
HoubenD., EvrardL., and SonnetP. (2013). Mobility, bioavailability and pH-dependent leaching of cadmium, zinc and lead in a contaminated soil amended with biochar. Chemosphere, 92, 1450.
15.
Jean-SoroL., BordasF., and BollingerJ.C. (2012). Column leaching of chromium and nickel from a contaminated soil using EDTA and citric acid. Environ. Pollut. 164, 175.
16.
JingY.D., HeZ.L., and YangX.E. (2007). Effects of pH, organic acids, and competitive cations on mercury desorption in soils. Chemosphere, 69, 1662.
17.
KumarA., GahoiP., and VermaN. (2020). Simultaneous scavenging of Cr(VI) from soil and facilitation of nutrient uptake in plant using a mixture of carbon microfibers and nanofibers. Chemosphere, 239, 124760.
18.
LiX., HeX., WangH., and LiuY. (2020). Characteristics and long-term effects of stabilized nanoscale ferrous sulfide immobilized hexavalent chromium in soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 389, 122089.
19.
LiuL., LiW., SongW., and GuoM. (2018). Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability. Sci. Total Environ. 633, 206.
20.
LiuS., GaoH., ChengR., WangY., MaX., PengC., and XieZ. (2020a). Study on influencing factors and mechanism of removal of Cr(VI) from soil suspended liquid by bentonite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron. Sci. Rep. 10, 8831.
21.
LiuW., LiJ., ZhengJ., SongY., ShiZ., LinZ., and ChaiL. (2020b). Different pathways for Cr(III) oxidation: Implications for Cr(VI) reoccurrence in reduced chromite ore processing residue. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 11971.
22.
MalekA., HachemiM., and DidierV. (2009). New approach of depollution of solid chromium leather waste by the use of organic chelates: Economical and environmental impacts. J. Hazard. Mater. 170, 156.
23.
MiretzkyP., and CirelliA.F. (2010). Cr(VI) and Cr(III) removal from aqueous solution by raw and modified lignocellulosic materials: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 180, 1.
24.
PuzonG.J., TokalaR.K., ZhangH., YongeD., PeytonB.M., and XunL. (2008). Mobility and recalcitrance of organo-chromium(III) complexes. Chemosphere, 70, 2054.
25.
QiangT., FanG., YufengG., ToruI., and TakeshiK. (2018). Desorption characteristics of Cr(III), Mn(II), and Ni(II) in contaminated soil using citric acid and citric acid-containing wastewater. Soils Found. 58, 50.
26.
SchwabA.P., ZhuD.S., and BanksM.K. (2008). Influence of organic acids on the transport of heavy metals in soil. Chemosphere, 72, 986.
TaghipourM., and JalaliM. (2013). Effect of low-molecular-weight organic acids on kinetics release and fractionation of phosphorus in some calcareous soils of western Iran. Environ. Monit. Assess. 185, 5471.
29.
TessierA.P., CampbellP.G.C., and BissonM.X. (1979). Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal. Chem. 51, 844.
30.
USEPA 3060A. (1996). Alkaline digestion for hexavalent chromium, Method 3060A. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
31.
USEPA 7196A. (1992). Chromium, hexavalent (colorimetric), Method 7196A. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
32.
WangH., FanX., WangY.N., LiW., SunY., ZhanM., and WuG. (2018). Comparative leaching of six toxic metals from raw and chemically stabilized MSWI fly ash using citric acid. J. Environ. Manage. 208, 15.
33.
WangN., ZhongY., KangC., TianT., WangY., XiaoK., and ShangD. (2019a). Effects of oxalic acid on Cr(VI) reduction by phenols in ice. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 26, 29780.
34.
WangQ., ChenJ., ZhengA., and ShiL. (2019b). Dechelation of Cd-EDTA complex and recovery of EDTA from simulated soil-washing solution with sodium sulfide. Chemosphere, 220, 1200.
35.
WangY., PengB., YangZ., ChaiL., LiaoQ., ZhangZ., and LiC. (2015). Bacterial community dynamics during bioremediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 85, 50.
36.
WuJ., LiQ., and LvZ. (2020). Regulating and intervening act of Cr chemical speciation effect on the electrokinetic removal in Cr contaminated soil in arid area. Sep. Purif. Technol. 250, 117167.
37.
WuanaR.A., OkieimenF.E., and ImborvunguJ.A. (2010). Removal of heavy metals from a contaminated soil using organic chelating acids. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 7, 485.
38.
XuT., NanF., JiangX., TangY., ZengY., ZhangW., and ShiB. (2020). Effect of soil pH on the transport, fractionation, and oxidation of chromium(III). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 195, 110459.
39.
YuanW., XuW., ZhangZ., WangX., ZhangQ., BaiJ., and WangJ. (2019). Rapid Cr(VI) reduction and immobilization in contaminated soil by mechanochemical treatment with calcium polysulfide. Chemosphere, 227, 657.
40.
ZhangH., GaoY., and XiongH. (2017). Removal of heavy metals from polluted soil using the citric acid fermentation broth: A promising washing agent. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 24, 9506.
41.
ZhangT., WangT., WangW., LiuB., LiW., and LiuY. (2020a). Reduction and stabilization of Cr(VI) in soil by using calcium polysulfide: Catalysis of natural iron oxides. Environ. Res. 190, 109992.
42.
ZhangT.-T., XueQ., and WeiM.-L. (2018). Leachability and Stability of hexavalent-chromium-contaminated soil stabilized by ferrous sulfate and calcium polysulfide. Appl. Sci. 8, 1431.
43.
ZhangZ., GuoG., ZhaoH., and WuD. (2020b). Partitioning, leachability, and speciation of chromium in the size-fractions of soil contaminated by chromate production. Chemosphere, 263, 128308.
44.
ZouQ., GaoY., YiS., JiangJ., AihemaitiA., LiD., and YangM. (2019). Multi-step column leaching using low-molecular-weight organic acids for remediating vanadium- and chromium-contaminated soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 26, 15406.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
