The chemical composition of coal ash is highly heterogeneous and dependent on the origin of the source coal, combustion parameters, and type and configuration of air pollution control devices. This heterogeneity results in uncertainty in the evaluation of leaching potential of contaminants from coal ash. The goal of this work was to identify whether a single leaching protocol could roughly group high-leaching potential coal ash from low-leaching potential coal ash, with respect to arsenic (As) and selenium (Se). We used four different leaching tests, including the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Protocol (TCLP), natural pH, aerobic sediment microcosms, and anaerobic sediment microcosms on 10 different coal ash materials, including fly ash, lime-treated ash, and flue gas desulfurization materials. Leaching tests showed promise in categorizing high and low-leaching potential ash materials, indicating that a single point test could act as a first screening measure to identify high-risk ash materials. However, the amount of contaminant leached varied widely across tests, reflecting the importance of ambient conditions (pH, redox state) on leaching. These results demonstrate that on-site geochemical conditions play a critical role in As and Se mobilization from coal ash, underscoring the need to develop a situation-based risk assessment framework for contamination by coal ash pollutants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalistrieriL.S., and ChaoT.T. (1990). Adsorption of selenium by amorphous iron oxyhydroxide and manganese dioxide. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta., 54, 739.
2.
CatalanoJ.G., HuhmannB.L., LuoY., MitnickE.H., SlavneyA., and GiammarD.E. (2012). Metal release and speciation changes during wet aging of coal fly ashes. Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 11804.
3.
ChouC.-L. (2012). Sulfur in coals: A review of geochemistry and origins. Int. J. Coal Geol., 100, 1.
4.
CórdobaP., Ochoa-GonzalezR., FontO., IzquierdoM., QuerolX., LeivaC., López-AntónM.A., Díaz-SomoanoM., Rosa Martinez-TarazonaM., FernandezC., et al. (2012). Partitioning of trace inorganic elements in a coal-fired power plant equipped with a wet Flue Gas Desulphurisation system. Fuel, 92, 145.
5.
DeonarineA., BartovG., JohnsonT.M., RuhlL., VengoshA., and Hsu-KimH. (2013). Environmental impacts of the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston coal ash spill. 2. Effect of coal ash on methylmercury in historically contaminated river sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 2100.
6.
FinkelmanR.B. (1995). Modes of occurrence of environmentally-sensitive trace elements in coal. In SwaineD.J. and GoodarziF., Eds., Environmental Aspects of Trace Elements in Coal. Springer: Springer Netherlands, pp. 24–50.
7.
GaddG.M. (2004). Microbial influence on metal mobility and application for bioremediation. Geoderma, 122, 109.
8.
HowerJ.C., TrimbleA.S., EbleC.F., PalmerC.A., and KolkerA. (1999). Characterization of fly ash from low-sulfur and high-sulfur coal sources: Partitioning of carbon and trace elements with particle size. Energ Sources, 21, 511.
9.
HulettL.D., WeinbergerA.J., NorthcuttK.J., and FergusonM. (1980). Chemical species in fly ash from coal-burning power plants. Science, 210, 1356.
10.
HutchinsonT.J., BasappaL., DikshitA., LuoY., CatalanoJ.G., and GiammarD.E. (2012). Fate of metals in fly ash during aging in laboratory-scale ash impoundments. Environ. Eng. Sci., 29, 1085.
11.
IzquierdoM., and QuerolX. (2012). Leaching behaviour of elements from coal combustion fly ash: An overview. Int. J. Coal Geol., 94, 54.
12.
KolkerA. (2012). Minor element distribution in iron disulfides in coal: A geochemical review. Int. J. Coal Geol., 94, 32.
13.
KossonD.S., SanchezF., KariherP., TurnerL.H., DelappR., and SeignetteP. (2009). Characterization of Coal Combustion Residues from Electric Utilities—Leaching and Characterization Data. EPA Office of Research and Development, Ed. National Risk Management and Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC.
14.
KossonD.S., van der SlootH.A., GarrabrantsA.C., and SeignetteP. (2014). Leaching Test Relationships, Laboratory-to-Field Comparisons and Recommendations for Leaching Evaluation Using the Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework (LEAF). Cincinnati, OH: Report US Environmental Protection Agency.
15.
LiuY.-T., ChenT.-Y., MackebeeW.G., RuhlL., VengoshA., and Hsu-KimH. (2013). Selenium speciation in coal ash spilled at the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston site. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 14001.
16.
LuomaS.N., and PresserT.S. (2009). Emerging opportunities in management of selenium contamination1. Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 8483.
17.
MeijR. (1994). Trace element behavior in coal-fired power plants. Fuel Process. Technol., 39, 199.
18.
RedmanA.D., MacaladyD.L., and AhmannD. (2002). Natural organic matter affects arsenic speciation and sorption onto hematite. Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 2889.
19.
RuhlL., VengoshA., DwyerG., Hsu-KimH., SchwartzG., RomanskiA., and SmithS.D. (2012). The impact of coal combustion residue effluent on water resources: A North Carolina example. Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 12226.
20.
SchwartzG.E., RedfernL.K., IkumaK., GunschC.K., RuhlL.S., VengoshA., and Hsu-KimH. (2016a). Impacts of coal ash on methylmercury production and the methylating microbial community in anaerobic sediment slurries. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts, 18, 1427.
21.
SchwartzG.E., RiveraN., LeeS.-W., HarringtonJ.M., HowerJ.C., LevineK.E., VengoshA., and Hsu-KimH. (2016b). Leaching potential and redox transformations of arsenic and selenium in sediment microcosms with fly ash. Appl. Geochem., 67, 177.
22.
SharmaV.K., McDonaldT.J., SohnM., AnquandahGAK, PettineM., and ZborilR. (2015). Biogeochemistry of selenium. A review. Environ. Chem. Lett., 13, 49.
23.
SharmaV.K., and SohnM. (2009). Aquatic arsenic: Toxicity, speciation, transformations, and remediation. Environ. Int., 35, 743.
24.
SmedleyP.L., and KinniburghD.G. (2002). A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl. Geochem., 17, 517.
25.
ThorneloeS.A., KossonD.S., SanchezF., GarrabrantsA.C., and HelmsG. (2010). Evaluating the fate of metals in air pollution control residues from coal fired power plants. Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 7351.
United States Energy Information Administration. (2014). Spot Coal Price Trends Vary Across Key Basins During 2013. Available at: www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=14631 (accessed August31, 2017).
28.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1992). Method 1311: Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2012a). Method 1313: Liquid Solid Partitioning as a Function of Extract pH using a Parallel Batch Extraction Procedure. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
31.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2012b). Method 1316: Liquid-Solid Partitioninig as a Function of Liquid-to-Solid Ratio in Solid Materials Using a Parallel Batch Procedure. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
32.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2013a). Method 1314: Liquid-Solid Partitioning as a Function of Liquid-Solid Ratio for Constituents in Solid Materials Using an Up-Flow Percolation Column Procedure. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
33.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2013b). Method 1315: Mass Transfer Rates of Constituents in Monolithic or Compacted Granular Materials Using a Semi-Dynamic Tank Leaching Procedure. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
34.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2013c). Technical Development Document for the Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
35.
VejahatiF., XuZ., and GuptaR. (2010). Trace elements in coal: Associations with coal and minerals and their behavior during coal utilization—A review. Fuel, 89, 904.
36.
VeselskáV., MajzlanJ., HillerE., PeťkováK., JurkovičĽ., ĎuržaO., and Voleková-LalinskáB. (2013). Geochemical characterization of arsenic-rich coal-combustion ashes buried under agricultural soils and the release of arsenic. Appl. Geochem., 33, 153.
37.
WangS., and MulliganC.N. (2006). Effect of natural organic matter on arsenic release from soilsand sediments into groundwater. Environ. Geochem. Health, 28, 197.
38.
WangT., WangJ., TangY., ShiH., and LadwigK. (2009). Leaching characteristics of arsenic and selenium from coal fly ash: Role of calcium. Energ Fuels, 23, 2959.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
